共3页/42条首页上一页123下一页尾页
回复:42 阅读:12934
盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物

Renghis 离线

帖子:2530
粉蓝豆:102
经验:4081
注册时间:2007-12-13
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2012-02-15 21:34|举报|关注(6)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复

  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图1
    图1
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图2
    图2
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图3
    图3
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图4
    图4
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图5
    图5
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图6
    图6
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图7
    图7
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图8
    图8
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图9
    图9
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图10
    图10
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图11
    图11
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图12
    图12
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图13
    图13
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图14
    图14
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图15
    图15
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图16
    图16
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图17
    图17
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图18
    图18
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图19
    图19
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图20
    图20
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图21
    图21
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图22
    图22
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图23
    图23
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图24
    图24
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图25
    图25
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图26
    图26
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图27
    图27
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图28
    图28
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图29
    图29
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图30
    图30
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图31
    图31
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图32
    图32
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图33
    图33
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图34
    图34
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图35
    图35
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图36
    图36
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图37
    图37
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图38
    图38
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图39
    图39
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图40
    图40
  • 盆腹腔巨大囊实性肿物图41
    图41

 

标签:
3
signature
重归学生时代!
×参考诊断
(盆腔腹腔肿物)混合性子宫内膜间质-平滑肌肿瘤(低级别,低度恶性)。

abin 离线

帖子:7416
粉蓝豆:6014
经验:11787
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
42 楼    发表于2012-03-23 22:40:21举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 abin 于 2012-03-23 22:45:52 编辑

值得学习。反省:双相性肿瘤也可能是上皮样平滑肌肿瘤。我的鉴别诊断库又丰富了,哈哈。

谢谢楼主。

另外建议楼主改进免疫组化质控,要有对照。据说,陈国璋教授亲自负责他们的免疫组化质控。

再啰嗦几句:从会诊所开的免疫组化项目分析的鉴别诊断思路包括:肌源性分化、子宫内膜间质分化、性索分化、SFT、上皮性分化、神经内分泌分化、GIST,考虑的都是常见病,都是常规思路。

3

Renghis

dragon

ChenJo..
回复
signature

华夏病理/粉蓝医疗

为基层医院病理科提供全面解决方案,

努力让人人享有便捷准确可靠的病理诊断服务。


xhyong 离线

帖子:1060
粉蓝豆:519
经验:1993
注册时间:2006-10-19
加关注  |  发消息
41 楼    发表于2012-03-18 21:12:23举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

谢谢了,感谢楼主,有始有终

0
回复

zhanglei 离线

帖子:3751
粉蓝豆:2078
经验:3901
注册时间:2006-09-26
加关注  |  发消息
40 楼    发表于2012-03-18 21:04:22举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

这例给我们2个启示:1、病理诊断还是要结合部位从常见病、多发病开始考虑,要从典型中找不典型,从不典型中找典型。2、免疫组化应该为HE形态服务,当出现矛盾时,以HE形态为准。

1

Renghis
回复

dragon 离线

帖子:207
粉蓝豆:5
经验:268
注册时间:2011-02-17
加关注  |  发消息
39 楼    发表于2012-03-18 19:47:01举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

感谢版主告知最后诊断,从中学习了很多!

1

hadi
回复
signature
将生命本质里最真实的想法付诸实践的勇气

emilypeaker 离线

帖子:654
粉蓝豆:1570
经验:2182
注册时间:2011-01-03
加关注  |  发消息
38 楼    发表于2012-03-18 12:45:04举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

有始有终,不错。

0
回复
signature
Suffered from papillary thyroid carcinoma, then major in Endocrine tumor.

Renghis 离线

帖子:2530
粉蓝豆:102
经验:4081
注册时间:2007-12-13
加关注  |  发消息
37 楼    发表于2012-03-18 09:42:59举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 Renghis 于 2012-03-18 09:52:05 编辑

 

中山大学附属肿瘤医院 会诊结果:

混合性子宫内膜间质-平滑肌肿瘤(低级别,低度恶性)

 

本例纯粹被免疫组化坑了!

