共7页/131条首页上一页12345下一页尾页
回复:132 阅读:20099
卵巢Sertoliform (or sex cord-like) variant of 子宫内膜样癌 (cqz-3)

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2009-08-24 05:27|举报|关注(2)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复
姓    名: ××× 性别:   年龄:  
标本名称:  
简要病史:  
肉眼检查:  
  • 卵巢Sertoliform (or sex cord-like) variant of 子宫内膜样癌 (cqz-3)图1
    图1
  • 卵巢Sertoliform (or sex cord-like) variant of 子宫内膜样癌 (cqz-3)图2
    图2
  • 卵巢Sertoliform (or sex cord-like) variant of 子宫内膜样癌 (cqz-3)图3
    图3
  • 卵巢Sertoliform (or sex cord-like) variant of 子宫内膜样癌 (cqz-3)图4
    图4
标签:
本帖最后由 城北 于 2020-04-19 19:50:45 编辑
1
×参考诊断
伴有性索样结构特征的子宫内膜样癌

csx学习 离线

帖子:198
粉蓝豆:5
经验:605
注册时间:2009-08-21
加关注  |  发消息
41 楼    发表于2009-08-26 16:00:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 颗粒细胞瘤
0
回复

贝壳 离线

帖子:28
粉蓝豆:1
经验:28
注册时间:2009-06-25
加关注  |  发消息
42 楼    发表于2009-08-26 23:20:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 形态上考虑颗粒细胞瘤,需免疫组化标记有没有支持细胞成分。
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
43 楼    发表于2009-08-27 06:01:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 wq_9603, liguoxia71 , and others had good analysis. However please open your mind to have more differential dx.
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
44 楼    发表于2009-08-27 06:03:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用liguoxia71在2009-8-26 15:38:00的发言:

 图2有灶状坏死,图3核分裂较多,应该是恶度不低的肿瘤。除了颗粒细胞瘤、支持细胞瘤,如果是内分泌肿瘤,有可能是不典型类癌。

Unlike lung carcinoid there is no good classification for ovarian carcinoid in term of my knowledge.
0
回复

mingfuyu 离线

帖子:1008
粉蓝豆:1019
经验:1066
注册时间:2008-04-10
加关注  |  发消息
45 楼    发表于2009-08-27 07:02:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 Agree.  In addition,  the upper left photo is typical adenocarcinoma, to my eyes

The upper right and lower left appear similar,  same type with low and high power?  The right lower looks different again. Could this be a collision tumor of different kinds?

0
回复

有福不在忙 离线

帖子:2161
粉蓝豆:42
经验:3448
注册时间:2008-11-22
加关注  |  发消息
46 楼    发表于2009-08-27 08:47:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 排除一下子宫内膜样腺癌,做CEA,CK7,CK20,INHIBITION,ER,PR,VIMENTIN。
0
回复
signature
有福不在忙

天天田田 离线

帖子:493
粉蓝豆:5
经验:493
注册时间:2009-05-15
加关注  |  发消息
47 楼    发表于2009-08-27 20:41:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 1.颗粒细胞瘤。

 2.类癌。

 3.sertoli-leydig肿瘤。

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
48 楼    发表于2009-08-28 01:22:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 Thank above a lot of very good analysis.

Summary above discussion:

Differential diagnosis (DDX):

1. Sex cord stromal tumor. If it is sex cord tumor, what type? granulosa tumor vs sertoli cell tumor.

2. Carcinoid tumor.

3. Primary epithelial tumor. What type? Serous, endometrioid

4. Metastatic tumor. From where?

I think this is good DDX. We must work with IHC stains. I have full panel of IHC results and will paste here next week.

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
49 楼    发表于2009-08-28 01:30:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-08-28 01:32:00 编辑

 Now we have our DDX. I can tell you this is an ovarian primary tumor,not metastatic one. Also this is one tumor with different growth patterns, not a mixed tumor.

1. Before I show the IHC results, please give one guess diagnosis, only one dx. What dianosis do you favor based on the H&E slide?

2. What IHC stains do you want to order to distinguish sex cord tumor from carcinoid and epithelial tumor?

Thanks,

cz 

0
回复

强子 离线

帖子:950
粉蓝豆:535
经验:1218
注册时间:2007-10-28
加关注  |  发消息
50 楼    发表于2009-08-28 08:42:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 mingfuyu老师意见:

 在我看来,左上图是典型的腺癌。右上和左下看上去是一样的,但是低倍和高倍是相同的吗?右下的图好像又不一样了。难道是碰撞瘤?


