图片: | |
---|---|
名称: | |
描述: | |
以下是引用天山望月在2008-10-3 11:58:00的发言: 宫内膜厚,清出内膜多少?有无用药史?月经周期怎样?像图1的腺体病变范围有多大?有无其它方面的病变?低倍图有点少,不易诊断。如果仅见图1 那么小范围的病变,我感觉可以报小区复杂性增生。 |
朱正龙
stevenshen 离线
There are some glandular complexity with no significant cytologic atypia. I would not be confident to make a diagnosis of complex hyperplasia in a premenopausal woman. Consider physiologic process or endometrial polyp etc. Will need to review all material and make a meaningul interpretation. Thanks.
Agree c above. Generally it is difficult to make dx of em-bx by few online photos. I feel it is a benign process in low power. However last fig in high power looks different. The cells are nuiform and have low grade nuclei, but the glands have complex architectures and show no stroma between the glands. In the dx of em lesions gland structures are more important than nuclear atypia. Endometrial ca can have grade 1 nuclei.
I feel afraid to jump in any final dx based on the photos above if it were my true clinical case.
Hard to say. I didn't get a feeling about this endometrial biopsy: too few fields to evaluate. Photo 1 and 2 may represent complex hyperplasia if everywhere is like this. Last photo has several atypical nuclei and looks like microacinar proliferation which is associated with higher risk of endometrial carcinoma concurrently or subsequently. I don't see mitoses, not even sure this is proliferative endometrium or secretory endometrium. Endomtrial hyperplasia or neoplasia should show proliferative glands.
Is this endometrial biopsy? Sometimes with EM biopsy, i don't feel confident to call it atypical hyperplasia but worry about it. Under such circumstances, i would suggest endometrial curettage which yields more tissue and represents the EM pathology better than biopsy.
Dr. wy1992:
This is an interesting case, first, the endometrium looks like complex hyperplasia with cellular atypia, but patient is only in her early 40' pregnancy is possible. some reactive changes in normal pregnenay may show those endometrial changes. you need to be very careful to rule out pregnency first and then give the dx. Clinical information is vital important.
second, your photos didnot show the junctions between glands and stroma, so microinvasive endo-Ca cannot be excluded.
Hope this may help you dx, have a nice holiday.