图片: | |
---|---|
名称: | |
描述: | |
姓 名: | ××× | 性别: | F | 年龄: | 49 |
标本名称: | Breast excisional biopsy (乳腺切除活检) | ||||
简要病史: | |||||
肉眼检查: |
Microscopically it is a 0.8 cm lesion as photo.
Your diagnosis and differential diagnosis.
(镜下病变直径0.8cm,如图。请诊断和鉴别诊断)
Send you a rare breast lesion case.
Slide keys
Fig 1-3. 4x
Fig 4. 10x
Fig 5-7. 20x
Fig 8. 40x
Fig 9. 20x
Fig 10. 40x
Fig 11. 20x
Fig 12. 60x
You will not see this kind case often even if you are breast pathologists. Hope whoever see the photos write down your dx and short discussion if you like to. Interested to know your dx. I assume that dx is not difficult for you in this website. Here is free and you can say what you want to. You will not have any responsbility. Just think it is your patient and how you will deal with the case.
I will come back three weeks later and have a short discussion with ones who are interested in this case.
Thanks,
cqz
abin译:这一例即使是乳腺病理专科医生,也不常见。希望看过的朋友写下诊断和简单讨论。很想知道你们的诊断。我猜这对你们网站上的人来说不难。这里是自由讨论,可以发表你的任何观点。不需要负责。只是把它作为你的患者,你将如何一日处理这一病例。
我会在三周后回来,与喜欢这一例的朋友作简短讨论。
谢谢。
以下是引用cqzhao在2008-10-4 1:27:00的发言:
Send you a rare breast lesion case. Slide keys Fig 1-3. 4x Fig 4. 10x Fig 5-7. 20x Fig 8. 40x Fig 9. 20x Fig 10. 40x Fig 11. 20x Fig 12. 60x You will not see this kind case often even if you are breast pathologists. Hope whoever see the photos write down your dx and short discussion if you like to. Interested to know your dx. I assume that dx is not difficult for you in this website. Here is free and you can say what you want to. You will not have any responsbility. Just think it is your patient and how you will deal with the case. I will come back three weeks later and have a short discussion with ones who are interested in this case. Thanks, cqz |
朱正龙
以下是引用cqzhao在2008-10-2 17:53:00的发言:
This is a typical tubular ca. Fig 1 20x H&E Fig 2.10x SMMHC stain Fig 3. 10x P63 stain Fig 4. 10x K67, very low proliferative index Tubular carcinoma (TC)is composed of small angular, oval, and tubular glands in the fibrotic background. Generally it is easy to make diagnosis. However it may be confused with sclerosing adenosis and microglandular hyperplasia (MGH). MGH glands also lack myoepithelial cells, but basement memberane stain (for example college IV) and S-100 stain are positive. These two stains are negative for TC. Microscopically, MGA is an infiltrative proliferation of small glands in fibrous or fatty stroma. MGA is composed of small uniform and regular glnads containing eosinophilic secretion. It is not difficult to tell the difference between TC and sclerosing adenosis (SA). However, occasionally SA can be a mimic of TC. When the dx is unsure, stains of myoepithelial markers can be very useful like my first case. Thank for reading
|
译文:这是典型的小管癌。
小管癌是由一些小的有角的、卵圆形和小管状腺体组成,包埋于纤维性间质背景中。一般情况下较易诊断,然而它可与硬化性腺病和微腺体增生(MGH)混淆。
MGH中腺体也无肌上皮细胞,但基底膜染色(Ⅳ型胶原)和S-100蛋白染色阳性,而小管癌中则染色阴性。镜下,微腺性腺病(MGA)是小的腺体浸润于纤维或脂肪间质内,腺体较小,大小较一致,腺腔内含有嗜酸性分泌物。
小管癌与硬化性腺病(SA)的鉴别并不困难。然而,偶尔SA可能误诊为小管癌。当诊断不确定时,正如本例一样,肌上皮标记物有助于诊断。
谢谢阅读。
回22楼和26楼:
需要在微腺性腺病和浸润癌之间鉴别。腺腔小,较一致,腺体周围似有肌上皮混杂,支持微腺性腺病。但部分腺上皮异型性明显,关键是脂肪组织中有浸润。不能除外癌。必须做P63,CK5/6和SMA等肌上皮标记。
期待Dr. Zhao的讲解。。。。。。
stevenshen 离线
Florid small glandular proliferation with infiltration of stroma and fat = microglandular adenosis pattern; marked cytologic atypia including prominent nucleoli; stroma alteration more than that of benign microglandular adenosis. Morphologic diagnoses infiltrating ductal carcinoma with microglandular adenosis pattern or arising from microglandular adenosis. IHC stain with myoepithelial markers and collagen IV and S100 (as described by Dr. Zhao) will be help to confirm the diagnosis. Never seen such a case. Look forward to hearing about the final diagnosis. Thanks.
abin译:小腺体旺炽性增生,浸润间质和脂肪,这是微腺腺病的生长方式;有明显的细胞学非典型性,包括明显核仁;间质的改变也超出了良性微腺腺病的程度。
形态学诊断:呈微腺腺病结构的浸润性导管癌,或发生于微腺腺病的浸润性导管癌。
作肌上皮标记和S-100免疫组化以及胶原IV染色有助于确诊。从未见过这样的病例。期待最后诊断。
谢谢。
华夏病理/粉蓝医疗
为基层医院病理科提供全面解决方案,
努力让人人享有便捷准确可靠的病理诊断服务。
以下是引用abin在2008-10-13的发言: 谢谢各位老师的讲解,很有启发。 |
Thank all of you for reading the case and writing your diagnosis here. Most of you have the correct or almost right interpretation or differential diagnosis.
