图片: | |
---|---|
名称: | |
描述: | |
这7张图片全部是AGC-NOS的教学图片。把原文解释摘抄以下;不好意思;水平有限没有办法进一步解释。
1、Pictured is a sheet of endocervical cells with slightly disordered architecture, slight depth of focus to group, abundant cytoplasm, uniform, bland chromatin pattern and prominent nucleoli in each nucleus. The diagnosis of atypia may arise due to depth of focus to the group and slightly disordered architecture. Biopsy - Inflammatory Atypia - 60X
2、Atypical cells with abundant cytoplasm maintaining a low N/C ratio. Biopsy: Endocervical polyp
3、A well organized, flat sheet of glandular cells in a "school of fish" arrangement. Biopsy: Decidual changes
4、The specimen contains a rounded up (3-dimensional) group of endocervical cells with slight disruption to architecture. Nuclei are all similar in size and nuclear membranes are smooth to slightly irregular. - Biopsy - Chronic Inflammation - 60x
5、The nuclei in this group exhibit nuclear membranes with slight irregularities and thickening. Biopsy: Decidual changes
6、A loose grouping of endocervical cells exhibits an apparent loss of polarity. Nuclei are round to oval with slight nuclear membrane irregularities and slight crowding. The chromatin is granular but evenly distributed and prominent nucleoli are present. Biopsy - Chronic Inflammation - 60x
7、Nuclei contain single to multiple nucleoli that are small to moderate in size. Biopsy: Decidual changes
法师兄谦虚了.正确答案目前只有掌心有.网络读片是有相当难度的,何况仅此一图且无资料:一,确实相当考实力,如果没有实力,基本不敢回贴.比如象我,张张看起来都差不多,麻烦哦.二,确实相当考胆量,如果没有胆量,基本不敢回贴.比如象我,犹豫了很多天,实在捱不过去了才回了个贴,麻烦哦.
.
华夏宫颈细胞学栏的观点是:无论是专家还是非专家,无论资历深浅学识高低,看贴回贴都不要有什么顾虑,只管回个意见,对错交给楼主去评判.对了,我们认为:运气好啊;错了,我们认为:胜败乃兵家常事.如果我们认为平时的在这里看些细胞学图片尚属"网上谈兵"的话,那么在工作中就该是"真枪实弹",二者多少还是有些区别的.
.
如此,咱们何不:胆子再大一些,步子再快一些,上线再勤一些,打字再多一些......还有哪些?
.
这些图都是腺细胞的问题吗?第一图:应该考虑腺癌:细胞团周边的的细胞增大,核空亮,核膜厚而不规则,核仁大而突出,细胞界限不清,中间的细胞重叠看不清结构,故考虑腺癌;第二图:细胞界限清楚,核大,核膜厚而不规则,染色质成块分布不均,考虑鳞癌;第三图似乎是非典型未成熟化生细胞,考虑ASC-H ;第四图ASC-H或HSIL;第五图:仍然是没有明显的核仁,但细胞团看起来像腺细胞的问题,考虑HSIL或SCC;第六图:腺癌;第七图:还是考虑HSIL或SCC。
这么好的帖子回的人不多我来顶一下,我所说的都是猜测,没确凿的依据,等正确答案出来了,我的思路也许可以成为一个反面经验,大家就不会犯同样的错误了,不是还有专门的误诊学吗?