） 
| 图片： | |
|---|---|
| 名称： | |
| 描述： | |
- 痛苦的宫颈活检会诊结果1
-
listli1999 离线
- 帖子：368
- 粉蓝豆：1
- 经验：478
- 注册时间：2007-02-13
- 加关注 | 发消息
-
listli1999 离线
- 帖子：368
- 粉蓝豆：1
- 经验：478
- 注册时间：2007-02-13
- 加关注 | 发消息
-
liguoxia71 离线
- 帖子：4174
- 粉蓝豆：3122
- 经验：4677
- 注册时间：2007-04-01
- 加关注 | 发消息
-
listli1999 离线
- 帖子：368
- 粉蓝豆：1
- 经验：478
- 注册时间：2007-02-13
- 加关注 | 发消息
-
I agree with most of you that this is a relatively normal cervical squamous mucosa, not CIN1.
There are two morphologic changes which may confuse some of you: one is perinuclear halo and another is surface parakeratosis.
As I mentioned in my talk, halo per se is not equivalent to "koilocytosis". The key is nuclear atypia in CIN lesion, not isolated halos. In this case, the squame maintains its nice maturation, cells are ranged in order and lack of nuclear atypia. Therefore, it is not enough for me to call CIN1.
The parakeratosis on the surface is so much like we see in prolapse case. Please check if this patient has cervical prolaps (zi gong tuo cui).
- 不坠青云之志，长怀赤子之心
-
simple1014 离线
- 帖子：68
- 粉蓝豆：1279
- 经验：237
- 注册时间：2007-11-29
- 加关注 | 发消息
