共5页/97条首页上一页12345下一页尾页
回复:100 阅读:17428
Sharing some photos of ovarian pure sertoli cell tumors

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2009-07-23 01:24|举报|关注(17)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复
姓    名: ××× 性别:   年龄:  
标本名称:  
简要病史:  
肉眼检查:  

Notice we opened this section. Just paste a few photos from 5 ovarian tumors here. Enjoy.

Case 1

  • Sharing some photos of ovarian pure sertoli cell tumors图1
    图1
  • Sharing some photos of ovarian pure sertoli cell tumors图2
    图2
标签:
本帖最后由 于 2009-08-03 08:01:00 编辑
1
添加参考诊断
×参考诊断
  

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
41 楼    发表于2009-07-23 01:25:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-07-23 01:25:00 编辑  Case 2

名称:图1
描述:图1

名称:图2
描述:图2
0
回复

wangjw855 离线

帖子:1618
粉蓝豆:209
经验:2515
注册时间:2009-05-16
加关注  |  发消息
42 楼    发表于2009-07-25 23:02:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用笃行者在2009-7-25 8:37:00的发言:

 经典而少见的病例!谢谢Dr. zhao!

同意楼上两位老师的意见。

第一例考虑是单纯小管型的Sertoli细胞瘤;

第二、三例拿不准,很可能也是Sertoli细胞瘤的复杂小管型,但还要和诸如颗粒细胞瘤、类癌等鉴别一下;

第四例是环状小管性索肿瘤;

第五例考虑是颗粒细胞瘤。但最好要有免疫组化的结果支持。

不知正确与否,期待zhao老师的最后讲解。

学习了,这样的病例集中学习最有意义!!支持笃行者老师的诊断。
0
回复

wfbjwt 离线

帖子:6628
粉蓝豆:163
经验:7418
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
43 楼    发表于2009-07-25 23:14:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-07-25 23:15:00 编辑

 1、支持细胞瘤;

2、颗粒细胞瘤;

3、类癌;

4、伴环状小管的性索肿瘤;

5、没感觉。

 

赵老师啥时给答案?期待

0
回复
signature
嫁人就嫁灰太狼,学习要上华夏网。

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
44 楼    发表于2009-07-26 09:18:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 For the last case, please observe the cytomorphology and architectures of the tumor more carefully. Did you notice some compacted tubular structures? Did you see granulosa tumors like this one before?

I can tell you that all these tumors are ov sex cord tumors. Just think a little more and give the reasonable guess. Frankly speaking rare people in the world have seen this growth pattern of the tumor. Now you are one of them.

0
回复

笃行者 离线

帖子:2689
粉蓝豆:59
经验:3020
注册时间:2006-10-04
加关注  |  发消息
45 楼    发表于2009-07-26 14:31:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-07-27 20:54:00 编辑  关于第五例,分化较差的颗粒细胞瘤似乎可以出现这种形态,但shandongzhang主任提到的可能wolffian起源的肿瘤也应该考虑。
0
回复
signature
博学之,审问之,慎思之,明辨之,笃行之。

强子 离线

帖子:950
粉蓝豆:535
经验:1218
注册时间:2007-10-28
加关注  |  发消息
46 楼    发表于2009-07-27 07:32:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-07-27 22:59:00 编辑  

 For the last case, please observe the cytomorphology and architectures of the tumor more carefully. Did you notice some compacted tubular structures? Did you see granulosa tumors like this one before?

I can tell you that all these tumors are ov sex cord tumors. Just think a little more and give the reasonable guess. Frankly speaking rare people in the world have seen this growth pattern of the tumor. Now you are one of them.


cqzhao老师回复:最后一例,注意仔细观察其细胞形态和肿瘤结构。看到那些比较紧密的管状结构了吗?以前看到过这样的粒层细胞瘤吗?

