共3页/50条首页上一页123下一页尾页
回复:45 阅读:10323
女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)

学浅 离线

帖子:2053
粉蓝豆:79
经验:3125
注册时间:2008-06-01
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2011-08-13 14:25|举报|关注(2)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复

女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图1
名称:图1
描述:20114931_013.jpg.jpg desmin
女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图2
名称:图2
描述:20114931_014.jpg.jpg desmin 可见核旁点状阳性
女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图3
名称:图3
描述:20114931_010.jpg.jpg desmin 可见核旁点状阳性
女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图4
名称:图4
描述:20114931_012.jpg.jpg syn 可见核旁点状阳性
女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图5
名称:图5

描述:20114931_011.jpg.jpg syn 可见核旁点状阳性
免疫组化:阳性的有:vimentin     desmin    syn
                 阴性的有:CK-pan   CK20   CD99    LCA   HMB45     S100   CgA  
                      补做Actin:圆形肿瘤细胞散在+    梭形细胞-
  • 女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图6
    图1
  • 女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图7
    图2
  • 女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图8
    图3
  • 女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图9
    图4
  • 女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图10
    图5
  • 女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图11
    图6
  • 女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图12
    图7
  • 女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图13
    图8
  • 女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图14
    图9
  • 女,24岁,肛门旁肿瘤(免疫组化结果已上传)图15
    图10

肛门旁肿瘤十余天,生长迅速,伴有疼痛。临床诊断肛门脓肿而手术。

您的诊断与鉴别诊断:1、小细胞恶性黑色素瘤。2、横纹肌肉瘤。3、小细胞(神经内分泌癌)4、滑膜肉瘤。5、PNET/EWING肉瘤。6、淋巴瘤。7、淋巴造血系肿瘤。8、其他

标签:
本帖最后由 学浅 于 2011-08-16 17:18:24 编辑
0
添加参考诊断
×参考诊断
  

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
29 楼    发表于2011-08-16 19:24:26举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

在头颈部,有的腺泡状横纹肌肉瘤也可表达Syn。那么,本例肛门发生的腺泡状横纹肌肉瘤表达Syn就不足为怪。 


Hum Pathol. 2009 Mar;40(3):341-8. Epub 2008 Oct 29.

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma of the head and neck region in older adults: genetic characterization and a review of the literature.

Yasuda T, Perry KD, Nelson M, Bui MM, Nasir A, Goldschmidt R, Gnepp DR, Bridge JA.

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is remarkably rare in adults older than 45 years. Initial immunoprofiling of a small cell neoplasm of the head and neck region in an older adult may not include myogenic markers. A valuable diagnostic aid and important prognostic parameter in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is the identification of PAX3-FOXO1 [t(2;13)(q35;q14)] or PAX7-FOXO1 [t(1;13)(p36;q14)] rearrangements. The purpose of this study was to document the clinicopathologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features of head/neck alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma in older adults. Prior isolated descriptions of 3 patients were included. Five patients were female and 2 male (median age, 61 years). Each neoplasm was composed of undifferentiated, small round cells in a predominantly solid pattern. Initially, ordered immunostains corresponded with early diagnostic impressions of a hematologic malignancy or neuroendocrine carcinoma. CD56 was positive in 5 of 5 tumors and synaptophysin in 1 of 6. Given the virtual absence of other lymphoid or epithelial markers, muscle immunostains were performed and these were positive. Definitive alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma diagnoses were confirmed genetically. This study illustrates the diagnosis of head/neck alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma in older adults is complicated by its rarity, lack of an alveolar pattern, and a potentially misleading immunoprofile (CD56 and synaptophysin immunoreactivity) if myogenic markers are not used. Both PAX3- and PAX7-FOXO1 alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas were identified in these patients. In children, PAX7-FOXO1 alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is associated with a significantly longer event-free survival. In contrast, adult alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma behaves more aggressively with a worse overall survival than pediatric alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Further follow-up and additional cases are required to assess the prognostic relevance of these fusion transcripts in the context of advanced age.
0
回复
signature
王军臣

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
28 楼    发表于2011-08-16 19:17:16举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
下文提示,腺泡状形态的横纹肌肉瘤,可伴有间变和明显的与小细胞癌形态重叠,即:小细胞(小圆形或小梭形)表达Syn。这对本例的形态与表达Syn的理解可能会提供有益的帮助。请分享。谢谢!

Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Jul;32(7):1022-8.

Rhabdomyosarcoma of the urinary bladder in adults: predilection for alveolar morphology with anaplasia and significant morphologic overlap with small cell carcinoma.


Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) represents the most common malignant soft tissue tumor in children and adolescents with the urinary bladder representing a frequent site. Most of these urinary bladder tumors are embryonal RMS, predominantly the botryoid subtype. RMSs of the urinary bladder in adults are distinctively rare and the subject of only case reports. We report the clinicopathologic features of 5 bladder neoplasms with rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation in adults and emphasize the differential diagnosis in the adult setting. The patients, 4 men and 1 woman, ranged in age from 23 to 85 years (mean 65.4 y). Gross hematuria was the most common initial symptom, although 2 patients had metastatic disease at presentation. Four cases were pure primary RMSs of the bladder and 1 case was a sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma with RMS representing the extensive heterologous component. All 5 cases demonstrated a diffuse growth pattern (ie, non-nested), of which 4 cases had nuclear anaplasia (Wilms criteria without the atypical mitotic figure requirement); only 1 case (the sarcomatoid carcinoma) showed obvious rhabdomyoblastic differentiation (ie, strap cells). Three cases were of the alveolar subtype (1 admixed with embryonal histology) and 2 were RMS, not further classified. Microscopically, all tumors had a primitive undifferentiated morphology with cells containing scant cytoplasm, varying round to fusiform nuclei with even chromatin distribution, and frequent mitoses. The degree of morphologic overlap with small cell carcinoma of the bladder, a relatively more common round cell tumor in adults, was striking. The epithelial component of the sarcomatoid carcinoma was high-grade invasive urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation. No other case had previous history of bladder cancer or concurrent carcinoma in situ or invasive urothelial carcinoma. All tumors showed immunohistochemical expression for desmin, myogenin, and/or MyoD1. Synaptophysin was performed in 4 cases, and 3 showed weak cytoplasmic immunoreactivity. Two patients received chemotherapy, 2 underwent cystectomy, and 1 had transurethral resection alone. Outcome data were available in 4 cases, and all 4 died of disease (1, 4, 8, and 8 mo). In conclusion, (1) RMS of the urinary bladder in adults more commonly presents as a primitive round blue cell neoplasm that has significant morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap with small cell carcinoma of the bladder. (2) Although RMS in children generally have a botryoid embryonal histology with favorable outcome, bladder RMS in adults frequently demonstrates alveolar or unclassified histology, commonly with anaplasia, and have a uniformly aggressive clinical course.

0
回复
signature
王军臣

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
27 楼    发表于2011-08-16 18:56:15举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 海上明月 于 2011-08-16 19:08:02 编辑

综合病史(生长部位)、形态学(小细胞、腺样的腔隙样的结构)和免疫组化标记(突出显示desmin强阳性 ),诊断明朗。完全同意腺泡状横纹肌肉瘤的诊断。

可能不做一些标记就会使诊断铁板钉钉。

关于为什么腺泡状横纹肌肉瘤会表达Syn,可以认为是分化极差的肿瘤所显示的胚胎性形态表型与异源性免疫表型。请见我刚查阅的一篇膀胱腺泡状横纹肌肉瘤表达小细胞癌的形态与神经内分泌表型(小细胞形态特点,同时表达Syn)。请见楼下文献。很有趣。

0
回复
signature
王军臣

七公主 离线

帖子:83
粉蓝豆:18
经验:276
注册时间:2009-05-06
加关注  |  发消息
26 楼    发表于2011-08-16 16:22:21举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

考虑横纹肌肉瘤。

0
回复

liguoxia71 离线

帖子:4174
粉蓝豆:3122
经验:4677
注册时间:2007-04-01
加关注  |  发消息
25 楼    发表于2011-08-16 11:17:09举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

考虑横肉吧。

0
回复
signature
三人行,必有我师焉,择其善者而从之,其不善者而改之。

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
24 楼    发表于2011-08-16 04:57:49举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 XLJin8 于 2011-08-16 04:58:53 编辑

1)根据病人的年龄、病变部位、形态学和IHC标记结果,非常赞成诊断为:腺泡状横纹肌肉瘤

2)对于Syn阳性的问题比较难解释,可能为1)组织处理问题,2)组织受损伤,3)IHC标记非特异性染色,4)肿瘤细胞异表达。

3)Desmin的强表达更有诊断价值。CD99-除外Ewing/PNET; 上皮性标记-可除外DSRCT;LCA-除外淋巴造血系统来源。

4)IHC增加MyoD1 或Myogenin对鉴别意义并不大。

2

海上明月

九天揽月
回复
signature
xljin8

mjma 离线

帖子:703
粉蓝豆:24
经验:789
注册时间:2006-09-28
加关注  |  发消息
24 楼    发表于2011-08-16 00:22:16举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

Base on patient's age, tumor location, HE and immunohistochemistry, this is most likely a case of rhabdomyosarcoma (perhaps alveolar subtype) based on the desmoplastic stroma. The synaptophysin immunoreactivity is difficult to explain, and I would add Cam5.2, CD56, myoD1 and/or myogenin as further immunohistochemical investigation. If Cam5.2 and CD56 are negative, and one (or both) of the two skeletal muscle markers is positive, this would rule out extraosseous Ewing sarcoma or peripheral neuroectodermal tumor and small cell carcinoma, and confirm it is rhabdomyosarcoma. I do not believe this is Merkel cell carcinoma, lymphoma or melanoma.