This is a microglandular adenosis (MGA) case. The main differential dx contain tubular carcinoma (TC) and other adenosis and its variants. The diagnosis is not very difficult based on the morphology if you see few cases already. Histologically, MGA consists small round glands with open lumens, distributed mostly randomly in a hypocellular dense collagenous or fatty stroma. The glands are lined by a single layer of (flat to) uniform cuboidal epithelial cells and completely invested by a basement membrane (TC with no BM). The Lumen contains PAS+ eosinophilic secretion. You should make the dx if you know these morphologic features well. Please compare the morphologic features of this case with that of my above TC cases.
IHC stains can help you. I summaried a brief table below.
IHC Antigens |
MGA |
Tubular Ca |
Other adenosis |
cytokeratin |
+ |
+ |
+ |
S-100 |
+ |
- |
- |
ER/PR |
- |
+ |
+ |
Myoepithelial markers |
- |
- |
+ |
Basement membrane* |
+ |
- |
+ |
*Collagen IV, laminin, reticulin
Very glad to see that some of you have noted the presense of cellular atypia. Focal areas (last 4 photos) show varied gland configuration or irregularity of the glands. Some glans lack secretion and the lumens are obscured by celluar prolifearion. The cells demonstrate mild-moderate nuclear pleomorphism and prominent nucleoli. So the case was dianosed MGA with focal atypia or atypical MGA (AMGA).
MGA is an extremely rare benign breast lesion. 108 cases were originally diagnosed as MGA in M.D Anderson Cancer Center (one of the largest cancer center in the US) from 1983 to 2007. Of the 108 cases, 65 cases had available materials for review. 11 of 65 cases qualified to have MGA component. Myoepithelial layers was detected in other 54 cases and they were reclassified as adenosis. Now you know the true MGA case is rare and rare. The hospital I currently work is one of the largest gyn and breast center in the US. Only one MGA case was diagnosed in the past three years. The current case is the one when I worked at AFIP.
The lesion is spectrum of glandular proliferations ranging from uncomplicated MGA to MGA with atypia to MGA associated carcinoma (MGACA). For difficult cases IHC stains for Ki67 and p53 can be helpful.
Ki67: MGA <3%; AMGA 5-10; MGACA>30%
p53: MGA<3%; AMGA 5-10%; MGACA>30%
I think the percentage is just for reference and histologic features are the key for diagnosis.
Useful reference:
1. Khalifeh IM etal. Clinical, histopathologic, and immunihistochemical features .... Am J Surg pathol 2008;32:544-552.
2. Koenig C et al. Carcinoma arising in microglandular adenosis: an immunohistochemical analysis....Int J Surg Pathol 2000;8:303-315.
Just came back from China and feel tired. I put the case here three weeks ago and have to complete it . Sorry for the delay.
Thanks,
cqz
以下是引用cqzhao在2008-10-28 12:29:00的发言并翻译:
谢谢大家阅读病例并写出了诊断。大多数都给出了正确的判断和鉴别诊断。 本例为微腺腺病(MGA)。主要鉴别:小管癌(TC)和其它腺病及变型。如果见过几例,形态学诊断并不太难。组织学:MGA由小而圆的腺体组成,腺腔开放,大多数随机分布于少细胞的致密胶原化间质或脂肪中。腺体衬覆一致的单层扁平或立方上皮,有完整的基底膜包绕(TC无基底膜)。腔内含PAS+嗜酸性分泌物。如果知道这些形态学特征,应该能够诊断。请与我提供的上述TC病例相比较。 免疫组化可能有帮助,总结如下:
*Collagen IV, laminin, reticulin
很高兴看到有人注意到存在细胞学非典型性。灶性区域(最后4图)显示不规则的腺体结构。一些腺体无分泌物,细胞增生使腺腔结构不清。细胞呈轻-中度核多形性,有明显核仁。因此本例诊断为MGA伴局灶非典型增生(非典型性MGA)。 MGA是极其罕见的乳腺良性病变。1983-2007,M.D Anderson Cancer Center(美国最大的癌症中心)原诊断了108例MGA。其中65例有可回顾资料。11/65例有MGA成分,其余54例检出肌上皮层,重新归类为腺病。至此你会明白MGA确实是少而又少。我目前工作的医院是美国最大的妇科和乳腺中心,过去三年中仅诊断一例MGA。本例是我在AFIP工作时遇到的。 腺体增生的病变谱包括无特殊病变的MGA-MGA伴非典型性-MGA伴癌(MGACA)。困难病例,Ki67和p53免疫染色可能有帮助。 Ki67: MGA <3%; AMGA 5-10; MGACA>30% p53: MGA<3%; AMGA 5-10%; MGACA>30% 我认为上述比例仅供参考,组织学特征才是诊断的关键。 一些有用的参考文献: 1. Khalifeh IM etal. Clinical, histopathologic, and immunihistochemical features .... Am J Surg pathol 2008;32:544-552. 2. Koenig C et al. Carcinoma arising in microglandular adenosis: an immunohistochemical analysis....Int J Surg Pathol 2000;8:303-315. 我刚从国内回来,感觉累。三周之前我提供了病例现在必须完成。抱歉耽搁了。 谢谢。 cqz |
华夏病理/粉蓝医疗
为基层医院病理科提供全面解决方案,
努力让人人享有便捷准确可靠的病理诊断服务。