我院免疫组化SMA和CD10完全阴性,可在会诊医院却显示阳性,会诊医院加做HHF35也是阳性(SMA、CD10及HHF35阳性范围及强度不清楚)。由此认为,HE形态学还是放在第一位,当HE形态强烈怀疑某个肿瘤,而关键免疫组化不支持时,这时就要好好思索是不是免疫组化的问题了,可以加做对照或使用外院抗体。

 

 


名称:图1
描述:P1020687

 

0
回复
signature
重归学生时代!

hyl76 离线

帖子:781
粉蓝豆:656
经验:3771
注册时间:2007-06-05
加关注  |  发消息
36 楼    发表于2012-03-05 08:39:49举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

很好的病例!学习中

0
回复
signature
学无止境,不进则退!

Renghis 离线

帖子:2530
粉蓝豆:102
经验:4081
注册时间:2007-12-13
加关注  |  发消息
35 楼    发表于2012-03-05 07:54:03举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
引用 31 楼 pathologybz 在 2012-03-04 14:28:32 的发言:

楼主所说的阴性标记是丁点也不表达吗?那可难了!


一丁点儿也不表达!影像学及术中所见卵巢一丁点儿事都没有!肿物与卵巢没有关系!一有会诊结果,立即告知大家!

0
回复
signature
重归学生时代!

风吹过 离线

帖子:88
粉蓝豆:28
经验:163
注册时间:2010-11-03
加关注  |  发消息
34 楼    发表于2012-03-04 22:19:42举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

期待会诊结果!

0
回复
signature
好好学习

pathologybz 离线

帖子:14
粉蓝豆:2
经验:20
注册时间:2012-02-28
加关注  |  发消息
33 楼    发表于2012-03-04 15:13:13举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

本例从大体形态、组织学和免疫表型看,首先还是应该考虑卵巢纤维瘤、卵泡膜纤维瘤或富于细胞性纤维瘤,具体哪个要看组织切片决定。

理由如下:

1、大体上囊实性,这是卵巢纤维瘤或卵泡膜纤维瘤常见的表现。

2、组织学由一致的梭形细胞构成,间质有水肿、粘液样变,略呈结节状改变。据楼主的观察核分裂少见。

3、免疫组化表达desmin、CD56、Vimentin、CD99,这些与假设诊断并不矛盾。

Mod Pathol. 1998 Jul;11(7):656-64.

Inhibin expression in ovarian tumors and tumor-like lesions: an immunohistochemical study.

Source

Department of Pathology, University of Mainz, Germany.

Abstract

We investigated 203 ovarian tumors and tumor-like lesions for inhibin expression using a monoclonal anti-inhibin alpha antibody. Inhibin was present in the tumor cells in all 14 primary adult granulosa cell tumors (4 luteinized) plus 3 metastatic, all 10 primary juvenile granulosa cell tumors plus 1 metastatic, 10 of 11 thecomas, 3 of 11 fibromas, 4 of 11 sclerosing stromal tumors, 6 of 11 Sertoli cell tumors (1 oxyphilic), 7 of 11 Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors, 1 gynandroblastoma, 10 primary ovarian sex cord tumors with annular tubules plus 2 metastatic, 8 of 9 steroid cell tumors, both pregnancy luteomas, 1 of 2 unclassified sex cord tumors, 2 of 5 gonadoblastomas, 9 of 10 female adnexal tumors of probable wolffian origin, and in the non-neoplastic stroma of many carcinomas and germ cell tumors. The tumor cells were inhibin-negative in 10 fibrosarcomas, 12 small cell carcinomas of hypercalcemic type, 24 germ cell tumors (except for a focus of inhibin-positive syncytiotrophoblast in one case), and 17 ovarian carcinomas. Two of the three inhibin-positive fibromas showed diffuse immunostaining and were associated with evidence of estrogenic activity. Among nine Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors with available clinical data, four that were more than minimally inhibin-positive were accompanied by androgenic manifestations; five inhibin-negative or only minimally positive tumors lacked such evidence. Inhibin immunostaining may be useful in the differential diagnosis of inhibin-positive sex cord tumors versus histologically similar inhibin-negative neoplasms, but inhibin negativity does not preclude a diagnosis of sex cord tumor. The unexpected, common inhibin positivity of female adnexal tumors of probable wolffian origin indicates that inhibin staining cannot be used to differentiate these tumors from Sertoli cell tumors. Inhibin immunostaining is also helpful in identifying potential steroid hormone-secreting cells in the non-neoplastic stromal component of epithelial, germ cell, and other ovarian tumors.