1

蔷薇
回复
signature

聞道有先後,術業有專攻

yourself 离线

帖子:663
粉蓝豆:7132
经验:691
注册时间:2007-06-30
加关注  |  发消息
23 楼    发表于2011-08-16 00:07:33举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤可能性大,加做MyoD1、Myogenin

1

海上明月
回复

如风如雪 离线

帖子:315
粉蓝豆:1677
经验:984
注册时间:2009-08-21
加关注  |  发消息
22 楼    发表于2011-08-15 23:03:07举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
引用 21 楼 贝贝 在 2011-08-15 22:43:58 的发言:

请问老四老师,SYN阳性可见于横肉吗?


一切皆有可能

0
回复

贝贝 离线

帖子:851
粉蓝豆:15
经验:1510
注册时间:2007-11-23
加关注  |  发消息
21 楼    发表于2011-08-15 22:43:58举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

请问老四老师,SYN阳性可见于横肉吗?

0
回复

老四 离线

帖子:153
粉蓝豆:31
经验:347
注册时间:2009-03-28
加关注  |  发消息
20 楼    发表于2011-08-15 22:34:37举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

综合以上信息,首先考虑胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤,建议做MyoD1/Myogenin确诊。

4

海上明月

病理

天山望月

yumaoqiu..
回复

kint123 离线

帖子:1620
粉蓝豆:240
经验:2095
注册时间:2009-01-31
加关注  |  发消息
19 楼    发表于2011-08-15 21:45:14举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 太难解释这结果了,desmin对肌源性肿瘤的特异性还是比较强的,但也没有听说可SYN阳性见于肉瘤的介绍,促结缔组织增生性小圆细胞恶性肿瘤的阳性范围应该更广,疑惑中

0
回复
signature
The More We See, The Less We Know!

学浅 离线

帖子:2053
粉蓝豆:79
经验:3125
注册时间:2008-06-01
加关注  |  发消息
18 楼    发表于2011-08-15 20:32:54举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
免疫组化:阳性的有:vimentin     desmin    syn
                 阴性的有:CK-pan   CK20   CD99    LCA   HMB45     S100   CgA  
0
回复

zhouquan 离线

帖子:7752
粉蓝豆:290
经验:8263
注册时间:2008-11-09
加关注  |  发消息
17 楼    发表于2011-08-15 20:25:54举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

根据组化结果倾向横肉

0
回复
signature
成功不是得到多少东西,而是把身上多余的东西的扔掉多少。   

微观世界笨鸟 离线

帖子:1091
粉蓝豆:93
经验:2243
注册时间:2011-01-27
加关注  |  发消息
16 楼    发表于2011-08-15 17:56:26举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

恶性肿瘤!恶黑不除

0
回复
signature
刀尖舞者!

Liu_Aijun 离线

帖子:1292
粉蓝豆:119
经验:1678
注册时间:2008-04-14
加关注  |  发消息
15 楼    发表于2011-08-15 14:32:55举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 Liu_Aijun 于 2011-08-15 15:57:37 编辑

小细胞恶性肿瘤。需免疫组化。

鉴别诊断:1、黑色素瘤。2、横纹肌肉瘤。3、小细胞(神经内分泌癌)4、PNET/EWING肉瘤。5、淋巴造血系肿瘤.

0
回复
signature
If you have great talents, industry will improve them; if you have but moderate abilities, industry will supply their deficiency. 如果你很有天赋,勤勉会使其更加完美;如果你能力一般,勤勉会补足其缺陷。

zhouquan 离线

帖子:7752
粉蓝豆:290
经验:8263
注册时间:2008-11-09
加关注  |  发消息
14 楼    发表于2011-08-14 13:09:18举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

小蓝细胞恶性肿瘤,本例首先恶黑图1可见较多八字核,鉴别诊断淋巴瘤,小细胞癌,EWing/PNET,横肉,低分化癌

0
回复
signature
成功不是得到多少东西,而是把身上多余的东西的扔掉多少。   

liguoxia71 离线

帖子:4174
粉蓝豆:3122
经验:4677
注册时间:2007-04-01
加关注  |  发消息
13 楼    发表于2011-08-14 11:40:54举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

小细胞恶性肿瘤,考虑恶黑、小细胞癌、横肉等。

0
回复
signature
三人行,必有我师焉,择其善者而从之,其不善者而改之。

赌具 离线

帖子:380
粉蓝豆:12
经验:801
注册时间:2008-03-06
加关注  |  发消息
12 楼    发表于2011-08-13 22:42:13举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

学习

0
回复
signature
平凡一人, 风顺一帆, 平淡一生.

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
11 楼    发表于2011-08-13 22:36:57举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
引用 3 楼 学浅 在 2011-08-13 19:25:41 的发言:

肿瘤很大,临床与影像说12*6厘米。

肿瘤位于真皮层,浸润性生长,部分圆形,部分梭形,细胞异型明显,有的圆形细胞胞核肾形,核深染,部分区域明显挤压。


这样的话,要鉴别小细胞癌、淋巴瘤和横纹肌肉瘤(葡萄状肉瘤)等。

0
回复
signature
王军臣
回复:45 阅读:10323
共3页/50条首页上一页123下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接