共2页/21条首页上一页12下一页尾页
回复:21 阅读:7156
女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)

天山望月 离线

帖子:4902
粉蓝豆:83
经验:5092
注册时间:2007-02-03
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2011-11-16 19:21|举报|关注(1)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复

女,33岁。

左颞部有一大小2x3cm的肿块,切面灰白色,质软,边界清,包膜完整,周围无粘连。

灰红不规则组织一块,体积2.5×2×1cm,切面灰红,实性质中。

 

  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图1
    图1
  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图2
    图2
  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图3
    图3
  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图4
    图4
  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图5
    图5
  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图6
    图6
  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图7
    图7
  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图8
    图8
  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图9
    图9
  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图10
    图10
  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图11
    图11
  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图12
    图12
  • 女,33岁,左颞部肿块(1126819)图13
    图13

 

 

 

标签:
0
signature
广州金域病理
×参考诊断
粘表

TK1905 离线

帖子:962
粉蓝豆:283
经验:1054
注册时间:2010-03-14
加关注  |  发消息
17 楼    发表于2011-11-27 15:25:28举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

Carcinoma Ex Pleomorphic Adenoma早已有翻译——癌在多形性腺瘤中。

本例是良性的,无恶性特征。汗腺瘤、软组织混合瘤可以这样。有多种分化而已。有些囊性区域,有些透明细胞汗腺瘤区域

2

海上明月

成 克 伦
回复

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
6 楼    发表于2011-11-16 22:34:26举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

关键是需要证明究竟那些酷似黏液上皮是不是真正的黏液上皮。如果是,宁愿诊断为黏表。

需要谨慎采用组织化学和IHC标记证明到底含不含有黏液腺上皮。多取材看看。找到典型的黏液上皮可以在形态学方面帮助诊断。

如果不能在形态学和组化上证明含有真正的黏液上皮,可诊断混合瘤。然后带一个小尾巴。

2

jinsongl..

贝贝
回复
signature
王军臣

天山望月 离线

帖子:4902
粉蓝豆:83
经验:5092
注册时间:2007-02-03
加关注  |  发消息
12 楼    发表于2011-11-17 20:45:57举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

谢谢明月老师!

也就是说诊断粘表较合适啦。

1

sjluwfmc
回复
signature
广州金域病理

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
11 楼    发表于2011-11-17 19:20:35举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

含黏液上皮

 

 

0
回复
signature
王军臣

老四 离线

帖子:153
粉蓝豆:31
经验:347
注册时间:2009-03-28
加关注  |  发消息
13 楼    发表于2011-11-17 23:15:43举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

根据大体描述和组织学(出现鳞状细胞团和浆样肌上皮)符合多形性腺瘤,建议加做肌上皮标记SMA/calponin/HHF-35(因肿瘤肌上皮标记物表达不定,这几个相对稳定而特异,P63特异性差),即使局灶性出现粘表样表现也不矛盾。本例细胞异型不明显,Ki67指数低,P53阳性>50%(阳性较弱)意义不大,一般要求较弥漫强阳性才有提示意义。

0
回复

天山望月 离线

帖子:4902
粉蓝豆:83
经验:5092
注册时间:2007-02-03
加关注  |  发消息
16 楼    发表于2011-11-25 10:25:18举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

谢谢limo!

提供这么全的文献,这几天忙,还没顾上细细看。请大家继续讨论,谢谢!

0
回复
signature
广州金域病理

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
18 楼    发表于2011-11-27 18:03:46举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

如果诊断良性,将如何解释其中含有粘液性上皮?

