共4页/69条首页上一页1234下一页尾页
回复:69 阅读:10660
少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)

xclbljys 离线

帖子:5253
粉蓝豆:224
经验:7005
注册时间:2008-11-21
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2010-05-27 20:05|举报|关注(3)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复
姓    名: ××× 性别:  男 年龄:  65
标本名称:  左肾脏
简要病史:  肉眼血尿两天,影像学提示左肾脏占位。手术切除肾脏,发现腹主动脉旁有核桃大肿块,临床怀疑为肿大淋巴结。
肉眼检查:  左肾脏肿大,切面以肾盂为中心有4X4cm不规则灰白区,质硬,与正常肾组织无明显界限。腹主动脉旁肿块切面同肾脏。取材:1.肾被膜处;2.病变与正常组织交界处;3.灰白病变处;4.腹主动脉旁肿块。

 

 

应金老师的提议,我们加做了HMB45,CD10,遗憾的是我科室没有Calponin。结果如图,请各位老师点评。

  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图1
    图1
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图2
    图2
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图3
    图3
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图4
    图4
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图5
    图5
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图6
    图6
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图7
    图7
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图8
    图8
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图9
    图9
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图10
    图10
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图11
    图11
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图12
    图12
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图13
    图13
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图14
    图14
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图15
    图15
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图16
    图16
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图17
    图17
  • 少见的肾脏肿块(新加免疫组化公布)图18
    图18
标签:
本帖最后由 于 2010-06-05 16:27:00 编辑
0
signature
许春雷
×参考诊断
集合管癌

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
21 楼    发表于2010-05-29 22:32:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 这个视野下,至少见2个核分裂。请仔细数3遍,每遍10个高倍视野(HPF),然后计算平均?个核分裂/HPF。

                                  

0
回复
signature
王军臣

xclbljys 离线

帖子:5253
粉蓝豆:224
经验:7005
注册时间:2008-11-21
加关注  |  发消息
22 楼    发表于2010-05-30 07:30:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 海上明月老师:在与您的交往中,我深深地被您尽职敬业的精神打动!最近华夏病理网在讨论我们病理人前途问题,我想,中国若有一大批您这样杰出的病理专家,何愁病理事业不能振兴,何愁病理专业不被重视。

我会按您的指点仔细寻找核分裂像,并像您汇报。

0
回复
signature
许春雷

笃行者 离线

帖子:2689
粉蓝豆:59
经验:3020
注册时间:2006-10-04
加关注  |  发消息
23 楼    发表于2010-05-30 09:24:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 很好的帖子,有大体有镜下,有低倍有高倍,有图像有文字说明。

工作做得很细。

同意海上明月老师的分析和意见。首选还是要选最常见的 肉瘤样癌。

最后诊断还得要看看免疫组化的标记结果。

0
回复
signature
博学之,审问之,慎思之,明辨之,笃行之。

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
24 楼    发表于2010-05-30 14:03:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用xclbljys在2010-5-30 7:30:00的发言:

 海上明月老师:在与您的交往中,我深深地被您尽职敬业的精神打动!最近华夏病理网在讨论我们病理人前途问题,我想,中国若有一大批您这样杰出的病理专家,何愁病理事业不能振兴,何愁病理专业不被重视。

我会按您的指点仔细寻找核分裂像,并像您汇报。

过奖了。呵呵。

我们都是同路人,一根病理线,牵系你我他/她,牵系千千万万病理人。我从本网各专栏、各专家、各网友(其中包括你)那里学到了很多知识和特殊的病例。我得感谢华夏网、感谢你们!

网络缘分,苦乐与共,相互交流,相互学习,共同提高。为的是病理的明天。谢谢!

0
回复
signature
王军臣

wang4160 离线

帖子:2256
粉蓝豆:16
经验:2617
注册时间:2007-01-31
加关注  |  发消息
25 楼    发表于2010-05-31 11:42:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 学习一下!
0
回复

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
26 楼    发表于2010-06-01 07:01:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 非常好的病例,恶性肿瘤诊断基本确定,关键在于组织学类型。根据形态学特点:细胞形态比较一致性,似上皮样细胞,细胞质透亮,无明显的多形性和高核分裂活性。肿瘤细胞与肾小球兼容性好。诊断还有考虑成人型肾脏透明细胞肉瘤等。
0
回复
signature
xljin8

wang4160 离线

帖子:2256
粉蓝豆:16
经验:2617
注册时间:2007-01-31
加关注  |  发消息
27 楼    发表于2010-06-01 09:04:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用xljin8在2010-6-1 7:01:00的发言:

