共3页/56条首页上一页123下一页尾页
回复:56 阅读:9383
子宫内膜

九天揽月 离线

帖子:423
粉蓝豆:35
经验:666
注册时间:2008-01-11
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2010-08-04 17:35|举报|关注(1)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复
姓    名: ××× 性别:  女 年龄:  46
标本名称:  子宫切除标本
简要病史:  月经不调
肉眼检查:  内膜未见明显肿物
三小块带有部分肌壁的内膜组织,其中一块见腺体密集,膨胀性生长,乳头形成,胞浆嗜酸性。
  • 子宫内膜图1
    图1
  • 子宫内膜图2
    图2
  • 子宫内膜图3
    图3
  • 子宫内膜图4
    图4
  • 子宫内膜图5
    图5
  • 子宫内膜图6
    图6
  • 子宫内膜图7
    图7
  • 子宫内膜图8
    图8
  • 子宫内膜图9
    图9
  • 子宫内膜图10
    图10
  • 子宫内膜图11
    图11
  • 子宫内膜图12
    图12
标签:
0
×参考诊断
宫内膜非典型性复杂型增生,局灶宫内膜样腺癌,I 级。

zhanglei 离线

帖子:3751
粉蓝豆:2078
经验:3901
注册时间:2006-09-26
加关注  |  发消息
1 楼    发表于2010-08-04 18:09:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 这是一个子宫内膜的化生性改变,而非肿瘤性病变。请注意乳头状增生的腺上皮全部集中在内膜表层,而基底层腺体是正常的。化生的子宫内膜以乳头状化生为主。
0
回复

xclbljys 离线

帖子:5253
粉蓝豆:224
经验:7005
注册时间:2008-11-21
加关注  |  发消息
2 楼    发表于2010-08-04 18:35:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用zhanglei在2010-8-4 18:09:00的发言:

 这是一个子宫内膜的化生性改变,而非肿瘤性病变。请注意乳头状增生的腺上皮全部集中在内膜表层,而基底层腺体是正常的。化生的子宫内膜以乳头状化生为主。

 

不敢苟同,图1图2乳头状增生的腺体已到肌层,细胞有一定异型,不能排除局灶的粘膜内癌。做IHC鉴别。

0
回复
signature
许春雷

abin 离线

帖子:7383
粉蓝豆:6014
经验:11754
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
3 楼    发表于2010-08-04 19:08:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 xclbljys 

幸亏是子宫切除标本,可以想像诊刮标本的诊断非常难。

发现自己有时非常幸运,想要它就来。这种形态我最近连续遇到好几例,今天下午刚看过一例。

0
回复
signature

华夏病理/粉蓝医疗

为基层医院病理科提供全面解决方案,

努力让人人享有便捷准确可靠的病理诊断服务。


九天揽月 离线

帖子:423
粉蓝豆:35
经验:666
注册时间:2008-01-11
加关注  |  发消息
4 楼    发表于2010-08-11 15:01:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

免疫组化:

  • 图1
  • 图2
  • 图3
  • 图4
  • 图5
  • 图6
  • 图7
  • 图8
0
回复

全子 离线

帖子:3318
粉蓝豆:74
经验:3546
注册时间:2006-10-19
加关注  |  发消息
5 楼    发表于2010-08-11 15:17:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 嗜酸性化生,癌性化生,不典型增生是起步价,是不是内膜内癌就见人见智了

免疫组化有时候并不是想象的那么能帮助我们

0
回复

尹儿 离线

帖子:94
粉蓝豆:2290
经验:169
注册时间:2010-04-19
加关注  |  发消息
6 楼    发表于2010-08-11 20:22:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 癌似乎还差一点,考虑化生性改变。学习中!
0
回复

luoli 离线

帖子:35
粉蓝豆:21
经验:87
注册时间:2009-01-15
加关注  |  发消息
7 楼    发表于2010-08-11 20:47:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 子宫内膜腺体呈乳头状增生,大部分细胞呈合体细胞样,胞浆嗜酸性,细胞有异型性,核分裂像不多,内膜间质纤维化不明显,倾向于良性化生性改变,但不除外恶变可能。