0
回复
signature
王军臣

天山望月 离线

帖子:4902
粉蓝豆:83
经验:5092
注册时间:2007-02-03
加关注  |  发消息
1 楼    发表于2011-11-16 21:05:57举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

  • 图1
  • 图2
  • 图3
  • 图4

 

0
回复
signature
广州金域病理

xhyong 离线

帖子:1060
粉蓝豆:519
经验:1993
注册时间:2006-10-19
加关注  |  发消息
21 楼    发表于2012-01-25 20:58:33举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

混合瘤合适吧,如果是粘表,则应该出现在硬化的背景中,本例看来背景是多形性腺瘤的背景,而癌在多形性腺瘤中非特殊类型腺癌多见,如果发生在包膜内的癌,则应该有分裂像和异型性

0
回复

200406 离线

帖子:1385
粉蓝豆:145
经验:2735
注册时间:2011-08-08
加关注  |  发消息
3 楼    发表于2011-11-16 22:05:26举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

汗腺良性肿瘤

0
回复

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
4 楼    发表于2011-11-16 22:12:10举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 海上明月 于 2011-11-16 22:12:37 编辑

混合瘤,唾腺(腮腺?)或皮肤汗腺来源。

黏液染色鉴别黏表。

0
回复
signature
王军臣

天山望月 离线

帖子:4902
粉蓝豆:83
经验:5092
注册时间:2007-02-03
加关注  |  发消息
5 楼    发表于2011-11-16 22:18:25举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

免疫组化:腺上皮CK8/18(+),P63(+)、P53(+50%)、Ki-67(+5%)、S-100(-)、 GCDFP-15(-)、GFAP(-)。

0
回复
signature
广州金域病理

天山望月 离线

帖子:4902
粉蓝豆:83
经验:5092
注册时间:2007-02-03
加关注  |  发消息
8 楼    发表于2011-11-17 17:49:32举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 AB/PAS

 

  • 图1
  • 图2
  • 图3
  • 图4
  • 图5
  • 图6
  • 图7
  • 图8
0
回复
signature
广州金域病理

天山望月 离线

帖子:4902
粉蓝豆:83
经验:5092
注册时间:2007-02-03
加关注  |  发消息
9 楼    发表于2011-11-17 17:53:41举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

此例以肌上皮样细胞为主,仅小灶区域见粘液细胞,如图染色。

HE上可见明确的鳞状上皮巢,曾听周晓军老师讲过涎腺的肿瘤,如见到明确的鳞状上皮,是不考虑粘表的。

请教专家:此例诊断混合瘤,加个尾巴好呢,还是诊断粘表?

谢谢!

 

0
回复
signature
广州金域病理

limo 离线

帖子:98
粉蓝豆:8
经验:371
注册时间:2010-11-02
加关注  |  发消息
19 楼    发表于2011-11-27 23:03:52举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
引用 17 楼 TK1905 在 2011-11-27 15:25:28 的发言:

Carcinoma Ex Pleomorphic Adenoma早已有翻译——癌在多形性腺瘤中。

本例是良性的,无恶性特征。汗腺瘤、软组织混合瘤可以这样。有多种分化而已。有些囊性区域,有些透明细胞汗腺瘤区域

谢谢您的提示和翻译,EX这个可以作为词根也可以作为单词来看,是从。。。来的,不是中的意思啊,就像是溃疡恶变和癌溃疡的概念。这个概念更倾向“发生自(来自)多形性腺瘤的癌”或是“癌从多形性腺瘤发生的”或是“由多形性腺瘤发展来的癌”或是“癌由多形性腺瘤发展而来”,这样强调的是在多形性腺瘤发生和发展基础上由于其瘤内腺上皮和肌上皮发生恶性癌变从而发展形成的恶性肿瘤成分,这个因果关系和“癌在多形性腺瘤中”的概念是不同,后者有可能是二元论的感觉,不能够完全提示病变的因果关系,也不能很好的给临床提供多形性腺瘤癌变的潜在风险性。个人看法啊,主要是我当时看到咱们网上的两个病例和网上的文献,自己本身感觉这个概念不是很好理解,所以说说自己的看法,欢迎大家拍砖啊,呵呵

哈哈,就本例。我的感觉是就形态学论形态学的角度,多形性腺瘤中的粘液性上皮成分周围可见基底细胞样类似肌上皮成分或中间细胞样或是表皮细胞样的区域,还是非常符合粘液表皮样癌的形态学的,这样成分的出现应该是出现在病例报告内,因为多形性腺瘤的病人必然会面对着复发甚至长期存在年龄大了以后的其他可能。因为肿瘤体积中等,估计楼主看到的包膜情况是乐观的,所以病人本身的预后是乐观的,但是随访也是应该和必须提醒病人的。

0
回复

天山望月 离线

帖子:4902
粉蓝豆:83
经验:5092
注册时间:2007-02-03
加关注  |  发消息
7 楼    发表于2011-11-16 22:41:01举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 天山望月 于 2011-11-16 22:50:57 编辑

谢谢明月老师!考虑的非常周到,受益了!