 非常好的病例,恶性肿瘤诊断基本确定,关键在于组织学类型。根据形态学特点:细胞形态比较一致性,似上皮样细胞,细胞质透亮,无明显的多形性和高核分裂活性。肿瘤细胞与肾小球兼容性好。诊断还有考虑成人型肾脏透明细胞肉瘤等。

支持!!
0
回复

薛卫成 离线

帖子:123
粉蓝豆:3
经验:128
注册时间:2009-04-02
加关注  |  发消息
28 楼    发表于2010-06-01 10:19:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 猜两个:透明细胞肉瘤;上皮样Pecoma.期待结果
0
回复

xclbljys 离线

帖子:5253
粉蓝豆:224
经验:7005
注册时间:2008-11-21
加关注  |  发消息
29 楼    发表于2010-06-01 23:29:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
我们做了CKpan,CK7,CK20,Wimentin,EMA,CD68,S-100,CD34,P63,CD34,CEA共11项,图片背景偏黄是照相缘故。对于各种抗体的表达及强弱,请各位老师点评,并据此免疫组化对病变进行分析。谢谢!
  • 图1
  • 图2
  • 图3
  • 图4
  • 图5
  • 图6
  • 图7
  • 图8
  • 图9
  • 图10
  • 图11
  • 图12
  • 图13
  • 图14
0
回复
signature
许春雷

xclbljys 离线

帖子:5253
粉蓝豆:224
经验:7005
注册时间:2008-11-21
加关注  |  发消息
30 楼    发表于2010-06-01 23:47:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
接上页
  • 图1
  • 图2
  • 图3
  • 图4
  • 图5
  • 图6
  • 图7
  • 图8
0
回复
signature
许春雷

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
31 楼    发表于2010-06-02 20:14:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2010-06-02 20:36:00 编辑


1)p63+ -- 集合管癌?
2)肌上皮癌?转移性或原发性?
3) IHC再标记:HMB-45、Calponin、CD10 WT-1
4)参考 Am J Surg Pathol 最新文献,少数集合管癌 p63可阳性(14%)

Albadine R, Schultz L, Illei P, Ertoy D, Hicks J, Sharma R, Epstein JI, Netto GJ.
PAX8 (+)/p63 (-) Immunostaining Pattern in Renal Collecting Duct Carcinoma (CDC):
A Useful Immunoprofile in the Differential Diagnosis of CDC Versus Urothelial
Carcinoma of Upper Urinary Tract.  Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 May 11. [Epub ahead of print]
Departments of *Pathology double daggerUrology section signOncology, Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD daggerDepartment of Oncology, Hacettepe
University, Ankara, Turkey.BACKGROUND: Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is a relatively 
rare but aggressive type of renal malignancy with variable morphologic features.
One of the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for CDC is the exclusion of
urothelial carcinoma of renal pelvis from the differential diagnosis. PAX8 is a novel
lineage restricted transcription factor expressed in renal tubules. We investigated the 
expression pattern of PAX8 in CDC and its utility, in combination with p63, in resolving
the differential diagnosis of CDC versus upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UUC).
DESIGN: Archival tissues from 21 CDC and 34 UUC were retrieved from our institutional
files. Immunohistochemistry for PAX8 and p63 were performed on routine and tissue
microarray sections using standard immunohistochemistry protocol. Intensity of nuclear
staining was evaluated for each marker and assigned an incremental 0, 1+, 2+, and 3+ score. Extent
of staining was categorized as focal (<25%), nonfocal (25% to 75%), or diffuse (>75%).
RESULTS: CDC: All 21 (100%) CDC were positive for PAX8. Intensity of expression
was moderate to strong (2+/3+) in 19 cases (90%). Extent of staining was diffuse
in 13 of 21 tumors. The p63 was positive in 3 of 21 (14%) CDC cases (PAX8+/p63+).
UUC: The 34 UUC included 5 pT1, 4 pT2, and 25 pT3/pT4 tumors.Thirty-one of 34 (91.2%)
UUC were negative for PAX8, whereas 33 of 34 (97%) were p63 positive. Staining
intensity was moderate in 15 cases (44%), of which 12 were nonfocal or diffuse.
The unique p63-negative UUC was a pT1 tumor that was also negative for PAX8 (PAX8-/p63-).
CONCLUSIONS: We propose the use of the combination of PAX8 and p63 in the diagnosis of poorly
differentiated renal sinus epithelial neoplasms where the differential diagnosis includes
CDC versus UUC.The immunoprofile of PAX8+/p63- supports the diagnosis of CDC with a sensitivity
of 85.7% and a specificity of 100%. In contrast, a (PAX8-/p63+) profile supports the diagnosis
of UUC with a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 100%. The inverse PAX8/p63 expression
seen in CDC and UUC supports a renal tubular rather than an urothelial differentiation in CDC
given the nephric lineage restriction f PAX8.