学习了!再查查书。

0
回复

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
8 楼    发表于2010-08-12 01:35:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 请问:PTEN标记如何?谢谢!
0
回复
signature
王军臣

mingfuyu 离线

帖子:1008
粉蓝豆:1019
经验:1066
注册时间:2008-04-10
加关注  |  发消息
9 楼    发表于2010-08-12 07:59:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 I favor endometrial adenocarcinoma, at least atypical complex hyperplasia.  Immunostains don't help much.  PTEN is not going to help if we cannot make decision on morphology.
0
回复

江边观潮人 离线

帖子:2684
粉蓝豆:524
经验:3338
注册时间:2006-11-12
加关注  |  发消息
10 楼    发表于2010-08-12 19:37:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 atypical complex hyperplasia.
0
回复
signature

华夏

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1535
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
11 楼    发表于2010-08-13 06:26:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2010-08-13 06:53:00 编辑

 

谢谢Dr. 九天揽月提供非常好的讨论病例!

此病例主要鉴别诊断为:

1)内膜乳头状化生

 a.乳头状合体细胞化生 papillary syncytial metaplasia

 b.良性乳头状改变 benign papillary change

 c.绒毛腺样内膜增生 villoglandular endometrial hyperplasia

2)不典型复杂性增生;

3)内膜样腺癌1级;

 

0
回复
signature
xljin8

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
12 楼    发表于2010-08-13 18:47:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 
1.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2010;31(2):160-4.

Expression and significance of beta-catenin, Glut-1 and PTEN in proliferative endometrium, endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Xiong Y, Xiong YY, Zhou YF.

Department of Gynecological Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. ybeary@hotmail.com

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the potentiality of beta-catenin, Glut-1 and PTEN proteins as markers for a diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). DESIGN: Ten proliferative endometrium, 83 endometrial hyperplasia (59 benign hyperplasia, 24 EIN) and 24 endometrioid adenocarcinoma sections were immunostained for beta-catenin, Glut-1 and PTEN protein expression. RESULTS: (1) Abnormal expression of beta-catenin was detected in 10% of benign hyperplasia, 50% of EIN and 67% of endometriold adenocarcinoma. (2) Overexpression of Glut-1 was present in 58% of EIN and 71% of endometrioid adenocarcinoma. (3) Complete loss of PTEN immunoreactivity was found in 20% of proliferative endometrium, 29% of benign hyperplasia, 38% of EIN and 63% of endometrioid adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: The abnormal expression of beta-catenin and overexpression of Glut-1 may be useful markers in distinguishing benign hyperplasia from EIN, whereas lack of PTEN expression is not an appropriate marker for a diagnosis of EIN.

2.

Diagn Pathol. 2009 Nov 25;4:41.

Altered PTEN expression; a diagnostic marker for differentiating normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic endometrium.

Sarmadi S, Izadi-Mood N, Sotoudeh K, Tavangar SM.

Department of Pathology, Mirza Koochak Khan Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ssarmadi@yahoo.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different molecular alterations have been described in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EECA). Among them the most frequently altered is loss of the PTEN protein, a tumor suppressor gene. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the expression pattern of PTEN gene in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic endometrium. METHODS: In a study in a referral gynecologic hospital in Tehran, Iran, immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation of PTEN was performed on 87 consecutive specimens to the following three groups; group A- normal proliferative endometrium(n = 29); group B- hyperplastic endometrium [including simple hyperplasia without atypia(n = 21) and complex hyperplasia with atypia (n = 8)] and group C- EECA(n = 29). Immunostaining of cells was analyzed by arbitrary quantitative methods according to both slide's area staining and intensity of color reaction. RESULTS: PTEN immunoreactivity was present in all normal proliferative endometrium, all simple hyperplasia, 75% of atypical complex hyperplasia and in 48% of EECA (P < 0.001). The intensity of PTEN reaction was significantly higher in group with proliferative endometrium than hyperplastic endometrium and EECA (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PTEN expression was significantly higher in cyclical endometrium than in atypical hyperplasia and endometrioid carcinoma.

PMID: 19930726 [PubMed]PMCID: PMC2789036Free PMC Article

Related citations

Click here to read
0
回复
signature
王军臣

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
13 楼    发表于2010-08-13 18:50:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 3.

Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2009 Sep;28(5):471-6.

Utility of PTEN expression of endometrial "surface epithelial changes" and underlying atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

Quddus MR, Ologun BA, Sung CJ, Steinhoff MM, Lawrence WD.

