图片: | |
---|---|
名称: | |
描述: | |
性别 | 女 | 年龄 | 49 | 临床诊断 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
临床症状 | 阴道肿块,并无疼痛 | ||||
标本名称 | 尿道与阴道间隙肿块 | ||||
大体所见 | 淡黄色卵圆形包块1枚,2cm×1.5cm×1cm,切面亮白色,质韧。 |
本例图片采用麦克奥迪MoticBA410显微镜+MoticamPro285A摄像头采集制作。
点评专家:王曦
点评专家:王曦(42楼 链接:>>点击查看<< )
获奖名单:xhyong(12楼 链接:>>点击查看<< )
知之者不如好之者,好之者不如乐之者。(语出幽梦影)
Even though it is blocked right now, I would still like to “confess” that my original diagnosis for this case was “angiomyofibroblastoma”, based on the morphology posted on line. Here are my rationalizations for that diagnosis:
The tumor is small size (2 cm), well circumscribed, and not hypocellular as the aggressive angiomyxoma. It appears to be heterogeneous in cell distribution (clusters, cords and single cells) and in cell morphology (stellate, spindle and sometimes epithelioid), with areas relatively hypercellular and other areas more hyalinized/myxoid. The tumor cells in general are very bland. The vasculature is mainly capillaries to small vessels with perivascular hyalinization. There are clusters of epithelioid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm (best viewed in slide 17 and others), resembling the epithelioid cells in angiomyofibroblastoma. These cells can be clustered around vessels or as nests or cords or single cells in hyalinized/myxoid stroma. Mast cells and chronic inflammation cells are present, while no apparent mitosis or necrosis identified.
But then additional photos were sent to me:
I have to say that these photos look a lot different from the photos posted on line. It has to be smooth muscle tumor based on this morphology (cellular long fascicles intersecting with each other and with thick eosinophilic cytoplasm). Looking back at the original photos, I realize that there might be focal areas with spindle fascicles (slide 14, 15), even though it was nothing close to these photos.
As to leiomyoma vs leiomyosarcoma, one will have to count the mitosis and maybe look for tumor necrosis and other features under microscope. A Ki67 stain could be helpful as well, especially when it is compared with nearby normal tissue (smooth muscle). I have to say that for myxoid or epithelioid smooth muscle tumors, one doesn't need that many mitoses to classify it as malignant.
After all, a good lesson to learn in this case is that one should analyze the entire case, not just selected areas.
Xlhong should be the winner. He/she already made the diagnosis of smooth muscle tumor from the very begining, while I didn't even consider it.
非常敬佩王老师的专业精神,这面为点评译文:
虽然前面的点评被立刻屏蔽,我仍想“承认”根据所提供图片的形态,我对这例的最初诊断是“血管肌纤维母细胞瘤”,下面是诊断的理由:
肿瘤比较小(2cm),边界清楚,无同侵袭性血管粘液瘤样的细胞减少区。细胞排列(簇状、索状和单个细胞)和细胞形态(星形、梭形,有时呈上皮样)呈现多样性,部分区域细胞增多,其它区域大多透明样/粘液样变。总体上肿瘤细胞非常温和。血管主要是毛细血管至小血管,伴有血管周透明样变,有带有嗜酸性胞质的上皮样细胞丛(最后的视图为图17及其它),类似于血管肌纤维母细胞瘤中的上皮样细胞,这些细胞呈簇状围绕血管或呈巢、索状及单个细胞位于透明样或粘液样间质中,存在肥大细胞及慢性炎细胞,没有明显分裂相或可辩认的坏死。
但是另发送给我的图片:
我不得不说这些图片与上面提供的图片不同,根据这些形态肯定是平滑肌肿瘤(细胞长束状,互相交叉,有浓的嗜酸性胞质),回头看看原来的图片,我认识到这些可能为梭形束状的灶状区域 ,虽然没有接近于这些图片。
关于平滑肌瘤及平滑肌肉瘤,在镜下必须数分裂相、可以寻找肿瘤性坏死及其它特征,Ki67标记是有用的,特别是当与附近正常组织(平滑肌)比较时。我不得不说对于粘液样或上皮样平滑肌肿瘤,不需要用分裂相来分类其为恶性。
终究这例是一个很好的教训:全面分析病例,而不是仅选择部分区域。
Xhyong应该是获奖者,他/她最先做出平滑肌瘤的诊断,而我甚至没有考虑到。