共4页/78条首页上一页123下一页尾页
回复:78 阅读:10252
女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块

xljin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2010-07-06 21:13|举报|关注(2)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复
姓    名: ××× 性别:  女 年龄:  26岁
标本名称:  
简要病史:  怀孕32周,产前检查发现宫颈菜花样肿块, 活检
肉眼检查:  
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图1
    图1
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图2
    图2
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图3
    图3
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图4
    图4
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图5
    图5
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图6
    图6
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图7
    图7
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图8
    图8
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图9
    图9
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图10
    图10
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图11
    图11
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图12
    图12
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图13
    图13
  • 女/26岁 孕32周 宫颈肿块图14
    图14
标签:
0
signature
xljin8
×参考诊断
透明细胞癌

abin 离线

帖子:7416
粉蓝豆:6014
经验:11787
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
1 楼    发表于2010-07-06 23:46:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
年轻女性宫颈阴道的透明细胞癌,以前曾与宫内暴露到已烯雌酚有关。其它散发者极少见。形态与卵巢透明细胞癌相似。结构:腺管和微囊(内含嗜酸性分泌物)、实性、乳头,细胞:透明、靴钉、嗜酸。核大、深染、不规则,有明显核仁。但也可呈轻-中异型性。
沿着金老师的思路考虑的鉴别诊断:
1 微腺体增生MGH:染色质淡,核仁小或无,核分裂少或无。有鳞化或储备细胞增生,有中性粒细胞浸润。少数核增大异型并有复杂结构从而与透明细胞癌难区分,但往往都在典型MGH背景上出现。
2 A-S反应:通常为局灶性,或仅累及单个腺体的一部分、某个腺体或几个腺体。染色质模糊、空泡状或透明,核分裂少或无。胞浆嗜酸性或空泡状,可以嗜酸性包含体。
3 富含糖原的鳞癌:应该没有腺样结构。p63和CK5/6+
4 卵黄囊瘤:除腺样结构外,还有很多复杂结构如疏松网状结构、内胚窦结构、卵黄囊结构等。AFP+EMA-
5 腺泡状软组织肉瘤:假腺。
6 中肾管腺癌:老人(平均53岁),组织形态多变,混合。CK7、EMA、Vim、calretinin+,CEA、CK20、ER、PR-
7 转移癌(胃、肠、乳腺、肺、肾、输卵管、卵巢)
本例:
腺体结构复杂,筛状,图6/7明显浸润灶伴间质反应,胞浆变红。核非常大(比浆细胞大3倍以上),核分裂多,并有病理性核分裂。基本确定腺癌。分型困难,因为活检标本少,可能叠加妊娠改变,宫颈内膜型与透明细胞癌无法区分。不过这些图可以看出形态比较单一,没有透明细胞癌那样的多种结构和多种细胞,普通宫颈内膜型可能性大。
宫颈腺癌多与HPV感染有关,因此p16常弥漫强阳性。权衡风险与费用不惜多开免疫组化:p16,CEA,ER,PR,Vim,CK7,CK20,AFP,EMA,p63,CK5/6,calretinin,p53,Ki67,
大多数宫颈腺癌: CEA和p16阳性, ER和Vim阴性。
学习体会供参考!谢谢金老师提供的好病例,图很漂亮!
1

200406
回复
signature

华夏病理/粉蓝医疗

为基层医院病理科提供全面解决方案,

努力让人人享有便捷准确可靠的病理诊断服务。


天山望月 离线

帖子:4902
粉蓝豆:83
经验:5092
注册时间:2007-02-03
加关注  |  发消息
75 楼    发表于2011-11-07 12:22:05举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

好精彩的病例!谢谢金老师及各位专家的精彩讨论!

 

1

九天揽月
回复
signature
广州金域病理

老陈酒 离线

帖子:220
粉蓝豆:1673
经验:945
注册时间:2010-07-06
加关注  |  发消息
3 楼    发表于2010-07-06 21:59:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 我感觉是宫颈的炎性息肉伴孕激素反应
0
回复
signature
老陈酒

晨曦2007 离线

帖子:133
粉蓝豆:14
经验:171
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
4 楼    发表于2010-07-06 22:07:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 恶性肿瘤,图9可见三极核分裂,细胞胞浆透亮,异型性明显,考虑是透明细胞癌。
0
回复