0
回复
signature
赚点散碎银子养家,乐呵呵的穿衣吃饭

强子 离线

帖子:950
粉蓝豆:535
经验:1218
注册时间:2007-10-28
加关注  |  发消息
51 楼    发表于2009-08-28 08:55:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 quhong老师意见:此肿瘤具有不同的生长方式,包括图一的明显腺样分化和图四的小梁型结构。图二图三很难讲。我倾向于微滤泡结构上的筛状结构。看不到典型的Call-Exner小体(典型的Call-Exner小体应该是由颗粒细胞组成的,中央为嗜酸性物质)和具有核沟的咖啡豆样核。不首选颗粒细胞瘤,但是不能除外。 类癌与支持细胞瘤也要注意鉴别。转移性肿瘤也不能除外. 此病例较难,超出我能力了……(谦逊之词……)
0
回复
signature
赚点散碎银子养家,乐呵呵的穿衣吃饭

强子 离线

帖子:950
粉蓝豆:535
经验:1218
注册时间:2007-10-28
加关注  |  发消息
52 楼    发表于2009-08-28 08:57:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 看到这里,我有点感触:《女性生殖道病理学》中关于颗粒细胞瘤中,讲到Call-Exner小体时候,首先讲到的就是要和腺癌的腺管鉴别,我当时还考虑,有必要吗?事实教育了我啊……

0
回复
signature
赚点散碎银子养家,乐呵呵的穿衣吃饭

wfbjwt 离线

帖子:6628
粉蓝豆:163
经验:7418
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
53 楼    发表于2009-08-28 12:35:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 看了几天,没敢发言,有点看不懂。经过zhao老师提示,感觉应是颗粒细胞瘤,颗粒细胞瘤的组织形态类型比较多,如小梁、岛屿、弥漫、小管等等,可以一种为主,常混合存在,此例可见CALL-EXNAL小体,即混合着小滤泡型。免疫组化好像抑制素、CD10阳性,没开展这些项目,记不清了,鉴别诊断SYN、CK阴性,期待结果。
0
回复
signature
嫁人就嫁灰太狼,学习要上华夏网。

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
54 楼    发表于2009-08-28 19:05:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 As above mentioned, granulosa cell tumors (GCT) have  many growth patterns, frequently mixed. CALL-EXNAL小体 often is present in microfollicular pattern. In fact follicular patterns (micro or macro-) have been emphasized in the literature, but are less common than ther others in aggregates.

What percentage of GCTs have CALL-EXNAL小体. I cannot find the answer. Do Some ones can find the percentage with reference? Please paste here. Thank, cz.

By the way I do not meam this case is a GCT or not

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
55 楼    发表于2009-08-28 19:06:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 What is the most common structure or growth pattern in ovarian sertoli cell tumor?
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
56 楼    发表于2009-08-28 19:12:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用quhong在2009-8-27 21:15:00的发言:

 This tumor demonstrates variety of patterns, including overt glandular differentiation (figure 1) and trabecular pattern (figure 4). The figure 2 and 3 are difficult to define. I favor cribriform pattern over microfollicular pattern. I do not see typical Call-Exner bodies (follicular structures composed of granulosa cells arranged around a central eosinophilic hyaline or fibrillar material) and coffee beans (cells with longitudinal nuclear groove).  Granulosa cell tumor is not favored, but cannot be ruled out. Carcinoid tumor and Sertoli cell tumor should also be in differential diangosis. Metastatic tumor cannot be excluded, either. This is a difficult case. It is really above my pay grade.

Thank Dr. quhong's (my best friend and classmate)'s input. Dr. quhong is an GU expert pathologist. This tumor is related to your major.
0
回复

wfbjwt 离线

帖子:6628
粉蓝豆:163
经验:7418
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
57 楼    发表于2009-08-28 19:15:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用cqzhao在2009-8-28 19:06:00的发言:

 What is the most common structure or growth pattern in ovarian sertoli cell tumor?

小管,实性细胞巢最常见吧。
0
回复
signature
嫁人就嫁灰太狼,学习要上华夏网。

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
58 楼    发表于2009-08-28 19:18:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用Liu_Aijun在2009-8-27 8:52:00的发言:

左上图:明确的腺管样结构:支持细胞瘤?类癌?腺癌?

右上图和左下图:同一形态不同倍数,腺管样或CE小体结构:支持细胞瘤?粒层细胞瘤?腺癌?

右下图:梁索结构:支持细胞瘤?粒层细胞瘤?类癌?

综合考虑:1,性索间质肿瘤:(1)支持细胞瘤,(2)两性母细胞瘤,(3)不考虑单纯的粒层细胞瘤。

2,支持细胞瘤与类癌混合性肿瘤。

3,最后需排除宫内膜样腺癌(整体感觉不象腺癌)。

建议标记物:inhibin, EMA, syn,CgA

Thank Dr. Liu's good analysis. We all should learn from Dr. Liu.

