共7页/121条首页上一页123下一页尾页
回复:122 阅读:15378
形态学难以诊断的卵巢类癌

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2009-09-12 02:56|举报|关注(1)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复

57 y AA women/L ov mass 8x6x4 cm. This is the AFIP case in Jan 1974. Dr. Henry J Nosrr was Chair of Gynecology/breast Department at AFIP. He and his colleques reviewed the case, and also sent the case to MGH for second oppinion. The case was reviewed by Dr. Robert E. Scully and Dr. Stanley J. Robboy. I found the case in 2004 for immunostain research of ovarian sex cord stroma tumors and noticed their original interpretation for this case.Remember that there were no immuno atains in 1974. They had different oppinion and no final conclusion about this case.

I would like to share this case with our Chinese pathologists.

1. Know how difficult for some cases if there is no immunostain

2. To learn the concept of these world leading pathologists.

3. Hope our patholgoists know these greast pathologists. Welcome some ones to write some brief introduction for these pathologists,Robert E. Scully, Henry J Nosrr, Stanley J. Robboy. All of them are alive

4. Try yourself and you may have a better diagnosis than these experts. Ha, ha.

cz

标签:
本帖最后由 于 2010-06-09 23:19:00 编辑
0
添加参考诊断
×参考诊断
  

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
1 楼    发表于2009-09-12 02:59:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 I cannot paste photos and will try later. Sorry. cz
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
2 楼    发表于2009-09-12 07:39:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-09-12 07:42:00 编辑  I am trying to send the photos agian

名称:图1
描述:图1

名称:图2
描述:图2

名称:图3
描述:图3

名称:图4
描述:图4

名称:图5
描述:图5
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
3 楼    发表于2009-09-12 07:50:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 There are more than 10 slides for this tumor. Most areas of the tumor look like first three photos, and focal areas like photos 4 and 5 (low and high power). So above photos represent the entire tumor. Now you can guess the diagnosis or have differential diagnosis. Your performance may be better than Drs. Scully, Norris or Robboy.

I will tell you their interpretation in 1974 after you have your oppinion. In the end I will show you the IHC results I did in 2005 (30 years later).

0
回复

fangg 离线

帖子:1426
粉蓝豆:44
经验:1863
注册时间:2007-01-22
加关注  |  发消息
4 楼    发表于2009-09-12 10:19:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 excellent slides!

Sex cord tumor with annular tubules should be considered first.

1

duoduoxi..
回复
signature
境随心转

lpath 离线

帖子:79
粉蓝豆:78
经验:183
注册时间:2009-07-15
加关注  |  发消息
5 楼    发表于2009-09-12 18:39:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 我瞎猜

1.性索间质肿瘤:支持细胞瘤或环小管性索瘤

2.卵巢子宫内膜样癌有时也会表现出性索样结构

0
回复
signature
认真工作,快乐生活。

wfbjwt 离线

帖子:6628
粉蓝豆:163
经验:7418
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
6 楼    发表于2009-09-12 18:57:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 哈哈,都试一试谁比世界顶级专家厉害!

形态很善良,良性或低度恶性。乱猜了:类癌。其实如果能选2个,第二个是支持细胞瘤。

0
回复
signature
嫁人就嫁灰太狼,学习要上华夏网。

wangdingding 离线

帖子:1474
粉蓝豆:98
经验:6042
注册时间:2006-10-19
加关注  |  发消息
7 楼    发表于2009-09-12 19:06:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 倾向支持细胞肿瘤
0
回复

liguoxia71 离线

帖子:4174
粉蓝豆:3122
经验:4677
注册时间:2007-04-01
加关注  |  发消息
8 楼    发表于2009-09-12 22:13:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 倾向支持细胞瘤。
0
回复
signature
三人行,必有我师焉,择其善者而从之,其不善者而改之。

96298 离线

帖子:421
粉蓝豆:16
经验:423
注册时间:2009-03-08
加关注  |  发消息
9 楼    发表于2009-09-13 11:54:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 血管多,我会考虑类癌的。
0
回复

wfbjwt 离线

帖子:6628
粉蓝豆:163
经验:7418
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
10 楼    发表于2009-09-13 12:06:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 我能感觉赵老师的意思,如果按形态诊断,多半都要错了,楼下的猜得越离谱越可能就对了。呵呵
0
回复
signature
嫁人就嫁灰太狼,学习要上华夏网。

yourself 离线

帖子:663
粉蓝豆:7132
经验:691
注册时间:2007-06-30
加关注  |  发消息
11 楼    发表于2009-09-14 22:59:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 支持细胞瘤。我遇见一例跟本例形态基本相同。
0
回复

abin 离线

帖子:7412
粉蓝豆:6014
经验:11783
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
12 楼    发表于2009-09-14 23:44:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 Dr. Henry J Nosrr , Dr. Robert E. Scully and Dr. Stanley J. Robboy.