Department of Pathology, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA. mquddus@wihri.org

Abstract

Surface epithelial changes (SECs) have been reported to be associated with endometrial carcinoma in about 49% of cases. They have also been seen to be associated with endometrial hyperplasia. Although morphologically benign, these lesions are considered a marker for underlying malignancy. Their true biologic nature, however, is not known. PTEN has been reported to be altered in endometrial carcinomas and endometrial precancers where no morphologic changes are appreciated. The current study aims to investigate PTEN status in the endometrial SECs. Thirty-two cases of endometrial biopsy are divided into 2 groups: group 1 had 18 cases of SEC and underlying endometrial atypical hyperplasia and group 2 had 14 cases of SEC alone. Four-micron sections were cut from each block and stained with antibodies to PTEN. One section was stained with hematoxylin and eosin to confirm the presence of the area of interest. Positive and negative control slides were run with each batch of staining. All 32 cases were followed for a median period of 54 (range, 21 to 84) months. Overall, PTEN alteration (NULL) was found in 12 of the 32 cases of endometrial samples (37.5%) examined. In group 1, 10 of the 18 cases (56%) of atypical endometrial hyperplasia with "SECs" showed PTEN NULL. Of these 10 cases, 6 (60%) cases showed FIGO grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma in subsequent hysterectomy specimens. Two other cases (20%) had atypical endometrial hyperplasia only. In group 2, two of the 14 (14%) cases of SECs alone showed PTEN NULL phenotype. These 2 patients were followed for 26 and 63 months, respectively, and subsequent endometrial biopsies and pap smears were negative. Of the remaining 12 cases that retained PTEN, 9 cases (75%) were negative when followed for a median of 54 months (range, 21 to 84 mo). SECs seem to be a heterogeneous entity. Presence of PTEN NULL phenotype in SECs and associated endometrial hyperplasia does not necessarily predict an increased incidence of endometrioid carcinoma in subsequent follow-up. However, absence of PTEN NULL phenotype in SECs alone may predict a benign follow-up.

PMID: 19696618 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Related citations

4.

Pathol Res Pract. 2007;203(3):153-62. Epub 2007 Feb 20.

Immunohistochemical expression of PTEN in normal, hyperplastic and malignant endometrium and its correlation with hormone receptors, bcl-2, bax, and apoptotic index.

Kapucuoglu N, Aktepe F, Kaya H, Bircan S, Karahan N, Ciri&#351; M.

Department of Pathology, Suleyman Demirel University, 32260 Cünür, Isparta, Turkey. kapucuoglun@gmail.com

Abstract

PTEN is a tumor suppressor gene that is frequently mutated in type I endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs), and is involved in the control of cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship between PTEN expression and estrogen, progesterone receptors (PRs), other apoptosis-related proteins, such as bcl-2 and bax, and apoptotic index (AI) in EEC, its precursor lesion hyperplasia, and cyclical endometrium. We also evaluated the relationship between PTEN expression and clinicopathologic parameters. PTEN, estrogen receptor (ER), PR, and bcl-2 and bax expressions were evaluated immunohistochemically, and AI was evaluated in hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained slides in 23 cyclical and 37 hyperplastic endometria and in 35 EECs. PTEN expression was higher in cyclical endometrium than in the carcinomas (p<0.05). The PTEN expression level was significantly higher in non-atypical hyperplasias than in EEC, but there were no differences between atypical complex hyperplasia (ACH) and EEC and between hyperplasias. In the carcinomas, there was a negative correlation between grade and PTEN expression (r=-0.338, p=0.047). In conclusion, we presume that PTEN is involved in the early phases of endometrial tumorigenesis, and it can be speculated that decreased PTEN expression with loss of differentiation in carcinoma can contribute to the emergence of tumors with a more aggressive phenotype.

PMID: 17317031 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Related citations

Click here to read
5.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 May-Jun;16(3):1412-8.

Expression of survivin, PTEN and p27 in normal, hyperplastic, and carcinomatous endometrium.

