图片: | |
---|---|
名称: | |
描述: | |
姓 名: | ××× | 性别: | 女 | 年龄: | 28 |
标本名称: | |||||
简要病史: | |||||
肉眼检查: |
This is a challenge and debatable case in the begining. It is complete case from frozen to final dx to follow up result. It was reviewed and consulted in several hospitals in China. The photos were reviewed by several internatonal famous soft tissue pathologists for their oppinions. Nice case for learning.
It is difficult to evaluate some challenge cases based on a few photos online.
大家在网站的討论建议仅供参考。特别是对基层医院的病理医生,无论别人怎样建议,你在签发病理报告时必须真正了解和同意这个诊断,即使是上级医院的专家会诊意见,because it is your own case.
总 置顶 few days for more people to learn the lesson.
We all should thank Drwfbjwt for providing the case.
cz
Thank Dr. wfbjwt for the follow up. Now no doubt it is angiosarcoma because patient has recurrent and also distant metastasis.
Now we can go back to review the case.
1. Clearly cytology is very bland.
2. Why is it a malignant tumor?
多发结节状生长,无包膜,周围组织界限不清 and tumor size. These features seem important for evaluation of the breast vascular lesions.
I once asked several experts to review the photos and got different oppinions. I think there are two reasons. Firstly this is a difficult case. More important fact to affect the evaluation is that they only saw a few photos, but not true all slides and gross specimen.
In fact after I got different oppinions from expert pathologist I mentioned above, I sent a few photos to other top soft tissue pathologists in the US or in the world. Dr. Christopher Fletcher(Harvard Medical School) thought it was a angiosarcoma, but another pathologist was not sure the diagnosis.
Anyway it is sad for the young women. However it is a good case for us to learn.
Thanks wfbjwt again.
以下是引用wfbjwt在2009-4-29 17:05:00的发言:
感谢大家对帖子的关注,提出的问题也很有借鉴性,感谢了! |
taotaochan 离线
redsnow007 离线
今天终于找到答案了。回答zhao老师:我们一般认为KI67阳性率小于5%就是阴性,今天看国外资料,才知道PI,也就是增殖指数的计算是计数10000个肿瘤细胞中KI67的阳性数量,ZHAO老师前面推荐文章中认为cutoff值是175左右,也就是1%-2%左右,在我们判断就是阴性的,故结论不同了。复习我们的切片,高分化区域,包括我发的图片,都可以见到少量阳性细胞,大约1%左右,中分化区域大约5%左右,与国外文献是符合的。只是我试着计数10000个细胞,尤其是这种肿瘤细胞数量少的病例,太难了。谢谢zhao老师让我总是留心相关的问题,学了不少,谢谢zhao老师了!另外,大家可以讨论一下,PI虽低,但也有诊断价值的问题。