0
回复
signature
xljin8

xclbljys 离线

帖子:5253
粉蓝豆:224
经验:7005
注册时间:2008-11-21
加关注  |  发消息
32 楼    发表于2010-06-02 21:57:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 请教金老师:

本例的Wimentin,S-100是否阳性?若阳性又提示什么?

0
回复
signature
许春雷

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
33 楼    发表于2010-06-02 22:49:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2010-06-02 22:55:00 编辑
S-100和Vimentin应该判断为阳性。

肾脏肿瘤往往既表达CK又表达Vimentin; 而S-100一般认为是周围神经、黑色素细胞、肌上皮细胞、脂肪细胞、颗粒细胞等的标记物,但平滑肌、嗜铬细胞瘤中支持细胞、有些神经内分泌细胞也可表达S-100。因此,S-100的特异性差,确定其意义必须以形态为基础。

建议再标记HMB-45、CD10、Calponin 是为进一步排除恶性黑色素瘤/软组织透明细胞肉瘤、肌上皮瘤等。

根据此例形态特点、IHC CK与Vimentin 双表达,尤其是肾小球完好,而周围肾小管区均为肿瘤,高度提示为集合管癌,并且又有p63+支持, 只要能除外转移性恶性肌上皮瘤,诊断就能基本确定。临床恶性度高,已有淋巴结转移,也比较符合集合管癌的生物学行为。

仅供参考,谢谢!


1

青皮橘
回复
signature
xljin8

xclbljys 离线

帖子:5253
粉蓝豆:224
经验:7005
注册时间:2008-11-21
加关注  |  发消息
34 楼    发表于2010-06-02 23:15:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 谢谢金老师!我们按照您的意见再做些工作,争取明确诊断。
0
回复
signature
许春雷

djdnx 离线

帖子:314
粉蓝豆:22
经验:567
注册时间:2010-05-24
加关注  |  发消息
35 楼    发表于2010-06-02 23:29:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2010-06-06 12:04:00 编辑

  CKpan、CK7、vimentin、S100淋巴结内大部分梭形细胞阳性,EMA淋巴结内部分梭形细胞阳性(+/-),

有意思的是p63似为胞浆定位,不知道是特异性还是非特异性。

 Antibodies targeting p63 react specifically in the cytoplasm of breast epithelial cells exhibiting secretory differentiation

G L Bratthauer, J S Saenger & B L Strauss
Department of Gynecologic and Breast Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington DC, USA
(2005) Histopathology47, 611–616

Antibodies targeting p63 react specifically in the cytoplasm of breast epithelial cells exhibiting secretory differentiation
Aims: The nuclear detection of p63 in myoepithelial cells of the breast has been useful in identifying possibly invasive carcinomas. While examining myoepithelial cells for p63 a very strong cytoplasmic reaction product was noted in secretory cells. The aim was to determine whether this reaction is specific for p63 and indicative of all breast secretory cells.

Methods: Thirty breast specimens were tested immunohistochemically for p63 protein. These included seven with benign secretory changes, 10 secretory carcinomas (nine invasive), one microglandular adenosis, three lobular neoplasias, four invasive ductal carcinomas, three clear cell carcinomas, one squamous cell carcinoma and one mucinous carcinoma.

Results: Only cells exhibiting secretory changes or secretory carcinoma were cytoplasmically reactive for p63. The positive reaction was also present as an intraluminal secretory product. This reaction was not seen in cells undergoing apocrine differentiation or in other cells containing secretory vacuoles.

Conclusions: Cells with secretory changes contain p63 protein or an antigenic equivalent. The detection of p63 protein continues to have considerable value for the identification of myoepithelial cells and thus the determination of invasion, but will also have value in the determination of secretory carcinomas of the breast and in understanding their development.


