共1页/1条首页上一页1下一页尾页
回复:1 阅读:1265
病例学习(Number 5)

水若寒 离线

帖子:1019
粉蓝豆:971
经验:1383
注册时间:2009-09-23
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2011-03-18 17:10|举报|关注(0)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复
姓    名: ××× 性别:   年龄:  
标本名称:  
简要病史:  
肉眼检查:  

 

刺激中来认识新的抗体,是否值得在肾肿瘤中研究?
Immunohistochemical expression of tumor antigens MAGE-A3/4 and NY-ESO-1 in renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma
Pathology – Research and Practice 206 (2010) 695–699
The distinction between renal oncocytoma (RO) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC), especially
the eosinophilic variant, can often be difficult. Our study has documented for the first time the
expression of MAGE-A3/4 and NY-ESO-1 cancer testis antigens (CTAs) in these tumors. A total of 35
patients (17 ROs and 18 ChRCCs) were included in the study. Two antibodies were used for immunohistochemical
staining: 57B recognizing multiple MAGE-A and D8.38 recognizing NY-ESO-1 CTAs. Fifteen
(88.2%) samples of RO stained positively for both MAGE-A3/4 and NY-ESO-1 antigens. Regarding ChRCC,
seven (38.9%) stained positively for MAGE-A3/4 and six (33.3%) for NY-ESO-1 antigens. Median MAGEA3/
4 expression was moderately positive in RO and negative in ChRCC. The difference in MAGE-A3/4
expression between two tumor groups was significant (P = 0.0013). Median NY-ESO-1 expression was
strongly positive in RO and negative in ChRCC. The difference in NY-ESO-1 expression between two
tumor groups was also significant (P = 0.0008). Our study has shown that RO had a significantly higher
expression of both CTAs. However, additional research is needed to clarify their potential diagnostic
implications.

  • 病例学习(Number 5)图1
    图1
  • 病例学习(Number 5)图2
    图2
标签:
0
添加参考诊断
×参考诊断
  

曹大夫 离线

帖子:331
粉蓝豆:510
经验:429
注册时间:2006-09-28
加关注  |  发消息
1 楼    发表于2011-03-18 18:43:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
很多肿瘤都表达这些蛋白,意义不是特别大。

如果为了发点文章,当然可以做。
0
回复
回复:1 阅读:1265
共1页/1条首页上一页1下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接