 

Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Jun;32(6):884-90.

Expression of CD56 and WT1 in ovarian stroma and ovarian stromal tumors.

Source

Division of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Abstract

The immunophenotype of ovarian stroma and spindle cell tumors derived from ovarian stroma has not been well studied. We studied the expression of CD56, WT1, estrogen receptor-beta (ER-beta), progesterone receptor (PR), smooth muscle actin, S-100, CD34, and muscle specific actin in 16 normal ovaries, 17 ovarian fibromas, 11 ovarian cellular fibromas, 10 ovarian fibrothecomas, and 11 ovarian leiomyomas. In addition, we studied CD56 and WT1 expression in 7 cases of normal endometrium, 8 uterine smooth muscle tumors, 5 endometrial stromal tumors and 64 nongynecologic (GYN) spindle cell sarcomas. All normal ovaries, ovarian fibromas, fibrothecomas, and ovarian leiomyomas were positive for CD56 and WT1. Most of the normal ovaries, ovarian fibromas, ovarian fibrothecomas, and ovarian leiomyomata also expressed ER-beta and PR. Eight of 17 ovarian fibromas, 5 of 11 ovarian cellular fibromas, and 4 of 10 ovarian fibrothecoma with focal fibroblastic differentiation were positive for smooth muscle actin. A few cases of these tumors also expressed S-100 and CD34. Only rare cases of non-GYN spindle cell sarcomas expressed WT1. Our study results show that ovarian fibromas, fibrothecomas, and leiomyomas have a similar immunophenotype (positive for CD56, WT1, ER-beta, and PR) to that of ovarian stromal cells, supporting an ovarian stromal origin for these neoplasms. However, unlike normal ovarian stromal cells, ovarian fibromas, fibrothecomas, and leiomyomas can also show fibroblastic, smooth muscle, Schwannian, and solitary fibrous tumorlike differentiation. WT1 is a fairly specific marker for spindle cell tumors of gynecologic organs, including ovarian spindle cell tumors, endometrial stromal tumors, and uterine smooth muscle tumors. Non-GYN spindle cell sarcomas rarely express WT1. CD56 is strongly expressed in ovarian stromal cells but not in endometrial stromal cells. CD56 is often expressed by a wide variety of spindle cell sarcomas, thus, it has no value in differentiating GYN from non-GYN spindle cell tumors.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990 May;114(5):502-5.

Immunohistochemical analysis for desmin in normal and neoplastic ovarian stromal tissue.

Source

Department of Pathology, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY 10032.

Abstract

Ovarian stroma contains cells with the ultrastructural features of smooth-muscle cells. The purpose of this study was to analyze normal ovaries, ovarian stromal tumors (fibroma/thecomata and granulosa cell tumors), and ovarian leiomyomata for desmin reactivity. Groups of ovarian stromal cells that expressed desmin were noted in six of six normal ovaries. Desmin was also detected in two of six fibroma/thecomata and two of two ovarian leiomyomata. The number of tumor cells with detectable desmin was much greater in the leiomyomata. Desmin was not detected in any of six granulosa cell tumors. We conclude that stromal cells with an immunohistochemical feature of smooth-muscle cells are routinely found in normal ovaries. This study demonstrates the usefulness of immunohistochemistry in corroborating the diagnosis of ovarian leiomyomata, although desmin positivity per se is not diagnostic of ovarian leiomyomata, and also raises the possibility that some ovarian leiomyomata may be derived from stromal cells.