粘液样腺体,CK8/18+,P63-,余相反。肿瘤不大,已全部取材。

加做AB/PAS再看看吧。

 

0
回复
signature
广州金域病理

防港一员 离线

帖子:410
粉蓝豆:30
经验:1041
注册时间:2010-08-13
加关注  |  发消息
20 楼    发表于2011-11-27 23:38:29举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 估计很少人敢诊断恶性 

0
回复
signature
有志者事竟成

limo 离线

帖子:98
粉蓝豆:8
经验:371
注册时间:2010-11-02
加关注  |  发消息
14 楼    发表于2011-11-18 17:27:41举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

Pathology of Carcinoma Ex Pleomorphic Adenoma 

  • Author: M Sherif Said, MD, PhD; Chief Editor: M Sherif Said, MD, PhD 

Different patterns of malignant change occur in pleomorphic adenoma, of which carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is one form; the other 2 forms aretrue malignant mixed tumor (carcinosarcoma) and metastasizing pleomorphic adenoma.

carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is defined as a carcinoma that arises in the epithelial and/or myoepithelial component of a pleomorphic adenoma. In most instances (75%), the luminal epithelial cells undergo malignant change. In 19% of cases, a dual epithelial/myoepithelial differentiated carcinoma is seen. Pure myoepithelial malignant change is seen in only 6% of cases.Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma constitutes 99% of all cases of malignant mixed tumors; it develops in 6% of all pleomorphic adenomas. It constitutes 3.6-4% of all salivary gland tumors and 12% of all malignant salivary gland tumors.Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is seen in patients in the sixth to seventh decades of life.[2, 7] Gender preference has been variably reported in different series.[8, 7, 2] Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is rarely encountered in patients younger than 30 years and is rarely seen in children.[9, 10] The average median age at onset is 61 to 67 years; this median age at onset is 10 to 20 years older than the median age of patients with pleomorphic adenoma, lending support to the view that longstanding tumors are more prone to malignant change.

Etiology

Malignant transformation may occur up to 50 years after a pleomorphic adenoma is first diagnosed; the average period before malignant transformation is 20 years. The exact etiologic factors associated with malignant transformation are largely ill defined; however, exposure to radiation is thought to be a factor. It is also thought that malignant change may result from the development and accumulation of genetic instabilities within the tumor.[12]

A study by Hu et al suggests that promoter methylation of the p16 gene may be linked with the malignant evolution of pleomorphic adenoma to carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. The increased expression in the cytoplasm of p16 protein combined with the decreased expression in the nucleus of this same protein may lead to this transformation.[13]

Interestingly, the rate of occurrence seems to increase with increases in the period during which pleomorphic adenoma is left untreated.[11] According to some investigators, the rate of malignant change is 1.5% in the first year in which the adenoma goes untreated; it increases to 9.5% after 15 years.

Location

Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma more commonly occurs in the major salivary glands than in the minor salivary glands.

Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is most frequently seen in the parotid gland (67%); the submandibular gland is less frequently involved (15%). The sublingual gland is involved in only 1% of cases.[3, 4]

Fine-needle aspiration is generally one of the first steps taken in diagnosing a salivary gland mass. It is interesting to note that carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma tends to occur in the deep lobe of the parotid, in contrast to most pleomorphic adenomas, which tend to occur in the superficial lobe.[8] This fact may account for the low preoperative diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma.

