共4页/65条首页上一页1234下一页尾页
回复:65 阅读:20711
宫颈活检,协助诊断(免疫组化公布)

xclbljys 离线

帖子:5253
粉蓝豆:224
经验:7005
注册时间:2008-11-21
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2010-10-27 17:04|举报|关注(1)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复
姓    名: ××× 性别:  女 年龄:  23
标本名称:  宫颈
简要病史:  妇科检查宫颈糜烂,活检
肉眼检查:  绿豆大碎组织

 

注意:患者23岁!

  • 宫颈活检,协助诊断(免疫组化公布)图1
    图1
  • 宫颈活检,协助诊断(免疫组化公布)图2
    图2
  • 宫颈活检,协助诊断(免疫组化公布)图3
    图3
  • 宫颈活检,协助诊断(免疫组化公布)图4
    图4
  • 宫颈活检,协助诊断(免疫组化公布)图5
    图5
  • 宫颈活检,协助诊断(免疫组化公布)图6
    图6
  • 宫颈活检,协助诊断(免疫组化公布)图7
    图7
  • 宫颈活检,协助诊断(免疫组化公布)图8
    图8
  • 宫颈活检,协助诊断(免疫组化公布)图9
    图9
  • 宫颈活检,协助诊断(免疫组化公布)图10
    图10
标签:
本帖最后由 于 2010-10-27 23:00:00 编辑
0
signature
许春雷
添加参考诊断
×参考诊断
  

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
41 楼    发表于2010-10-31 20:07:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;114(4):727-35.

Pregnancy outcome after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Shanbhag S, Clark H, Timmaraju V, Bhattacharya S, Cruickshank M.

University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, United Kingdom. s.shanbhag@nhs.net

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the rate of spontaneous preterm delivery and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM) in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis was performed on routinely collected Scottish national data. The exposed cohort comprised all women with CIN3; the unexposed cohort were women with no record of CIN. Further comparisons were made within the exposed cohort based on the type of treatment they had for CIN3. The primary outcomes were spontaneous preterm delivery and preterm PROM in their first pregnancies.

RESULTS: Women with CIN3 were significantly more likely to have spontaneous preterm deliveries (11% compared with 6%, odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-1.80, P<.001) and preterm PROM (8% compared with 6%, OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.09-1.48, P=.001) as compared with the unexposed population. These differences were not seen between the different treatment groups within the exposed cohort.

CONCLUSION: Women with CIN3 have higher rates of spontaneous preterm delivery and preterm PROM than do those in the general population. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure did not alter these pregnancy complication rates. Women should be counseled adequately before treatment but should be reassured regarding the treatment of CIN on the risk of preterm delivery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
42 楼    发表于2010-10-31 20:09:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 

Pregnancy outcome after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.

Michelin MA, Merino LM, Franco CA, Murta EF.

Research Institute of Oncology (IPON), Discipline of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of LEEP and cold-knife conization on the outcome of subsequent pregnancy in a tertiary public hospital.

METHODS: One hundred and ninety-nine patients met the inclusion criteria (age between 18 and 45 years old). Cold-knife conization, LEEP, and both (conization and LEEP) were performed in 102 (51.3%), 95 (47.7%) and two (1%) women, respectively. Average ages were respectively, 33 +/- 7.3; 25 +/- 6.73 and 30 +/- 2.8.

RESULTS: Pregnancies occurred 2.6 and 4.8 years after LEEP and conization, respectively. Miscarriages and preterm pregnancies were more frequent in conization cases versus LEEP, 26% and 5.2%, 23% and 5.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: If patients express a desire for pregnancy, LEEP should be the procedure of choice.

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
43 楼    发表于2010-10-31 20:11:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(4):423-8.

Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study.

Sjøborg KD, Vistad I, Myhr SS, Svenningsen R, Herzog C, Kloster-Jensen A, Nygård G, Hole S, Tanbo T.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oestfold Hospital Trust, Fredrikstad, Norway. xatsjo@so-hf.no

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of cervical laser conisation (CLC) or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) on the outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Methods. Multi-centre, retrospective, case-control study, which included a cohort of 742 women, who, after treatment with LEEP or CLC, gave birth or suffered second trimester miscarriage. Control women (n=742) were extracted from the respective hospital birth registries and matched by age and parity. Outcome measures were perinatal mortality, length of gestation, birth weight and preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM).