Liu_Aijun 离线

帖子:1292
粉蓝豆:119
经验:1678
注册时间:2008-04-14
加关注  |  发消息
5 楼    发表于2010-07-06 22:20:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 clear cell carcinoma
0
回复
signature
If you have great talents, industry will improve them; if you have but moderate abilities, industry will supply their deficiency. 如果你很有天赋,勤勉会使其更加完美;如果你能力一般,勤勉会补足其缺陷。

Liu_Aijun 离线

帖子:1292
粉蓝豆:119
经验:1678
注册时间:2008-04-14
加关注  |  发消息
6 楼    发表于2010-07-06 22:21:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 DDx: yolk sac tumor
0
回复
signature
If you have great talents, industry will improve them; if you have but moderate abilities, industry will supply their deficiency. 如果你很有天赋,勤勉会使其更加完美;如果你能力一般,勤勉会补足其缺陷。

njwbhuang 离线

帖子:712
粉蓝豆:2265
经验:1404
注册时间:2007-11-23
加关注  |  发消息
7 楼    发表于2010-07-06 22:43:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 Just as architectural and cytologic similarities between clear cell carcinoma and the Arias-Stella reaction cause problems, so do some differences help resolve them. As is often the case when evaluating endocervical glandular lesions, low power evaluation is important. In cases of Arias-Stella reaction,
the glandular units have a spatial distribution that is consistent with normal. In contrast, clear cell carcinoma, even when small, often has an irregular distribution of glands in keeping with an invasive process. Although the Arias-Stella reaction may involve adjacent glands imparting a confluent growth pattern, the distribution parallels that of the normal cervical gland architecture. Interpretation of the Arias-Stella change in endocervical polyps is more challenging given that glands within endocervical polyps may be increased in number and have a more disorganized appearance; nevertheless, even in polyps, the spatial distribution of the glands does not suggest invasion. Furthermore, a desmoplastic stromal reaction, often associated with invasive carcinoma, is not seen adjacent to glands exhibiting the Arias-Stella effect. A helpful feature is partial involvement of glands by the Arias-Stella effect, with
normal-appearing endocervical cells adjacent to and intermixed with cells exhibiting the Arias-Stella reaction . From the cytologic point of view, it is helpful that the hyperchromatic nuclei of the Arias-Stella reaction do not have as conspicuous nucleoli as those of clear cell carcinoma often do. Also, although Dr. Arias-Stella allows mitotic figures in the change that bears his name and others have reported them, they are rare in our experience with this entity, being present in only 1 case in this series in which only 1 mitotic
figure was identified after an exhaustive search of all the cases. Moreover, although described in the Arias-Stella reaction, in our experience atypical mitotic figures are usually not present, and their presence should strongly raise the possibility of a malignant process.
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
8 楼    发表于2010-07-07 01:16:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用Liu_Aijun在2010-7-6 22:20:00的发言:

 clear cell carcinoma

Yes. Classic cervical clear cell carcinoma. No immunostains are needed for this case.

Tubulocystic pattern with intraluminal pink materials, lined with maligant clear cells.

-A-S reaction will not show so diffused change.

-MGH will not show this kind of atypia.

-Cervical yolk sac tumor is one of the differential dx. But YST is much more rare, usually occurs in children and morphology is not support it.

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
9 楼    发表于2010-07-07 01:44:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 Of cause my dx is based on the photos and also my role is as an observer.

Dr. Jin you need to read the slides carefully for your dx

0
回复

djdnx 离线

帖子:314
粉蓝豆:22
经验:567
注册时间:2010-05-24
加关注  |  发消息
10 楼    发表于2010-07-07 02:08:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

尝试翻译,但是感觉有点困难,可能不是很通顺

 

以下是引用njwbhuang在2010-7-6 22:43:00的发言:

 Just as architectural and cytologic similarities between clear cell carcinoma and the Arias-Stella reaction cause problems, so do some differences help resolve them. As is often the case when evaluating endocervical glandular lesions, low power evaluation is important. In cases of Arias-Stella reaction,
the glandular units have a spatial distribution that is consistent with normal. In contrast, clear cell carcinoma, even when small, often has an irregular distribution of glands in keeping with an invasive process. Although the Arias-Stella reaction may involve adjacent glands imparting a confluent growth pattern, the distribution parallels that of the normal cervical gland architecture. Interpretation of the Arias-Stella change in endocervical polyps is more challenging given that glands within endocervical polyps may be increased in number and have a more disorganized appearance; nevertheless, even in polyps, the spatial distribution of the glands does not suggest invasion. Furthermore, a desmoplastic stromal reaction, often associated with invasive carcinoma, is not seen adjacent to glands exhibiting the Arias-Stella effect. A helpful feature is partial involvement of glands by the Arias-Stella effect, with
normal-appearing endocervical cells adjacent to and intermixed with cells exhibiting the Arias-Stella reaction . From the cytologic point of view, it is helpful that the hyperchromatic nuclei of the Arias-Stella reaction do not have as conspicuous nucleoli as those of clear cell carcinoma often do. Also, although Dr. Arias-Stella allows mitotic figures in the change that bears his name and others have reported them, they are rare in our experience with this entity, being present in only 1 case in this series in which only 1 mitotic
figure was identified after an exhaustive search of all the cases. Moreover, although described in the Arias-Stella reaction, in our experience atypical mitotic figures are usually not present, and their presence should strongly raise the possibility of a malignant process.

正是结构和细胞学类似的的透明细胞癌和宫颈腺体A-S反应导致的问题,所以需要做一些鉴别来帮助解决。在评价宫颈内腺体病变时这是经常性的问题,低倍镜的观察是很重要的。在具有A-S反应的病例中,相关腺体具有一种与正常腺体一致的空间分布。相反地,透明细胞癌甚至病灶很小也经常会具有不规则的腺体分布以保持其浸润过程。尽管A-S反应可以包含临近腺体并赋予其一种融合性生长模式,但是其分布于正常宫颈腺体结构平行。宫颈息肉中A-S改变的判读是更具挑战性的,比如宫颈内息肉的腺体可能会有数量的增加和更加异常的组织像;但是,就算是在息肉中,腺体的空间分布并不提示浸润。还有,与浸润性癌密切相关的促结缔组织增生性间质反应,在具A-S反应腺体周围区域是看不到的。一个有帮助的特点是不完全的A-S反应腺体,表现为正常形态的宫颈内细胞临近或穿插于A-S反应的细胞。从细胞学特点来看,浓染核仁在A-S反应细胞中并没有透明细胞癌的显著。尽管Dr.Arias and Dr.Stella 认为分裂像在A-S反应中可见,还有其他的研究者也报道过,但是A-S反应腺体细胞的核分裂在我们一个研究表明很少见。还有,我们经验是A-S反应腺体细胞病理性核分裂像一般并不出现,如果出现将明显提升恶性的可能性。

 

解读:倾向于透明细胞癌。

猜想:妊娠期,高激素状态,腺癌细胞的so called Arias-Stella reaction.

 

 

 

 

0
回复
signature

病理董俭达

真相本来就在那里,我们只是努力的去靠近甚至找到她并一探究竟。

djdnx 离线

帖子:314
粉蓝豆:22
经验:567
注册时间:2010-05-24
加关注  |  发消息
11 楼    发表于2010-07-07 02:26:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用cqzhao在2010-7-7 1:16:00的发言:

以下是引用Liu_Aijun在2010-7-6 22:20:00的发言:

 clear cell carcinoma

Yes. Classic cervical clear cell carcinoma. No immunostains are needed for this case.

典型的宫颈透明细胞癌。本例不需要免疫染色。

Tubulocystic pattern with intraluminal pink materials, lined with maligant clear cells.

管状囊性结构并管腔内粉红色物,与恶性透明细胞肿瘤相符。

-A-S reaction will not show so diffused change.

A-S反应不会出现这等非常之杂乱?表现。

-MGH will not show this kind of atypia.

微腺体增生不会出现这样的异形性。

-Cervical yolk sac tumor is one of the differential dx. But YST is much more rare, usually occurs in children and morphology is not support it.

宫颈卵黄囊瘤是鉴别诊断之一。但是该瘤非常少见,一般发生于儿童同时本例的形态学也不支持。

 

 

翻译谬误,请指正!

 

 

 

0
回复
signature

病理董俭达

真相本来就在那里,我们只是努力的去靠近甚至找到她并一探究竟。

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
12 楼    发表于2010-07-07 06:25:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2010-07-09 05:09:00 编辑

感谢各位专家和网友的宝贵诊断意见。怀孕期宫颈透明细胞癌非常少见,根据最新报导,英文文献仅2例报导(下列参考文献-2)。本病例宫颈有5cm大小的菜花样肿块。HE倾向诊断宫颈透明细胞癌。IHC在进行中,会尽快将结果向大家汇报。

1.Vang R, Barner R, Wheeler DT, Strauss BL. Int J Gynecol Pathol. Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 and p53 helps distinguish endometrial Arias-Stella reaction from high-grade carcinoma, including clear cell carcinoma. 2004 Jul;23(3):223-33.

