图片: | |
---|---|
名称: | |
描述: | |
姓 名: | ××× | 性别: | 女性 | 年龄: | 44 |
标本名称: | 盆腔肿瘤 | ||||
简要病史: | |||||
肉眼检查: |
患者女性,44岁。
病史:全子宫及左侧附件切除术后1年余,发现盆腔肿瘤3天。
1年前因子宫内膜癌行全子宫切除。现行B超示:盆腔内见10.5X9.3CM的不过则实性低回声包块,边界清,其内见丰富血流信号,右下腹可见2CM的液性暗区。MRI:子宫缺如,膀胱壁光滑,膀胱右上方见11X7X9CM的团块状回声,盆腔未见肿大淋巴结,盆腔少量积液,考虑肿瘤复发。
肉眼检查见:块状组织一堆,大小13X115CM,其中最大块大小为5X4X3CM,表面较光滑,切面灰黄色质软,呈胶冻状有粘液感,其余组织切面灰黄色质脆,中心可见灰白色软骨结节。
免疫组化:CD34多形细胞区及梭形细胞区(+),ER及PR梭形细胞区及小细胞区(+),SMA多形细胞区及梭形细胞区(-),S-100梭形细胞区及小细胞区(-),Desmin梭形细胞区及小细胞区(+),DOG1梭形细胞区(-),CD10梭形细胞区及小细胞区(+),CD117梭形细胞区(+)及多形细胞区(-)。
镜下大致分为4个区域:多形细胞区域,梭形细胞区域,软骨区域及小细胞区域。
下图为多形细胞区域
Interesting case.
Most importance is to stain several CK markers such as AE1/AE3 and Cam 5.2 to make sure if epithelial component is present in term of the name of the diatgnosis.
1. Clearly it is malignant tumor of mullerian origian (ER/PR+) and the location.
2. If cam 5.2 scattered positive, it is MMMT
3. If no any ck positive and no any glanular component, it is a high grade mullerian sarcoma .
4. Andeosarcoma is the most common among these lesions above. If you submit more sections and can see some even a few benign glands, it is a mullerian adenosarcoma with stromal over growth and cartilage differentiaton.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Feb;33(2):278-88.
Department of Pathology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Mullerian adenosarcomas are rare mixed tumors of low malignant potential that occur mainly in the uterus and also in extrauterine locations. Microscopically, they may be difficult to distinguish from adenofibromas. In this clinicopathologic study of 55 adenosarcomas, the mean patient age was 50 years (range: 13 to 83 y). Thirty-seven tumors were of the uterine corpus, 11 of the cervix, 4 of the ovary, and 1 each of the fallopian tube, vagina, and Douglas peritoneum. Abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding were the usual complaints. Treatment was known in 50 patients: 10 had polypectomy, 1 cone biopsy, and 39 hysterectomy, which was accompanied by bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in 24 and lymphadenectomy in 4. Five patients had radiotherapy and 2 of them had chemotherapy. Stage was known in 41 cases. Of 30 tumors of the uterine corpus, 17 were stage IA, 11 stage IB, 1 stage IC, and 1 stage IIIC. Four cervical tumors were stage IB. Three of the 4 ovarian tumors were stage IA and the other was stage IIIC. The tumor of the fallopian tube was stage IC, and the tumors of the vagina and recto-uterine pouch were confined to their site of origin. Most uterine tumors were polypoid masses ranging from 1 to 20 cm (mean: 6.5 cm). Microscopically, sarcomatous overgrowth was found in 18 cases (33%), heterologous elements in 13 (24%), and sex cordlike differentiation in 7 (13%). Fourteen of 30 uterine tumors (47%) had myometrial invasion that was minimal in 5, involved one-third of the myometrial thickness in 7, and more than 50% in 2. Of 4 cervical tumors, 2 were endocervical polyps, 1 invaded one-third of the cervical wall, and the other invaded its full thickness. Follow-up information (2 mo to 18 y; average: 7.5 y) was available in 29 patients. Six developed metastases and 5 of them died of tumor. Four had adenosarcomas with sarcomatous overgrowth; however, the other 2 patients had typical low-grade adenosarcomas of the uterine corpus and cervix, respectively, exhibiting only mild nuclear atypia of the stromal component and </=2 mitotic figures/10 high power fields. Both were initially underdiagnosed as adenofibromas. The finding of such cases, which raises the controversy of whether or not adenofibroma exists as a tumor entity, prompted us to make a comparative immunohistochemical analysis of 23 typical adenosarcomas, 8 adenosarcomas with sarcomatous overgrowth, and 29 benign and malignant related lesions, including 7 clinically benign adenofibromas. Adenosarcomas with sarcomatous overgrowth showed strong immunoreaction for Ki-67 and p53 and loss of CD10 and progesterone receptors immunostaining; in contrast, the immunoreaction for these tumor markers in typical adenosarcomas without sarcomatous overgrowth was similar to that of adenofibromas associated with favorable outcome and other benign lesions such as endometrial polyps and endometriosis. These findings suggest that some of the tumors currently classified as adenofibromas, on the basis of their low mitotic count and lack of significant nuclear atypia, are, in fact, well-differentiated adenosarcomas.
以下是引用cqzhao在2010-1-28 3:16:00的发言:
Interesting case. Most importance is to stain several CK markers such as AE1/AE3 and Cam 5.2 to make sure if epithelial component is present in term of the name of the diatgnosis. 1. Clearly it is malignant tumor of mullerian origian (ER/PR+) and the location. 2. If cam 5.2 scattered positive, it is MMMT 3. If no any ck positive and no any glanular component, it is a high grade mullerian sarcoma . 4. Andeosarcoma is the most common among these lesions above. If you submit more sections and can see some even a few benign glands, it is a mullerian adenosarcoma with stromal over growth and cartilage differentiaton. |