It is correct way to analyze a case-morphology observation, differential diagnosis, immunostains.

For these kinds of cases if you only give one diagnosis even right answer, still it is not correct way.

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
59 楼    发表于2009-08-29 01:05:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

  In term of morphologic study, this is the best and largest paper to describe ov sertoli cell tumor. If you want to know the morphologic features well, please read the original paper. I remeber that I once pasted this abstract some where in the web.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Feb;29(2):143-56.

Sertoli cell tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 54 cases.

James Wright Pathology Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. eoliva@partners.org

Ovarian Sertoli cell tumors are rare, and their morphologic spectrum, behavior, and factors influencing the latter are not clearly established. They may be mimicked by many different tumors, some of them more frequent than Sertoli cell tumors; immunohistochemistry may aid in this differential, but its role has not been analyzed in a large series. We studied the clinicopathologic features of 54 Sertoli cell tumors, including the immunohistochemical profile of 23 of them. The patients, 6 of whom had Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, ranged from 2 to 76 years of age (mean, 30 years). Eleven patients had estrogenic and 4 had androgenic manifestations. The tumors ranged from 0.8 to 30 cm, with the majority being in the range of 4 to 12 cm. They were all unilateral, usually solid, and often yellow. The predominant microscopic pattern was tubular, seen, albeit often only focally, in all tumors; other patterns were cords or trabeculae (28), diffuse (21), pseudopapillary (4), retiform (3), islands or alveolar arrangements (3), and spindled (3). The tubules were solid or hollow with the former being somewhat more common. Delicate septa were occasionally seen and were conspicuous in areas of one tumor. The stroma was abundant in 15 tumors with marked sclerosis in 4. The cells usually had pale to occasionally densely eosinophilic cytoplasm, but 6 tumors were composed of cells with prominent foamy cytoplasm, falling in the category of "lipid-rich" Sertoli cell tumor, and one had cells with clear non-foamy cytoplasm. Forty-four tumors were stage I (42 of them were stage Ia and 2 were stage Ic), 1 was stage II, 3 were stage III, and 6 were not adequately staged. Follow-up was available for 27 patients with stage I tumors, and all were alive and well at last follow-up except for 2 patients with stage Ia and 1 with stage Ic disease. Those 3 patients had pelvic-abdominal recurrences 18, 36, and 9 months, respectively, after the initial diagnosis. Two of the three clinically malignant stage I tumors had moderate to severe cytologic atypia and brisk mitotic activity (>5 or more mitoses/10 high power fields [HPFs]), and one of these had tumor cell necrosis. Among the 10 clinically benign stage I tumors with more than 5 years of follow-up, only 3 had >5 mitoses/10 HPFs, but none had more than mild cytologic atypia and none had tumor cell necrosis. Two of the three patients with stage III disease had follow-up information and one was alive at 16 months and the second developed splenic metastases 2 years after the initial diagnosis. Two of the three stage III tumors had at least moderate cytologic atypia and brisk mitotic activity. Immunohistochemical stains showed positivity for AE1/3-Cam5.2 in 15 of 23 tumors; Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) was negative in all the tumors. Inhibin was positive in 18 of 22 tumors, calretinin in 10 of 20, CD99 in 19 of 22, vimentin in 17 of 18, smooth muscle actin in 4 of 18, neuron specific enolase in 8 of 16, S-100 in 2 of 20, and chromogranin was negative in all 21 cases studied. Although Sertoli cell tumors usually have a distinctive tubular pattern that facilitates the diagnosis, other patterns may occasionally predominate, causing confusion with various other primary and metastatic ovarian tumors. EMA, inhibin, and chromogranin represent the most helpful triad of immunomarkers serving to exclude two common mimics of Sertoli cell tumors (endometrioid carcinoma [inhibin-; EMA+; chromogranin-] and carcinoid tumor [inhibin-; EMA+; chromogranin+]). Although CD99 and calretinin are often expressed in these tumors, they are much less specific and not as helpful in the differential diagnosis. Most Sertoli cell tumors are stage I, unilateral, cytologically bland, and clinically benign, but occasional examples are high stage, and about 11% of stage I tumors have worrisome histologic features that may portend an adverse outcome. The tumors typically occur in young females, sometimes children who typically present with sexual precocity, and occasional patients have Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

0
回复

ZZRR 离线

帖子:433
粉蓝豆:579
经验:1757
注册时间:2009-04-09
加关注  |  发消息
60 楼    发表于2009-08-24 08:56:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 颗粒细胞瘤
0
回复
signature
爱学习
回复:132 阅读:20099
共7页/131条首页上一页12345下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接