 

0
回复

pathologybz 离线

帖子:14
粉蓝豆:2
经验:20
注册时间:2012-02-28
加关注  |  发消息
32 楼    发表于2012-03-04 14:46:58举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 pathologybz 于 2012-03-04 14:47:27 编辑

还有个问题,本例中右侧卵巢有事吗?从手术描述看右侧卵巢好像没有事情啊。

0
回复

pathologybz 离线

帖子:14
粉蓝豆:2
经验:20
注册时间:2012-02-28
加关注  |  发消息
31 楼    发表于2012-03-04 14:28:32举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

楼主所说的阴性标记是丁点也不表达吗?那可难了!

0
回复

Renghis 离线

帖子:2530
粉蓝豆:102
经验:4081
注册时间:2007-12-13
加关注  |  发消息
30 楼    发表于2012-03-04 12:41:57举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
引用 27 楼 xhyong 在 2012-03-03 20:29:47 的发言:

会诊结果?

 

会诊结果尚未回来,一有会诊结果,立即告知大家!!!必须的!!!

0
回复
signature
重归学生时代!

羽珩 离线

帖子:797
粉蓝豆:25
经验:1208
注册时间:2010-11-24
加关注  |  发消息
29 楼    发表于2012-03-04 12:19:44举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

本例我感觉在于SFT和上皮样平滑肌(血管来源)瘤鉴别,但是SFT不会出现肌源性免疫组化的阳性表达,所以结合免疫组化,考虑为上皮样平滑肌瘤(血管平滑肌来源),因为仔细寻找,肿瘤细胞和血管平滑肌瘤细胞是有一定过度的。

0
回复
signature

炎相羽珹

dragon 离线

帖子:207
粉蓝豆:5
经验:268
注册时间:2011-02-17
加关注  |  发消息
28 楼    发表于2012-03-04 12:12:19举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

版主,会诊结果出来了吗?

0
回复
signature
将生命本质里最真实的想法付诸实践的勇气

xhyong 离线

帖子:1060
粉蓝豆:519
经验:1993
注册时间:2006-10-19
加关注  |  发消息
27 楼    发表于2012-03-03 20:29:47举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

会诊结果?

0
回复

Renghis 离线

帖子:2530
粉蓝豆:102
经验:4081
注册时间:2007-12-13
加关注  |  发消息
26 楼    发表于2012-02-24 19:28:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 

该例患者家属已经拿出去会诊,一有会诊结果即告知大家!

0
回复
signature
重归学生时代!

hadi 离线

帖子:106
粉蓝豆:136
经验:313
注册时间:2006-10-19
加关注  |  发消息
25 楼    发表于2012-02-24 11:14:24举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

SFT?平滑肌来源?

0
回复
signature
hadi

ChenJoan 离线

帖子:288
粉蓝豆:114
经验:466
注册时间:2009-10-02
加关注  |  发消息
24 楼    发表于2012-02-22 22:38:24举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

加做DOG1免疫组化。E-GIST 仍不能完全排除

0
回复
signature
Chenjoan

Renghis 离线

帖子:2530
粉蓝豆:102
经验:4081
注册时间:2007-12-13
加关注  |  发消息
23 楼    发表于2012-02-22 11:53:22举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
引用 22 楼 何生 在 2012-02-22 10:34:33 的发言:

建议再多取材,是否可找到多一些成分。

之后在不同切面补取了6块,镜下图像都很相似。

0
回复
signature
重归学生时代!
回复:42 阅读:12934
共3页/42条首页上一页123下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接