图片: | |
---|---|
名称: | |
描述: | |
listli1999 离线
以下是引用sslm在2007-8-12 9:29:00的发言:
上皮异型增生累及范围已经超过全层2/3.CIN III.个人认为稳妥的出法是结合切片.如果类似病变广泛,直接出CIN III,如果很局限,可以出"可见小型CIN III病灶"或伴微型CIN III病变".这样就客观得多.估计会诊为CIN I多半是因为病变非常局限.尽管个人不同意CIN I. 不少老师出得过低,实际面临这样的风险:1.宫颈尚有累腺,微小浸润等病变存在,出得过低使病人失去了必要的进一步检查的机会.2.你的切片很可能在今后的某个时候受到复查,而你将因为今天的诊断不足遭受麻烦.因为CIN I和CIN III临床处理差别太大了. 很重要的是.1.严格按照诊断标准出报告,因为一旦有纠纷总有更多人会赞同你的诊断意见.2.积极会诊和坦然面对会诊,并多进行总结. |
jiangxiaoyu 离线
listli1999 离线
jiangxiaoyu 离线
以下是引用listli1999在2007-7-12 20:29:00的发言:
怎么没有多少人发表意见的,我们打的是CIN2级,本以为是相对保守了,但会诊的意见是CIN1级,大家讨论下吧 |
Can you tell me where did you sent for consultation? This is a typical high grade lesion, whatever you call it CIN2 or CI2-3 will be fine since clinical treatment will be the same. CIN 1 is definitely underdiagnosed! May I know what is the PAP cytology result?
listli1999 离线
以下是引用杨斌在2009-7-13 1:17:00的发言:
Can you tell me where did you sent for consultation? This is a typical high grade lesion, whatever you call it CIN2 or CI2-3 will be fine since clinical treatment will be the same. CIN 1 is definitely underdiagnosed! May I know what is the PAP cytology result? |
谢谢杨老师的关注,这例病人是在国内的知名的顶级的医院的病理科会诊的,具体就不说了,细胞学的结果应该是ASC-H.
以下是引用listli1999在2009-7-13 12:16:00的发言:
谢谢杨老师的关注,这例病人是在国内的知名的顶级的医院的病理科会诊的,具体就不说了,细胞学的结果应该是ASC-H.
Totally understand it. Thank you for providing cytology diagnosis. |
以下是引用杨斌在2009-7-13 1:17:00的发言:
Can you tell me where did you sent for consultation? This is a typical high grade lesion, whatever you call it CIN2 or CI2-3 will be fine since clinical treatment will be the same. CIN 1 is definitely underdiagnosed! May I know what is the PAP cytology result? 谢谢杨博士的点评. |