RESULTS: There was no significant difference in perinatal mortality among women treated with LCL or LEEP compared to controls, 6/742 versus 2/742: odds ratio (OR)=3.1 (95% CI: 0.6-15.2). Excluding second trimester miscarriages, ORs for giving birth before week 37, 32 and 28 after conisation compared to the controls were 3.4 (95% CI: 2.3-5.1), 4.6 (95% CI: 1.7-12.5), and 12.4 (95% CI: 1.6-96.1), respectively, after adjusting for smoking habits during pregnancy, marital status and educational level. Adjusted ORs of birth weight <2,500, <1,500 and <1,000 g after conisation compared to controls were 3.9 (95% CI: 2.4-6.3), 4.4 (95% CI: 1.5-13.6), and 10.4 (95% CI: 1.3-82.2), respectively. The adjusted OR for pPROM was 10.5 (95% CI: 3.7-29.5).

CONCLUSION: Treatment by CLC and LEEP increases the risk of preterm delivery, low birth weight and pPROM in subsequent pregnancies.

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
44 楼    发表于2010-10-31 20:14:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 

THis is summary for 27 studies

Lancet. 2006 Feb 11;367(9509):489-98.

Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Central Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK. mkyrgiou@yahoo.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conservative methods to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive cervical cancer are commonly used in young women because of the advent of effective screening programmes. In a meta-analysis, we investigated the effect of these procedures on subsequent fertility and pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS: We searched for studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE and classified them by the conservative method used and the outcome measure studied regarding both fertility and pregnancy. Pooled relative risks and 95% CIs were calculated with a random-effects model and interstudy heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane's Q test.

FINDINGS: We identified 27 studies. Cold knife conisation was significantly associated with preterm delivery (<37 weeks; relative risk 2.59, 95% CI 1.80-3.72, 100/704 [14%] vs 1494/27 674 [5%]), low birthweight (<2500 g; 2.53, 1.19-5.36, 32/261 [12%] vs 905/13 229 [7%]), and caesarean section (3.17, 1.07-9.40, 31/350 [9%] vs 22/670 [3%]). Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) was also significantly associated with preterm delivery (1.70, 1.24-2.35, 156/1402 [11%] vs 120/1739 [7%]), low birthweight (1.82, 1.09-3.06, 77/996 [8%] vs 49/1192 [4%]), and premature rupture of the membranes (2.69, 1.62-4.46, 48/905 [5%] vs 22/1038 [2%]). Similar but marginally non-significant adverse effects were recorded for laser conisation (preterm delivery 1.71, 0.93-3.14). We did not detect significantly increased risks for obstetric outcomes after laser ablation. Although severe outcomes such as admission to a neonatal intensive care unit or perinatal mortality showed adverse trends, these changes were not significant.

INTERPRETATION: All the excisional procedures to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia present similar pregnancy-related morbidity without apparent neonatal morbidity. Caution in the treatment of young women with mild cervical abnormalities should be recommended. Clinicians now have the evidence base to counsel women appropriately.

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
45 楼    发表于2010-10-31 20:16:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2010-10-31 20:50:00 编辑

 Generally speaking, LEEP一般不影响生育功能. May have some 影响for abortion, preterm when the procedure was perfomed on pregnant women. It will also depend on the experience of gynecologists. Colposcopy for pregnant women should be performed by experienced gynecologists

Cone/LEEP这个病人的一生就毁了!有点过了。

Anyway, very appreciate Dr. Xu's 严谨的工作态度,值得我们大家学习

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
46 楼    发表于2010-10-31 20:48:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 High grade cervical squamous lesions are not uncommon in women 20 or young. In our hospital there were 474 women aged 20 or younger had HSIL Pap for 6 years with youngest one of 13 year.
0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
47 楼    发表于2010-10-31 20:51:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 

This is my study result

Histological Follow-up Findings in Adolescents with HSIL Cytology Results
  Arch Path Lab Med in print. 