In the minor salivary glands, the palate is the most common site of occurrence.[14, 5, 15, 16, 17]

Clinical Features and Imaging

The patient usually presents with a history of a slowly growing, painless mass[18, 19] that suddenly or over a short period enlarges rapidly. Patients usually present with symptoms and signs suggesting malignancy (eg, fixation to surrounding structures,[11] occasional pain, skin infiltration, trismus,[8] facial nerve weakness, or palsy[20] ). Facial nerve weakness or palsy has been detected in approximately 23-40% of cases.[21, 22, 23]

Some patients with carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma have a history of multiple previous surgeries for pleomorphic adenoma[18] ; such a history might suggest the possibility of malignant transformation. This is relevant, considering the fact that some cases of very well-differentiated epithelial malignancy (eg, myoepithelial carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma) are sometimes not fully appreciated. Careful observation of the resected tumor may reveal malignancy.[24]

Gross Findings

Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenomas vary considerably in size; sizes may range from 1 cm to greater than 20 cm. Macroscopic features that suggest malignant transformation in pleomorphic adenoma include poorly defined and/or infiltrative tumor margins,[3] the presence of foci of hemorrhage, and necrosis. However, some malignant tumors are well circumscribed[18, 25] (eg, noninvasive or minimally invasive varieties).

Microscopic Findings

The most common malignant epithelial subtype seen in carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS). Almost all other malignant varieties of salivary gland tumors have been described (eg, undifferentiated carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, salivary duct carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, myoepithelial carcinoma, and epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma).[26, 3, 18, 20, 11, 26, 27] The percentage of the malignant component varies widely; in some instances, the locations of the original benign pleomorphic adenoma are difficult to ascertain (see Media files 1-4).[28]

Undifferentiated carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma.Undifferentiated carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. Image A: In the right upper side of the photomicrograph, an undifferentiated carcinoma is seen infiltrating into the benign pleomorphic adenoma component, which appears on the left side of the photomicrograph. Image B: At higher magnification, the undifferentiated carcinoma shows pleomorphic tumor cells with focally vacuolated cytoplasm. A dark, star-shaped mitotic figure is readily apparent in the middle of the photomicrograph.Salivary duct carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. ImSalivary duct carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. Image A: The malignant portion of the tumor is shown with the characteristic cribriform pattern and central comedo necrosis—characteristics usually seen in salivary duct carcinoma. Image B: The right side of the image shows a benign pleomorphic adenoma. Note the metastatic tumor emboli from the malignant component seen in Image A in the peritumoral vessels (arrows).Adenoid cystic carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. IAdenoid cystic carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. Image A: Adenoid cystic carcinoma surrounds and infiltrates the chondroid stroma (asterisk sign) of the adjacent benign pleomorphic adenoma. Note that the tumor appears to still be within the confines of the original tumor fibrous capsule surrounding the circumference. Image B: At higher magnification, the characteristic cribriform (Swiss cheese) pattern of adenoid cystic carcinoma with intervening reduplicated and hyalinized basal lamina is apparent.Myoepithelial carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. ImMyoepithelial carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. Image A: The tumor is infiltrating the myxoid stroma of pleomorphic adenoma and almost completely replaces the substance of the benign tumor. Note the bland nature of the tumor cells in this malignancy; this may cause difficulties in recognizing malignancy in small tissue biopsy specimens, particularly in light of the fact that myoepithelial cells are a constituent of pleomorphic adenoma cell populations. Image B: The malignant nature of the tumor is obvious in this image. Note how the tumor extends into the surrounding tissue, infiltrating it in cords and in single cell files.

Although in most instances, the features of malignant transformation are evident, some very well-differentiated cancers (eg, myoepithelial carcinoma) or cancers that exhibit morphologically limited nuclear atypia may be somewhat challenging to evaluate for the presence of malignancy.[24]

Clinical experience has engendered an appreciation of the evolution of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma over time. Presentations vary and may include the following: carcinoma in situ, in which atypical nuclei replace the ductal luminal layer while the not atypical myoepithelial layer is retained focally or multifocally[29, 30, 31] ; carcinoma that breaks from the confines of the myoepithelial layer to invade the surrounding stroma while remaining intracapsular; and frankly invasive cancer that extends beyond the capsule of the pleomorphic adenoma.[18, 32]

Tumors that invade beyond the capsule into the surrounding tissue by less than 1.5 cm are considered minimally invasive; overall, patients with this form of disease have an excellent prognosis. Those tumors that invade beyond 1.5 cm are considered invasive; with such tumors, prognoses vary in accordance with tumor stage and grade.[27] Tumors should be carefully evaluated with regard to the degree of invasion of tumor, because treatment will vary accordingly.