Erkanli S, Kayaselcuk F, Kuscu E, Bagis T, Bolat F, Haberal A, Demirhan B.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Seyhan, Adana 01250, Turkey. serkanli@tnn.net

Abstract

We aimed to investigate if expressions of survivin and p27 proteins are involved in the development of endometrioid carcinoma, along with whether there are any correlations between these proteins and loss of wild-type PTEN that is found in up to 80% of endometrial carcinomas. We also studied their correlations with classical prognostic factors and survival in endometrial carcinoma. To our knowledge, this is the first time survivin expression is investigated in endometrial hyperplasia along with endometrioid adenocarcinoma. For immunohistochemical analysis, 29 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 38 endometrial hyperplasia, and 10 proliferative endometrium tissue samples were selected in the pathology archives. Staining of cells was scored as +2 if >50%, +1 if <50%, and negative if none were stained positive. Survivin expression increased from proliferative to hyperplasia to carcinoma cases. PTEN and p27 expressions decreased in hyperplasia and carcinoma cases with respect to proliferative endometrium. All these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). PTEN positively correlated to p27 (P < 0.05); however, neither was correlated with survivin. None of these genes were correlated with classical prognostic factors such as grade and myometrial invasion in endometrioid adenocarcinoma. However, mean survival was statistically significantly higher in PTEN-positive cases (46.6 vs 16.4 months) (P < 0.05). Survivin overexpression might be one of the important mechanisms in the development of endometrioid adenocarcinoma along with lost or decreased activity of PTEN and p27. However, survivin seems to exert its role in ways different from those of PTEN or p27 in the development of endometrioid adenocarcinoma. These findings on the role of survivin in endometrioid adenocarcinoma should be confirmed and the pathways through which survivin acts in endometrioid adenocarcinoma studied further with a larger sample size.

PMID: 16803539 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

0
回复
signature
王军臣

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
14 楼    发表于2010-08-13 19:13:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

PTEN在子宫内膜病变鉴别诊断意义

图1 正常宫内膜 弥漫强表达;

图2 简单型子宫内膜增生,强表达;

图3 不典型性复杂型子宫内膜增生,仅灶阳;

图4 宫内膜样腺癌,无表达

  • 图1
  • 图2
  • 图3
  • 图4
0
回复
signature
王军臣

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
15 楼    发表于2010-08-13 19:15:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以上图片采自前述参考文献2,供本例分析参考。
0
回复
signature
王军臣

学浅 离线

帖子:2053
粉蓝豆:79
经验:3125
注册时间:2008-06-01
加关注  |  发消息
16 楼    发表于2010-08-13 22:36:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用mingfuyu在2010-8-12 7:59:00的发言:

 I favor endometrial adenocarcinoma, at least atypical complex hyperplasia.  Immunostains don't help much.  PTEN is not going to help if we cannot make decision on morphology.

0
回复

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
17 楼    发表于2010-08-14 10:32:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 请问楼主:有做过PTEN标记?
0
回复
signature
王军臣

江边观潮人 离线

帖子:2684
粉蓝豆:524
经验:3338
注册时间:2006-11-12
加关注  |  发消息
18 楼    发表于2010-08-16 22:47:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 回海上明月老师,我们这边没PTEN这个抗体。
0
回复
signature

华夏

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
19 楼    发表于2010-08-18 08:14:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 请网友们继续关注本例子宫内膜,如果赵老师有机会路过,请指教。谢谢!
0
回复
signature
王军臣

abin 离线

帖子:7383
粉蓝豆:6014
经验:11754
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
20 楼    发表于2010-08-18 21:40:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

沿金老师的思路考虑鉴别诊断:

1 良性和化生

乳头状全体细胞化生和嗜酸性化生见于表面上皮。鳞化可见于表面上皮,也见于腺体(桑葚)。它们均无真正的核非典型性。A-S反应有相应的间质改变并且与周围腺体存在移行过渡。本例不属于上述任何一种情形。

2 不典型复杂性增生

真正的核非典型性判断(请仔细观察图6,对比病变与周围正常腺体体会结构异常,观察最后几图体会核异常):核增大、变圆、染色质空亮、出现明显核仁。核级别已达到中-高级。此时如果是内膜癌,分级上升1级。

3 内膜样癌(IA期)
IA期指癌局限于内膜内,即:内膜内癌,或子宫内膜间质浸润,但无肌层浸润。
判断子宫内膜间质内浸润具有一定主观性,在此不作勉强区分。再观察图6,病变与周围正常腺体相穿插,是否认为是间质内浸润的一种表现呢?

总之,本例有肯定的细胞学异型性和结构异常,至少为复杂性不典型增生。如果是我的病例,报子宫内膜癌(2级,IA期)。

0
回复
signature

华夏病理/粉蓝医疗

为基层医院病理科提供全面解决方案,

努力让人人享有便捷准确可靠的病理诊断服务。


回复:56 阅读:9383
共3页/56条首页上一页123下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接