共1页/6条首页上一页1下一页尾页
回复:29 阅读:5195
B1839乳房高级别血管肉瘤 (cqz-21)

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2009-06-18 21:34|举报|关注(0)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复
姓    名: ××× 性别:   年龄:  
标本名称:  
简要病史:  
肉眼检查:  

about 60 y/f with no malignant history

F1 20x

F2-3 200x

F4-5 400x

  • 乳房高级别血管肉瘤 (cqz-21)图1
    图1
  • 乳房高级别血管肉瘤 (cqz-21)图2
    图2
  • 乳房高级别血管肉瘤 (cqz-21)图3
    图3
  • 乳房高级别血管肉瘤 (cqz-21)图4
    图4
  • 乳房高级别血管肉瘤 (cqz-21)图5
    图5
标签:乳腺高级别血管肉瘤
本帖最后由 于 2009-07-23 05:25:00 编辑
0
添加参考诊断
×参考诊断
  

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
1 楼    发表于2009-11-24 06:02:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用dytok在2009-11-22 21:46:00的发言:

 血管肉瘤----乳腺发生和软组织发生的异同点?????

Good question.

Welcome some one can make a summary.

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
2 楼    发表于2009-07-10 19:34:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 Thank abin to send the table above.

We can find a lot of tables from different expert text book. In practice low grade tumor needs to differ from benign or atypical hemagioma. Low grade tumor is easy to distinguish from intermediate or high grade tumor. However it is difficult to tell the difference between the intermediate grade tumor and high grade tumor for some cases. Fortunately it is not clinical important to distinguish intermediate grade tumor from high grade tumor.

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
3 楼    发表于2009-07-08 10:00:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 Thank Dr. Zhang, thank you for your input.

Dr. Rosen's paper indicated that ki67 may be useful in distinguish low grade angiosarcoma from benign hemagioma. Last week I asked the question to Dr. Christopher Fletcher, Professor and Director of Surgical Pathology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard medical School. He answered that We do not use Ki-67 in this context.

Anyway ki67 stain is not useful for dx of high grade or intermediate grade angiosarcoma.


0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
4 楼    发表于2009-07-07 12:58:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2009-07-07 09:53:00 编辑  High grade angiosarcoma. See the discussion in cqz-case 22. I do not think pathologists need to separate angiosarcomas arising from breast skin or from breast parenchyma. Generally in postradiation angiosarcomas, cutaneous presentation are more common.
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
5 楼    发表于2009-07-07 09:59:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 Just noted that Dr. zhang mentioned above Ki67 for differentiation cutanuous angiosarcoma from paranchymal angiosarcoma. Could you show the reference? Thanks, cz
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
6 楼    发表于2009-06-19 10:53:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 Think the tumor type?

Benign or malignant?

If you think malignant, you need to have grade, low intermediate, high grade.

How do you grade?

Evaluate cytologic atypia, mitoses, solid and spindle cell areas, necrosis, et al.

Then have your complete dx.

0
回复
回复:29 阅读:5195
共1页/6条首页上一页1下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接