我知道一些,他们都是顶级妇科病理专家,尤其崇敬Scully

我基本同意fangg:环状小管性索肿瘤。

但是Dr.zhao说了,主要结构是前三张图,那么修正一下诊断:Sertoli细胞瘤,部分伴有环状小管结构。

鉴别诊断如Dr.Young以前的一篇经典文献中所述,在此从略。

0
回复
signature

华夏病理/粉蓝医疗

为基层医院病理科提供全面解决方案,

努力让人人享有便捷准确可靠的病理诊断服务。


cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
13 楼    发表于2009-09-20 06:17:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用wfbjwt在2009-9-13 12:06:00的发言:

 我能感觉赵老师的意思,如果按形态诊断,多半都要错了,楼下的猜得越离谱越可能就对了。呵呵

You are smart person, but you may be wrong this time. ha, ha.
0
回复

茉莉花开 离线

帖子:526
粉蓝豆:12
经验:2772
注册时间:2009-06-21
加关注  |  发消息
14 楼    发表于2009-10-07 11:33:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 猜一个:卵巢Wolff管肿瘤
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
15 楼    发表于2009-10-16 11:34:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 This cases is here for a long time. Thank above interpretaion.

Dr. Norris at AFIP signed the case originally in January 14, 1974. His differential diagnosis included sertoli cell tumor (SCT) and carcinoid, but he favorred carcinoid. He had a long discussion in his report. Also the case was discussed in department conference.

Dr. Norris is an excellent gyn/breast pathologist and worked for about 30 years in gyn/breast department  at AFIP and was the Chair of the department for many years(longest chair in the department). He did a lot of important research in the areas of gyn/breast pathology. Dr. Kurman once worked at AFIP and was Dr. Norris's staff pathologist for a few years in the late 1970th. In the early 1990 he retired from AFIP and Worked in a group in Florida. Tavassoli became the Chair after Dr. Norris retired from AFIP. Now Dr. Norris completely retired and enjoys his life in Florida.

Do you agree with Dr. Norris's interpretation for this case?

0
回复

镜下乾坤 离线

帖子:231
粉蓝豆:85
经验:785
注册时间:2009-09-18
加关注  |  发消息
16 楼    发表于2009-10-24 10:33:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 支持细胞瘤。
0
回复
signature
方寸见世界,镜下定乾坤。

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
17 楼    发表于2009-11-03 03:28:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 

Dr. Norris sent the case to MGH, Harvard.

The interpretation from Dr. Robert E. Scully (Dr. Robert Young was his fellow) at the MGH: Favor a SCT over a carcinoid because of the very prominent solid tubular architecture. The nuclei do not look exactly right for a SCT, but overall picture is more in favor  of it.

Anyway he though it was sertoli cell tumor.

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
18 楼    发表于2009-11-03 03:31:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-11-03 03:37:00 编辑         Dr. Stanley J. Robboy (carcinoid expert) currently is at Duke and is the president of CAP from this month for one year.

He was at MGH at that time. He reviewed the case and wrote the report:

 

I have looked at the seven EM photos and believe that the granules differ from those in carcinoid.

 

 

cz:

Basically he did not think it was carcinoid.

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
19 楼    发表于2009-11-03 03:34:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-11-03 03:36:00 编辑  

Dr. Norris: Final Long  Letter to Contributor pathologist (March. 21, 1974).( I copied parts to you)

-In talking to these fellows at a meeting last week, I took the position that the lesion might be a carcinoid, and they got rather upset. They hold their view strongly the lesion is a SCT.

-I think we should keep the diagnosis open and see if we definitely resolve with time whether or not the lesion is a SCT or carcinoid

 

cz: 

At that time, Dr. Norris though mostly it was an carcinoid case. However most pathologists in the gynecologic department at AFIP were agaist him.

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
20 楼    发表于2009-11-03 05:06:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 In 2004, I did the research project of IHC of ovarian sex cord stromal tumor at AFIP and  found this case.

I did many stains and showed you some in the following

0
回复
回复:122 阅读:15378
共7页/121条首页上一页123下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接