可以告诉大家的是,这几个病例都是卵巢的性索细胞肿瘤。仔细考虑一下,给出reasonable guess。老实说,看到具有这样的生长方式的这种肿瘤的人不多 (the fifth case)。现在你们就是其中之一……

0
回复
signature
赚点散碎银子养家,乐呵呵的穿衣吃饭

笃行者 离线

帖子:2689
粉蓝豆:59
经验:3020
注册时间:2006-10-04
加关注  |  发消息
47 楼    发表于2009-07-27 20:57:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 再次复习第五例,Sertoli细胞瘤也可以呈现这种形态。
0
回复
signature
博学之,审问之,慎思之,明辨之,笃行之。

shandongzhang 离线

帖子:804
粉蓝豆:506
经验:1510
注册时间:2006-09-24
加关注  |  发消息
48 楼    发表于2009-07-27 22:24:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

“……可以告诉大家的是,这几个病例都是卵巢的性索细胞肿瘤。……”

5个病例5种结构或图像,可以有5肿独特的相应的肿瘤,但是5个病例都是卵巢性索细胞肿瘤的话,“Sertoli细胞瘤”完全可以解释上述不同分化程度的5种组织学结构,貌似有别,其实为同一肿瘤的不同分化。

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
49 楼    发表于2009-07-28 05:30:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 城北 于 2017-02-25 10:18:06 编辑

 All of them are pure sertoli cell tumors (SCT) from AFIP files I once used them for IHC study (about 20 stains for each cases).  I reviewed 150 cases of pure SCT and used 40 cases for IHC study at AFIP.

As some of you mentioned the case 4 may be called sex cord tumor with annular tubules (SCTAT). Some people may call SCT, complex tubular pattern (Tavassoli). Basically they are the same tumors called different tumors by different authours. People though SCTAT may be related with Peutz-Jeghers syndroma (P-Z-S). In fact Dr. Young paper indicated 11% (6/54)of SCT patients had PJS.

Case 5 is SCT with spindle cell growth pattern. You will appreciate the tubular structure if you see the photos carefully. 

Dr. Young paper: Among 54 SCT, The predominant microscopic pattern was tubular, seen, albeit often only focally, in all tumors; other patterns were cords or trabeculae (28), diffuse (21), pseudopapillary (4), retiform (3), islands or alveolar arrangements (3), and spindled (3). The tubules were solid or hollow with the former being somewhat more common.

Remeber that tubular structures are present in all SCT even though they can be very focal.

The largest and best paper about morphogolgic description and clinical followup results of SCT  is Dr Young's paper.

The largest and detailed IHC studies on SCT are my two papers. I paste these three papers in the following for some ones who may be interested.

0
收起回复
  • catcat:  再次学习,感触颇深!谢谢赵老师!
    2014-04-12 17:44

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
50 楼    发表于2009-07-28 05:31:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-07-28 05:37:00 编辑

 

Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Feb;29(2):143-56.

Sertoli cell tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 54 cases.

Oliva E, Alvarez T, Young RH.

James Wright Pathology Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. eoliva@partners.org

 

