图片: | |
---|---|
名称: | |
描述: | |
以下是引用Danrs在2009-9-15 21:34:00的发言:
细胞学,核大深染,我觉得还是恶性的可能大。到底是鳞状上皮来源还是腺体来的,似乎更像腺体。 后面的切片,不知道是怎么来的,似乎只有腺体,看不到间质。如果是宫颈脱落细胞的离心沉淀包埋切片,腺体居然还能保存这么好。腺体不像正常的宫颈腺上皮,但是个别细胞也像粘液腺上皮。考虑宫颈来源的。 |
I did some IHC for the cell block. Considering the cost-effect, it is not necessary to do IHC now because patient will have biopsy soon. IHC can be do for biopsy specimen if needed.
The glandular cells in cell block are negative for p53, WT1, and ER, and positive for p16. I did these IHC and try to know the carcinoma types (serous, endometrioid) and origins (endocervical or endometrial).(我用细胞腊快做了一些免疫组化。因为病人很快会有活检;考虑到成本,免疫组化不是必须的,如果确实需要我们会用活检标本再做。在细胞腊块中的腺细胞p53, WT1, 和ER都是阴性;而P16阳性。我做这些免疫组化想知道癌症类型<浆液性,内膜来源>和原发部位<颈管或内膜>)
liguoxia71 离线
I think most of you had very reasonable interpretation based on the Pap photos. Bottomline is the women should have tissue sampling. It is too undercall if we call ascus for these kinds atypical cells within the backgrouding of blood.
Friday I signed out this case as AGC-favor neoplasm and ASC-H. The clusters of cells are more like glandular lesion. Two single cells and the second cluster show some squamous features as 掌心0164 mentioned. Anyway Friday I discussed the case with primary doctor and told him that I thought it was adenocarcinoma case and patient should have endometrial and endocervial sampling even I released the case with AGC-N and ASC-H. However I am not sure the origin, endometrial or endocervical, even though it may be a cervical orgin based on the age of 45. (基于照片我认为大家绝大部分人的解释是合理的;底线是这个病人必须做组织活检。在这种血性背景下这些类型的非典型细胞,如果我们叫ASCUS是不够的。礼拜五,我签发这个病例为AGC-FN和ASC-H。那些成团的细胞更像腺上皮的病变。两个单个细胞和第二图的细胞团显示了一些鳞状细胞的特征。还有礼拜五我跟我的住院医生讨论这个病案的时候;即使我报的是AGC-FN和ASC-H,但是我认为是一个腺癌病例必须有内膜和颈管的活检。即使由于45岁的年龄可能来源宫颈;但是我不能肯定原发部位:内膜或颈管)掌心0164翻译