The grade of the cells seen in the cancerous epithelial component varies from well differentiated to poorly differentiated to anaplastic, depending on the cancerous subtype. Most carcinomas are high grade, but some are low grade. However, the histologic grades of the tumor should be judged according to how the carcinomatous category is usually graded in an individual tumor. For example, a mucoepidermoid carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is histologically categorized as being of low, intermediate, or high grade histologically, as is done in the case of a mucoepidermoid carcinoma occurring as an individual tumor.

Perineural invasion[18] and angiovascular invasion are commonly encountered in the invasive types; necrosis is prominent in the high-grade types

mmunohistochemistry

Determining the different types of cells in the tumor by use of immunohistochemistry may aid in establishing an accurate diagnosis Tumor markers are described in the eMedicine article Pleomorphic Adenoma. However, specific additional markers have occasionally proven useful in cases of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. Immunoreactivity for p53 was observed by some authors to be a useful tool in differentiating pleomorphic adenoma from carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. Indeed, some authors have reported that p53 may be used as a means of early detection of malignant change in pleomorphic adenoma[33, 34, 35, 29, 36] ; other authors, however, have disputed this claim.

Immunoreactivity (overexpression) for HER2 (c-erbB-2) has been used by some investigators to differentiate carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma from atypical pleomorphic adenoma[36, 37, 38, 39] ; others have found no significant correlation. Immunoreactivity for cyclin A and its increased expression have also been noted by some investigators to correlate with the development of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma.[40]

Recently, expression of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) (a protein that is associated with aggressive behavior in tumors) was studied in both pleomorphic adenoma and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma.[41] The results indicated an increase in the expression of XIAP from pleomorphic adenoma to cellular pleomorphic adenoma to carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma, or even atypical areas within pleomorphic adenoma. Such findings suggest that XIAP expression may be an additional marker to aid in the evaluation of malignant change in pleomorphic adenoma.

Molecular/Genetics

Rearrangements of chromosome 8q12 and alterations in chromosome 12q13-15 with amplification of HMGIC, HMGA2 and MDM2 genes are frequent and may contribute to malignant transformation.[42, 43]

Deletions of chromosome 5 have been reported, as have alterations in chromosome 17q and 6q deletion.

p53 alterations are seen in 29-75% of cases, and p53 overexpression is seen in 41-75% of cases, suggesting that p53 plays a role in the development of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma.[36]

HER2/neu (c-erbB-2) overexpression or gene amplification occurs in 21-82% of cases.[36, 39] The role HER2/neu remains controversial.[36]

Tumor Spread and Staging

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)[44] staging system for malignant tumors of the major salivary glands (ie, the parotid, submandibular, sublingual glands) is as follows:

Table. TNM classification (Open Table in a new window)

T- Primary tumor
Tx Primary tumor cannot be assessed
T0 No evidence of primary tumor
T1 Tumor 2 cm or less in greatest dimension without extraparenchymal extension
T2 Tumor more than 2 cm but not more than 4 cm in greatest dimension without extraparenchymal extension
T3 Tumor more than 4 cm and/or tumor having extraparenchymal extension
T4a Tumor invades skin, mandible, ear canal, and/or facial nerve
T4b Tumor invades skull base and/or pterygoid plates and/or carotid artery
N- Regional lymph nodes
NX Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0 No regional lymph node metastasis
N1 Metastasis into a single ipsilateral lymph node, 3 cm or less in greatest dimension
N2 Metastasis into a single ipsilateral lymph node, greater than 3 cm in greatest dimension but not greater than 6 cm in greatest dimension, or in multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes, none greater than 6 cm in greatest dimension, or in bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, none greater than 6 cm in greatest dimension
N3 Metastasis in a lymph node greater than 6 cm in greatest dimension
M- Distant metastasis
MX Distant metastasis cannot be assessed
M0 No distant metastasis
M1 Distant metastasis