Chengquan Zhao, MD Pal Kalposi-Novak, MD, R. Mashall Austin, MD, Dr.
Magee Womens Hospital, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Abstract:
Introduction:
The incidence of cervical intraepithelial lesions is increased in adolescents and reflects the high prevalence of hrHPV infection in this special population. Recent follow-up guidelines emphasize conservative follow-up options. Furthermore, data from cohort studies suggest that regression of both low grade and high grade CIN are quite frequent in very young women. In this study we analyzed histological follow-up data for adolescent women who had HSIL cytology reports. We also assessed the effect of presence or absence of an adequate TZ/ECS in liquid-based Pap tests on the follow-up biopsy diagnoses.
Materials and methods:
The computerized records of a large academic women’s hospital were searched for cases reported as HSIL on TPPT in women age 20 or younger over a 6 year span between January 2002 and December, 2007. Histologic and Pap follow-up results, variations among age groups of adolescent women, and impact of presence or absence of TZ/ECS in Pap test were analyzed. Chi-Square test analysis was performed using SAS 9.1 System.
Results:
During the study period a total of 474 women age 20 or younger had HSIL Pap test results. 335 adolescent women with at least one cervical biopsy with or without endocervical curettage were included in the analysis. The average age was 18.6 years (13-20 years). The average follow-up period was 24 months (0 to 75 months) with a median of 22 months. The overall histologic CIN2/3 and detection rate was 44.2% and 47.8% for CIN1. The average period between the HSIL Pap test and an initial diagnosis of CIN2/3 was 5 months (0-62 months) with a median 2 months. The rates for histologic documentation of CIN in women age 19-20 compared to younger women were not statistically different. Detailed histologic findings are shown in Table 1. No invasive carcinomas or adenocarcinoma in situ cases were identified in this series of adolescents. The percentage of CIN 2/3 diagnosed on histologic follow up was not statistically significantly different when comparing women with and without a TZ/ECS in their preceding HSIL Pap tests (44.5% vs. 38.9%, p=0.642).
Conclusion:
Less than half of adolescent patients with HSIL cytology results had documented histologic CIN2/3 over an average follow-up period of 24 months, and no cases of invasive carcinoma were identified. CIN1 histologic follow-up findings were as common as CIN2/3 findings, likely reflecting both the increased likelihood of HSIL regression in younger women as well as the challenges of precise cytologic and histologic classification. High rates of hrHPV infection, only moderate rates of histologic CIN2/3 following HSIL cytology, and absence of invasive carcinoma all mark the adolescent group as a unique subset of patients deserving further study. Identification of additional biomarkers for HSIL progression would be useful.
   

Histologic Follow-up Finding in Adolescent Women with HSIL Cytology

Age (y)

F/U No

Negative (%)

CIN 1 (%)

CIN 2/3 (%)

19-20

199

13 (6.5)

94 (47.2)

92 (46.2)

<19

136

14 (10.3)

66 (48.5)

56 (41.2)

Total

335

27 (8.1)

160 (47.8)

148 (44.2)

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
48 楼    发表于2010-10-31 21:05:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 I feel difficult to give my impression for this case.

Stain results for P16 and Ki67 is consistent with dx of high grade dysplasia, but the cytomorphologic features on H&E are not like classic high grade dysplasia. I favor a dx of CIN2 based on IHC and H&E. However I need to review the true glass for diagnosis.

If luo zhu is not sure, can send out for consultation.

Other suggestions:

1. Dx of CIN1-2 is a bad call. Pathologists should avoid to use the diagnostic term.  If patients have both cin1 and cin2, it is fine that you call:

-CIN2.

-CIN1. (of cause it is fine you do not report cin1 if you report cin2 or cin3 already.

Or focal cin2 in the background of CIN1 if cin2 is focal.

If is ok you report CIN2-3 together.

2. For CIN lesion, HPV testing is not used for diagnosis

0
回复

xclbljys 离线

帖子:5253
粉蓝豆:224
经验:7005
注册时间:2008-11-21
加关注  |  发消息
49 楼    发表于2010-10-31 22:25:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 

感谢赵老师的关注和指导!刚学习了孟刚老师的《病理诊断风险防范》,对误诊导致的器官损害赔偿心有余悸,特别对低龄患者的恶性诊断,慎之又慎!当然,孤陋寡闻,水平欠缺是主要原因!

经各位老师指点,获益匪浅,相信以后碰到相似病例,处理方法一定好于现状!

此例病人目前没有做宫颈锥切手术,我正密切随访,希望1-2个月后能见到患者的新的病情图片!

0
回复
signature
许春雷

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
50 楼    发表于2010-10-31 22:58:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 感谢Dr.xclbljys。有随访复检真是一件好事情。

谢谢赵老师!

0
回复
signature
王军臣

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
51 楼    发表于2010-10-31 23:09:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 这里有一篇关于P16与宫颈病变的文献。

Pathology. 2008 Jun;40(4):335-44.

Diagnostic utility of p16INK4a: a reappraisal of its use in cervical biopsies.

Mulvany NJ, Allen DG, Wilson SM.