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Department of Gynecologic and Breast Pathology, Washington, DC, USA. rvang1@yahoo.com

The distinction of the Arias-Stella reaction from clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium is usually straightforward; however, this differential diagnosis can be difficult when the Arias-Stella reaction occurs outside the setting of pregnancy or in older patients. The differential diagnosis also is problematic when serous or clear cell carcinoma focally arises within an endometrial polyp, as part of "endometrial intra-epithelial carcinoma" (EIC), or in younger patients. The goal of this study was to determine whether immunohistochemical staining can distinguish the Arias-Stella reaction from endometrial high-grade carcinoma, particularly clear cell carcinoma. Cases of endometrial Arias-Stella reaction (n = 27), clear cell carcinoma (n = 11), serous carcinoma (n = 7), and EIC (n = 4) were assessed by IHC staining with antibodies for Ki-67, p53, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR). Composite immunohistochemical scores based on the percentage and intensity of stained cells were calculated, as was the overall positivity (percentage positive cases), using a cutoff value of >/=5% stained cells and at least weak intensity. Appropriate statistical tests were performed. Ki-67 and p53 immunostaining was significantly less in Arias-Stella reaction than in clear cell carcinoma (p < 0.0001 for both) or serous carcinoma/EIC (p < 0.0001 for both), measured by the composite immunohistochemical scores or overall positivity. ER showed a significant difference only between Arias-Stella reaction and clear cell carcinoma; PR showed a significant difference only between Arias-Stella reaction and serous carcinoma/EIC. When clinical or histologic features cannot facilitate the differential diagnosis, immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 and p53 may help distinguish endometrial Arias-Stella reaction from clear cell carcinoma and other types of high-grade carcinoma.

 

2.Terada T.Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in a young pregnant woman: a case report with immunohistochemical study. Med Oncol. 2010 Jan 7. [Epub ahead of print] 

The patient was a 30-year-old-pregnant woman (para 1, gradiva 1) without in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol. A papillary and flat lesion was found by colposcopy in the uterine cervix in the routine examination at 10 pregnancy weeks. Biopsies showed papillary and tubular proliferation of malignant cells with clear glycogen-rich cytoplasm and malignant hobnail cells and were diagnosed as clear cell adenocarcinoma. The patient was treated by radical hysterectomy. The lesion of the cervix (10 x 15 x 5 mm) was clear cell adenocarcinoma with mild invasion into shallow myometrium (pTIb). An immunohistochemical study showed that

the tumor cells were positive for pancytokeratins (AE1/3, CAM5.2, KL-1, and polyclonal wide), cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK8, CK18, CK19, epithelial membrane antigen, CA 125, p53 protein, and Ki-67 antigen (labeling = 95%). The tumor cells were negative for high-molecular weight CK (34betaE12), CK5/6, CK14, CK20, vimentin, AFP, CEA, desmin, S100 protein, alpha-smooth muscle antigen, CD34, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, chromogranin, synaptophysin, euron-specific enolase, and CD56. The patient is now of free of tumor. In the English literature, the present case is the second case of cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma during pregnancy, and the first case of cervical clear cell carcinoma investigating a wide range of immunoreactive antigens.

 

3.Ahrens WA, Barrón-Rodriguez LP, McKee M, Rivkees S, Reyes-Múgica M. Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the cervix in a child without in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol: a case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2005 Nov-Dec;8(6):690-5.

 

 

4. Nucci MR, Young RH. Arias-Stella reaction of the endocervix: a report of 18 cases with emphasis on its varied histology and differential diagnosis.Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 May;28(5):608-12

We report 18 cases of Arias-Stella reaction involving the endocervix with an emphasis on histologic features that can be encountered and result in the misdiagnosis of carcinoma. The patients ranged in age from 19 to 44 years. Two patients had a history of oral contraceptive use and 15 were pregnant; clinical information was not available in one case. Ten lesions presented as cervical polyps, and six were incidental findings in specimens obtained because of cervical dysplasia, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, fibroids, and a missed abortion. One patient was found to have a cervical "lesion" on a routine gynecologic examination. In the remaining patient, a cervical biopsy was obtained, for unknown reasons, at the time of termination of pregnancy. Microscopic examination showed a varied histologic appearance including vacuolated clear cytoplasm (18 cases), intraglandular tufts (16 cases), hobnail cells (14 cases), oxyphilic cytoplasm (13 cases), delicate filiform papillae (12 cases), intranuclear pseudoinclusions (10 cases), cribriform intraglandular growth (3 cases), and a single mitotic figure in 1 case. The histologic changes involved the superficial glands (6 cases), deep glands (4 cases), or both (8 cases); confluent or extensive gland involvement was seen in 8 cases. Follow-up information, available in four cases (4, 2, 1, 1 years), was unremarkable. The principal consideration in the differential diagnosis was clear cell carcinoma.