Ovarian Sertoli cell tumors are rare, and their morphologic spectrum, behavior, and factors influencing the latter are not clearly established. They may be mimicked by many different tumors, some of them more frequent than Sertoli cell tumors; immunohistochemistry may aid in this differential, but its role has not been analyzed in a large series. We studied the clinicopathologic features of 54 Sertoli cell tumors, including the immunohistochemical profile of 23 of them. The patients, 6 of whom had Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, ranged from 2 to 76 years of age (mean, 30 years). Eleven patients had estrogenic and 4 had androgenic manifestations. The tumors ranged from 0.8 to 30 cm, with the majority being in the range of 4 to 12 cm. They were all unilateral, usually solid, and often yellow. The predominant microscopic pattern was tubular, seen, albeit often only focally, in all tumors; other patterns were cords or trabeculae (28), diffuse (21), pseudopapillary (4), retiform (3), islands or alveolar arrangements (3), and spindled (3). The tubules were solid or hollow with the former being somewhat more common. Delicate septa were occasionally seen and were conspicuous in areas of one tumor. The stroma was abundant in 15 tumors with marked sclerosis in 4. The cells usually had pale to occasionally densely eosinophilic cytoplasm, but 6 tumors were composed of cells with prominent foamy cytoplasm, falling in the category of "lipid-rich" Sertoli cell tumor, and one had cells with clear non-foamy cytoplasm. Forty-four tumors were stage I (42 of them were stage Ia and 2 were stage Ic), 1 was stage II, 3 were stage III, and 6 were not adequately staged. Follow-up was available for 27 patients with stage I tumors, and all were alive and well at last follow-up except for 2 patients with stage Ia and 1 with stage Ic disease. Those 3 patients had pelvic-abdominal recurrences 18, 36, and 9 months, respectively, after the initial diagnosis. Two of the three clinically malignant stage I tumors had moderate to severe cytologic atypia and brisk mitotic activity (>5 or more mitoses/10 high power fields [HPFs]), and one of these had tumor cell necrosis. Among the 10 clinically benign stage I tumors with more than 5 years of follow-up, only 3 had >5 mitoses/10 HPFs, but none had more than mild cytologic atypia and none had tumor cell necrosis. Two of the three patients with stage III disease had follow-up information and one was alive at 16 months and the second developed splenic metastases 2 years after the initial diagnosis. Two of the three stage III tumors had at least moderate cytologic atypia and brisk mitotic activity. Immunohistochemical stains showed positivity for AE1/3-Cam5.2 in 15 of 23 tumors; Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) was negative in all the tumors. Inhibin was positive in 18 of 22 tumors, calretinin in 10 of 20, CD99 in 19 of 22, vimentin in 17 of 18, smooth muscle actin in 4 of 18, neuron specific enolase in 8 of 16, S-100 in 2 of 20, and chromogranin was negative in all 21 cases studied. Although Sertoli cell tumors usually have a distinctive tubular pattern that facilitates the diagnosis, other patterns may occasionally predominate, causing confusion with various other primary and metastatic ovarian tumors. EMA, inhibin, and chromogranin represent the most helpful triad of immunomarkers serving to exclude two common mimics of Sertoli cell tumors (endometrioid carcinoma [inhibin-; EMA+; chromogranin-] and carcinoid tumor [inhibin-; EMA+; chromogranin+]). Although CD99 and calretinin are often expressed in these tumors, they are much less specific and not as helpful in the differential diagnosis. Most Sertoli cell tumors are stage I, unilateral, cytologically bland, and clinically benign, but occasional examples are high stage, and about 11% of stage I tumors have worrisome histologic features that may portend an adverse outcome. The tumors typically occur in young females, sometimes children who typically present with sexual precocity, and occasional patients have Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

 
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
51 楼    发表于2009-07-28 05:35:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 : Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Mar;33(3):354-66.

Identification of the most sensitive and robust immunohistochemical markers in different categories of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors.

Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. zhaoc@upmc.edu

Different immunohistochemical sex cord-stromal markers have been previously studied in various types of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors; however, the sensitivity for sex cord-stromal lineage may vary between markers, and some markers may not be as sensitive in some types of sex cord-stromal tumors compared with other tumors in this spectrum of neoplasms. The goals of this study were to determine which immunohistochemical markers are the most sensitive and immunohistochemically robust for sex cord-stromal lineage within a given type of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumor, and to establish whether there are substantial differences of expression of these markers between different types of sex cord-stromal tumors. Immunohistochemical stains for markers which have known variable specificity for sex cord-stromal lineage [inhibin, calretinin, MART-1/melan-A, CD99, steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1, adrenal 4-binding protein), and WT1], were performed in 127 cases of 5 different types of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors: adult granulosa cell tumor (n=32), Sertoli cell tumor (n=27), Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor (n=18), steroid cell tumor (n=25), and fibroma/fibrothecoma (n=25). All cases in each type of sex cord-stromal tumor expressed SF-1. Inhibin and calretinin were expressed in all groups of tumors but with a lesser frequency (56% to 100% and 36% to 100% of cases, respectively). All types of tumors except steroid cell tumor expressed WT1. Fibroma/fibrothecoma was the only type of tumor that did not express CD99. The only tumor groups that showed expression of MART-1 were Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor (restricted to the Leydig cell component) and steroid cell tumor (94% and 96% of cases, respectively). The type of sex cord-stromal tumor that was least frequently positive for several of the different markers studied was fibroma/fibrothecoma. Among all tumor groups combined, inhibin and WT1 were the 2 markers showing the most diffuse expression. Likewise, the single marker showing the most optimal combination of diffuse and strong staining (immunohistochemical composite score: possible range, 1 to 12) varied between tumors: adult granulosa cell tumor-inhibin (score 10.0); Sertoli cell tumor-WT1 (score 10.8); Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor (Sertoli cell component)-WT1 (score 10.4); steroid cell tumor-inhibin (score 11.2); and fibroma/fibrothecoma-WT1 (score 8.9). We conclude that most immunohistochemical sex cord-stromal markers have sufficient sensitivity for sex cord-stromal lineage. Although each of the different types of sex cord-stromal tumors has a slightly unique immunoprofile in terms of frequency and extent of expression, these differences are relatively minor for most types of tumors with certain exceptions (eg, WT1 is not diagnostically useful in steroid cell tumor; CD99 is not diagnostically useful in fibroma/fibrothecoma; the only sex cord-stromal tumor for which MART-1 is diagnostically useful is steroid cell tumor; inhibin and calretinin are less diagnostically useful in fibroma/fibrothecoma than in the other types of tumors, but expression in fibrothecoma was higher than in fibroma). SF-1 is the most sensitive sex cord-stromal marker among the most common types of sex cord-stromal tumors. Given the findings relating to sensitivity and extent of expression in this study, and known specificity in the literature, the most informative sex cord-stromal markers to be used for the distinction from nonsex cord-stromal tumors are inhibin, calretinin, SF-1, and WT1 (the exact number of markers to be used should be based on the degree of difficulty of the case and level of experience of the pathologist); however, the utility of immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of fibroma/fibrothecoma is somewhat limited.