Department of Anatomical Pathology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia. nicholas.mulvany@austin.org.au

Abstract

p16(INK4a), an indirect marker of cell cycle dysregulation, is commonly expressed in cervical dysplasias and carcinomas associated with high risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infections. Although p16(INK4a) immunohistology is routinely used as a cost effective surrogate marker, many of the published articles are confusing and contradictory. The discrepancies can be ascribed to a multitude of factors operating at the molecular, technical and interpretative levels. In the first place, our simplistic model of viral mediated oncogenesis is speculative and fails to account for all the known biomolecular changes. Unresolved technical issues include the variables of tissue fixation, antibody dilution, antibody isotype and clone, and the sensitivity of the particular detection method. Within any controlled staining method, strong diffuse or 'block' immunoreactivity in squamous cells may be found in moderate/severe dysplasia (CIN 2/3) and invasive squamous carcinoma. In contrast, focal or multifocal reactivity in squamous cells may be artefactual, related to low risk or HR-HPV. p16(INK4a) is less reliable when dealing with glandular lesions since considerable overlap exists between reactive and dysplastic lesions. In addition not all glandular dysplasias/carcinomas are HR-HPV related, nor are all p16(INK4a) immunoreactive lesions associated with HR-HPV. We conclude that p16(INK4a) immunoperoxidase shows greater specificity than sensitivity for squamous lesions; in comparison, glandular dysplasias/carcinomas show reduced specificity and sensitivity. Like all cell cycle regulatory proteins, the future diagnostic role of p16(INK4a) is limited. The ideal diagnostic molecular test for cervical dysplasias will detect a HR-HPV related product after, but not before, cell transformation and will reliably predict those cases yet to experience disease progression.


0
回复
signature
王军臣

xclbljys 离线

帖子:5253
粉蓝豆:224
经验:7005
注册时间:2008-11-21
加关注  |  发消息
52 楼    发表于2010-10-31 23:27:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 

认真学习王老师提供的关于P16与宫颈病变的文献!

0
回复
signature
许春雷

1212 离线

帖子:85
粉蓝豆:256
经验:234
注册时间:2010-10-31
加关注  |  发消息
53 楼    发表于2010-11-01 10:30:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 病理医生的压力和风险太大了
0
回复

骄阳如歌 离线

帖子:1138
粉蓝豆:12
经验:1531
注册时间:2009-12-13
加关注  |  发消息
54 楼    发表于2010-11-01 10:43:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 向各位老师学习了!
0
回复
signature
做好生活中的每一件事,永远欣赏积极向上的精神!

xclbljys 离线

帖子:5253
粉蓝豆:224
经验:7005
注册时间:2008-11-21
加关注  |  发消息
55 楼    发表于2010-11-01 15:44:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用1212在2010-11-1 10:30:00的发言:

 病理医生的压力和风险太大了

 

只要您“客观观察病变、抓住诊断要点、充分认识病谱、不受“经典和权威”束缚、循证(形态、IHC、分子、随访)病理诊断。兼听则明,偏听则暗。”压力和风险就能逐渐地释放!

0
回复
signature
许春雷

alex20092009 离线

帖子:19
粉蓝豆:1
经验:19
注册时间:2010-09-25
加关注  |  发消息
56 楼    发表于2010-11-01 16:49:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 新手,路过,看看
0
回复

可可 离线

帖子:829
粉蓝豆:446
经验:1393
注册时间:2009-08-08
加关注  |  发消息
57 楼    发表于2010-11-01 18:44:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 帖子收藏了,一定认真看看楼上各位老师们提供的文献~
0
回复
signature
眼看,心悟,博览群书,行万里路~爱家爱国爱自己!

kfh 离线

帖子:95
粉蓝豆:121
经验:182
注册时间:2008-10-13
加关注  |  发消息
58 楼    发表于2010-11-01 19:31:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 学习
0
回复
signature
早起的鸟儿有虫吃!

大雪素 离线

帖子:1542
粉蓝豆:241
经验:8510
注册时间:2010-01-25
加关注  |  发消息
59 楼    发表于2010-11-01 20:04:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 看了 帖子,学了不少东西,感谢各位老师的讲解!
0
回复
signature
挺挺花卉中,竹有节而啬花,梅有花而啬叶,松有叶而啬香,唯兰独并有之

天马行空-黑马 离线

帖子:17
粉蓝豆:1
经验:17
注册时间:2010-10-31
加关注  |  发消息
60 楼    发表于2010-11-01 21:57:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 看了IHC,应该诊断CIN2-3并累腺
0
回复
回复:65 阅读:20711
共4页/65条首页上一页1234下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接