Date of submission 27 January 2005 Accepted for publication 5 April 2005

Aberrant Cytoplasmic Expression of p63 and Prostate Cancer Mortality

  1. Abstract

Protein expression of p63 is used to differentiate prostate cancer from benign mimickers. Recent studies suggest that it may also distinguish aggressive prostate cancer with down-regulated expression occurring in men with more advanced disease. We conducted a prospective study among 298 men ages 51 to 84 years who were diagnosed with prostate cancer in the Physicians' Health Study in 1983 to 2004 and whose tissue was available for immunohistochemical staining. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the association of p63 protein expression with fatal prostate cancer. We correlated p63 expression with tumor cell proliferation (Ki-67) and apoptosis (TUNEL staining). The predominant location of tumor p63 staining occurred in the cytoplasm, an uncommon departure from the strong nuclear staining usually observed in nonneoplastic basal cells. Increasing expression of cytoplasmic p63 (tertiles) was associated with prostate cancer mortality (n = 19 deaths); the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 1.0 (reference), 4.0 (0.9-18.9), and 5.9 (1.3-27.5; Ptrend = 0.03). The positive trend remained significant (P = 0.047) after multivariable adjustment for age, year of diagnosis, and Gleason score. Higher tertiles of cytoplasmic p63 were also associated with reduced levels of apoptosis (Ptrend = 0.0408) and increased cellular proliferation (Ptrend = 0.0026). We found aberrant expression of p63 in the cytoplasm to be associated with increased prostate cancer-specific mortality up to 20 years after diagnosis. The mislocalized expression was associated with reduced apoptosis and higher proliferative activity and may suggest an oncogenic role in prostate cancer progression and survival.

(Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(2):595–600)

0
回复
signature

病理董俭达

真相本来就在那里,我们只是努力的去靠近甚至找到她并一探究竟。

liguoxia71 离线

帖子:4174
粉蓝豆:3122
经验:4677
注册时间:2007-04-01
加关注  |  发消息
36 楼    发表于2010-06-03 17:44:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 

细胞比较一致,上皮样,异型性不明显,核分裂不多。肿瘤恶度应该不高。

而像肾肉瘤样癌、肾髓质癌、集合管癌的瘤细胞异型性应该要明显一些,肿瘤恶度要高一些。

俺主要考虑肾癌或pecoma,如果是肾癌,属什么类型呢?

0
回复
signature
三人行,必有我师焉,择其善者而从之,其不善者而改之。

abin 离线

帖子:7416
粉蓝豆:6014
经验:11787
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
37 楼    发表于2010-06-03 23:30:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用liguoxia71在2010-6-3 17:44:00的发言:

 

细胞比较一致,上皮样,异型性不明显,核分裂不多。肿瘤恶度应该不高。

而像肾肉瘤样癌、肾髓质癌、集合管癌的瘤细胞异型性应该要明显一些,肿瘤恶度要高一些。

俺主要考虑肾癌或pecoma,如果是肾癌,属什么类型呢?

肾的梭形细胞肿瘤较常见的是肉瘤样癌。
0
回复
signature

华夏病理/粉蓝医疗

为基层医院病理科提供全面解决方案,

努力让人人享有便捷准确可靠的病理诊断服务。


wnnt 离线

帖子:51
粉蓝豆:1
经验:114
注册时间:2007-11-24
加关注  |  发消息
38 楼    发表于2010-06-04 13:50:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 肉瘤样癌或分化差的集合管癌
0
回复

红脸汉 离线

帖子:101
粉蓝豆:16
经验:429
注册时间:2010-03-03
加关注  |  发消息
39 楼    发表于2010-06-04 14:07:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 树突细胞肿瘤表达CD31、CD23、CD35;指状突细胞表达S-100;淋巴结网状细胞两种:CK(-)或CK(+)
0
回复

xclbljys 离线

帖子:5253
粉蓝豆:224
经验:7005
注册时间:2008-11-21
加关注  |  发消息
40 楼    发表于2010-06-05 16:26:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
应金老师的提议,我们加做了HMB45,CD10,遗憾的是我科室没有Calponin。结果如图,请各位老师点评。
  • 图1
  • 图2
  • 图3
  • 图4
0
回复
signature
许春雷
回复:69 阅读:10660
共4页/69条首页上一页1234下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接