Table. Stage grouping (Open Table in a new window)

Stage Grouping
Stage I T1 N0 M0
Stage II T2 N0 M0
Stage III T3 N0 M0
T1 N1 M0
T2 N1 M0
T3 N1 M0
Stage IVA T4a N0 M0
T4a N1 M0
T1 N2 M0
T2 N2 M0
T3 N2 M0
T4a N2 M0
Stage IVB T4b Any N M0
Any T N3 M0
Stage IVC Any T Any N M1

Tumor spread can occur by direct extension and lymphovascular or perineural invasion. As mentioned above, the tumor can be histologically divided on the basis of temporal evolution into the following:

  • Carcinoma in situ
  • Intracapsular carcinoma
  • Minimally invasive (1.5 cm or less extension beyond the capsule)
  • Invasive/widely invasive (greater than 1.5 cm extension beyond the capsule)

For carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma arising in the minor salivary glands, staging is determined in accordance with the system of the region of occurrence.

Prognosis and Predictive Factors

Patients with noninvasive and minimally invasive tumors have an excellent prognosis; for these tumors, the metastatic potential is very low.[45, 32]Tumors in the invasive category tend to behave in a more aggressive fashion; up to 25-50% of patients experience recurrence,[3, 7, 18] and up to 60-70% of patients develop local or distant metastasis.[3] Metastatic sites include lymph nodes, bone (especially vertebral bodies), and the brain.

The stage of the disease plays an important role in prognosis. Patients with stage I disease generally have an excellent prognosis, whereas the survival rate for patients with stage IV disease is extremely poor. A recent study of 22 patients with CXPA confirmed this general tendency.[21] In that study, both the 5-year disease-specific and overall survival rates were 60%; the recurrence-free survival rate after 5 years was 85%. Interestingly, in this series, the incidence of higher-stage disease correlated with older age (the average age of patients with stage IV disease was 67 years), whereas lower-stage disease correlated with younger age (the average age of patients with stage I or II disease was 53 years).

The survival rate has been correlated with the size, type, and histologic grade of cancer, particularly with regard to the widely invasive types. Patients with undifferentiated carcinoma have the worst survival rate (30%); those with polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma have the highest survival rate (96%).[26]

0
回复

limo 离线

帖子:98
粉蓝豆:8
经验:371
注册时间:2010-11-02
加关注  |  发消息
15 楼    发表于2011-11-18 17:36:35举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 limo 于 2011-11-18 17:40:20 编辑

http://www.ipathology.cn/channel/detail/name/bbs/article/404022.html

两例互为补充,不知道年龄有没有可比性,本例年龄轻,可能还需要多取材做工作。文献说发生率在多形性腺瘤中占6%,一般年龄比较大,60岁以上,30岁以下比较少见,就是这个Carcinoma Ex Pleomorphic Adenoma 咋翻译呢啊,咱们翻译为恶性多形性腺瘤但是感觉还是有点信息不足的问题 “EX”是个啥意思呢。

所以本例谨慎,但是另外一例又怎样呢。

镜下主要是

The most common malignant epithelial subtype seen in carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS)最常见的是低分化癌非特指. Almost all other malignant varieties of salivary gland tumors have been described 几乎所有其他的恶性涎腺肿瘤(eg, undifferentiated carcinoma未分化癌, squamous cell carcinoma鳞癌, mucoepidermoid carcinoma粘表, salivary duct carcinoma导管癌, adenoid cystic carcinoma腺样囊性癌, myoepithelial carcinoma肌上皮癌, and epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma上皮肌上皮癌).[26, 3, 18, 20, 11, 26, 27] The percentage of the malignant component varies widely; in some instances, the locations of the original benign pleomorphic adenoma are difficult to ascertain (see Media files 1-4).[28

0
回复

limo 离线

帖子:98
粉蓝豆:8
经验:371
注册时间:2010-11-02
加关注  |  发消息
10 楼    发表于2011-11-17 18:39:23举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

哇塞,真的是粘表,太崇拜了,哈哈

0
回复
回复:21 阅读:7156
共2页/21条首页上一页12下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接