0
回复

笃行者 离线

帖子:2689
粉蓝豆:59
经验:3020
注册时间:2006-10-04
加关注  |  发消息
52 楼    发表于2009-07-28 19:23:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 的确非常非常精彩,Sertoli细胞瘤并不很多见,一次能见到这五种少见形态的确非常幸运!

非常感谢Dr. zhao!!

0
回复
signature
博学之,审问之,慎思之,明辨之,笃行之。

迷茫 离线

帖子:659
粉蓝豆:260
经验:2172
注册时间:2007-10-29
加关注  |  发消息
53 楼    发表于2009-07-28 21:58:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

非常感谢

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
54 楼    发表于2009-07-30 02:00:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-07-30 02:13:00 编辑

 Pure ovarian sertoli cell tumors are rare. I am pasting here another 22 cases of pure sertoli cell tumors. All of these cases are AFIP consult cases since 1970 years. I choose them from my study files. Please enjoy different growth patterns of the tumors and do not question the dx. All of these cases were reviewed by at least three gyncologic pathologists and were stained for more than 20 immuno markers.

I am sure that you are the one of a few pathologists in the world who have seen so many cases of ovarian pure sertoli cell tumors.

Each photo represents one case with 100 or 200 x or 400x

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
55 楼    发表于2009-07-30 02:02:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 城北 于 2017-02-25 10:20:10 编辑  case 1-6

名称:图1
描述:图1

名称:图2
描述:图2

名称:图3
描述:图3

名称:图4
描述:图4

名称:图5
描述:图5

名称:图6
描述:图6
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
56 楼    发表于2009-07-30 02:04:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-07-30 02:06:00 编辑  case 7-12

名称:图1
描述:图1

名称:图2
描述:图2

名称:图3
描述:图3

名称:图4
描述:图4

名称:图5
描述:图5

名称:图6
描述:图6
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
57 楼    发表于2009-07-30 02:06:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-07-30 02:10:00 编辑  case 12 (repeat, sorry) -17

名称:图1
描述:图1

名称:图2
描述:图2

名称:图3
描述:图3

名称:图4
描述:图4

名称:图5
描述:图5

名称:图6
描述:图6
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
58 楼    发表于2009-07-30 02:11:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-07-30 02:13:00 编辑

 case 18-22

 


名称:图1
描述:图1

名称:图2
描述:图2

名称:图3
描述:图3

名称:图4
描述:图4

名称:图5
描述:图5
0
回复

shandongzhang 离线

帖子:804
粉蓝豆:506
经验:1510
注册时间:2006-09-24
加关注  |  发消息
59 楼    发表于2009-07-30 07:41:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 欣赏ing
0
回复

笃行者 离线

帖子:2689
粉蓝豆:59
经验:3020
注册时间:2006-10-04
加关注  |  发消息
60 楼    发表于2009-07-30 17:50:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 
非常感谢cqzhao老师能给我们这样一个机会,系统学习Sertoli细胞瘤的不同组织学形态!
非常难得!
0
回复
signature
博学之,审问之,慎思之,明辨之,笃行之。
回复:100 阅读:17428
共5页/97条首页上一页12345下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接