我更倾向于 腺瘤伴肌层假浸润

 A few points in determing the diagnosis of this case:

I am sure this is at least adenocarcinoma in-situ.  I saw neoplastic glands acrossing smooth muscle bundles.  If you are sure those are muscularis mucosae and the neoplastic glands have invaded through muscularis mucosae into submucosa, then the diagnosis is well differentiated invasive adenocarcinoma.  Then you decide the depth of invasion (to superficial or deep muscularis propria? to serosa?).  The muscle bundles shown here are thin, and i doudt these are muscularis propria.

If you are not sure the neoplastic glands have invaded though muscularis mucosae, then the diagnosis is intramucosal adenocarcinoma which means that the tumor has invaded to the lamina propria but not to submucosa..

I am not sure about the value of the intraoperative touch prep.  In colon precancerous lesions and cancer, sometimes the cytology does not decide the lesion is invasive or not and depth of invasion.  It is the location of the glands that determines the final diagnosis.  Maybe something i have not learned, please let me know.

One picture shows periglandular cleft, be very careful to call that lymphovascular invasion.  Sometimes it is artifact.