The features most helpful in this distinction were 1)the usual lack of a mass suspicious for cancer, 2)absence of a desmoplastic response, 3)lack of an infiltrative pattern, 4)spectrum of cytologic atypia, 5)low nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio, and 6)usual lack of mitotic activity.

 

 

5. Ordi J, Romagosa C, Tavassoli FA, Nogales F, Palacin A, Condom E, Torné A, Cardesa A. CD10 expression in epithelial tissues and tumors of the gynecologic tract: a useful marker in the diagnosis of mesonephric, trophoblastic, and clear cell tumors.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2003 Feb;27(2):178-86.

6. Miller DM, Schouls JJ, Ehlen TG. Clear cell carcinoma arising in extragonadal endometriosis in a caesarean section scar during pregnancy. Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Jul;70(1):127-30.

 

 

 

7.Hanselaar A, van Loosbroek M, Schuurbiers O, Helmerhorst T, Bulten J, Bernhelm J. Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix. An update of the central Netherlands registry showing twin age incidence peaks. Cancer. 1997 Jun 1;79(11):2229-36.

8.Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Kataoka A, Okura N, Iwanaga S, Yakushiji .

A pregnant woman with clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary arising from endometriosis and with benign and borderline adenofibroma of the clear cell and endometrioid types.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Mar;72(1):47-50.

9. Gynecol Oncol. 1996 Mar;60(3):339-44. p53 protein expression and gene analysis in clear cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix. Waggoner SE, Anderson SM, Luce MC, Takahashi H, Boyd J.

10. Waggoner SE, Anderson SM, Van Eyck S, Fuller J, Luce MC, Herbst AL.Human papillomavirus detection and p53 expression in clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix.

Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Sep;84(3):404-8.

 

0
回复
signature
xljin8

水中央 离线

帖子:2698
粉蓝豆:1119
经验:7190
注册时间:2009-10-07
加关注  |  发消息
13 楼    发表于2010-07-07 08:50:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 谢谢金老师的分享,继续学习中
0
回复
signature
刀锋上的蚂蚁

yilian206 离线

帖子:204
粉蓝豆:1119
经验:558
注册时间:2010-07-30
加关注  |  发消息
78 楼    发表于2011-11-09 13:03:13举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

癌。学习了。

0
回复

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
15 楼    发表于2010-07-06 21:23:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 病理诊断事关重大,请帮助鉴别诊断,谢谢!

1)宫颈Arias-Stella 反应?

2)透明细胞癌?

3)卵黄囊瘤?

4)微腺体不典型增生?

5)其他?

0
回复
signature
xljin8

小康生活 离线

帖子:60
粉蓝豆:153
经验:1303
注册时间:2008-05-30
加关注  |  发消息
16 楼    发表于2010-07-06 21:33:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 这种图像还是头次见,不过感觉不想恶性的。期待正确结果,学习中!
0
回复
signature
一腔热血向病理。

中原老狼 离线

帖子:159
粉蓝豆:7
经验:253
注册时间:2008-11-22
加关注  |  发消息
17 楼    发表于2010-07-06 21:35:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 感觉是恶性的

0
回复

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
18 楼    发表于2010-07-06 21:39:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 从综合图像看,具备腺癌的结构特征。P16、P53、Ki-67标记看看。
0
回复
signature
王军臣

hehhdk 离线

帖子:75
粉蓝豆:1
经验:75
注册时间:2008-08-28
加关注  |  发消息
19 楼    发表于2010-07-06 21:43:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 感觉不是恶性的。和妊娠有关的反应吧。
0
回复

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
20 楼    发表于2010-07-06 21:58:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 妊娠母体产生免疫耐受,如果原来有宫颈腺性CIN,有可能促进肿瘤进展为腺癌。所以需要IHC标记来鉴别诊断。
0
回复
signature
王军臣
回复:78 阅读:10252
共4页/78条首页上一页123下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接