共2页/36条首页上一页12下一页尾页
回复:36 阅读:7314
罕见病理1

水若寒 离线

帖子:1019
粉蓝豆:971
经验:1383
注册时间:2009-09-23
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2010-10-06 20:41|举报|关注(1)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复
姓    名: ××× 性别:   年龄:  
标本名称:  
简要病史:  
肉眼检查:  
男,30岁,胃窦肿瘤 ,大小15cm*12cm.
  • 罕见病理1图1
    图1
  • 罕见病理1图2
    图2
  • 罕见病理1图3
    图3
  • 罕见病理1图4
    图4
标签:
0
×参考诊断
胃母细胞瘤

wl15 离线

帖子:25
粉蓝豆:2
经验:27
注册时间:2011-06-02
加关注  |  发消息
36 楼    发表于2011-11-18 18:47:36举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

形态像胃母,能否再提供几张HE?

0
回复

贝贝 离线

帖子:851
粉蓝豆:15
经验:1510
注册时间:2007-11-23
加关注  |  发消息
35 楼    发表于2011-11-18 16:18:33举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 谢谢明月老师 !期待哪位老师能翻译一下,谢谢!

0
回复

海马 离线

帖子:504
粉蓝豆:12
经验:556
注册时间:2008-08-26
加关注  |  发消息
34 楼    发表于2011-11-18 15:34:31举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

切片看起来似乎有双向分化,但仔细看上皮样分化的细胞形态与其余梭形细胞形态相似,应该为不同切面的原因,结合临床首先应该考虑GIST.

 

0
回复

hunter120 离线

帖子:150
粉蓝豆:487
经验:530
注册时间:2008-03-14
加关注  |  发消息
33 楼    发表于2011-10-11 11:37:29举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

首先考虑GIST

0
回复
signature
生活就是在演绎一个不知道结局的真实过程。

ldx849756917 离线

帖子:244
粉蓝豆:5
经验:802
注册时间:2008-04-24
加关注  |  发消息
32 楼    发表于2011-09-28 10:05:07举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

别出心裁地起名为胃母细胞瘤,是不是任何器官都发生相应的母细胞瘤?肿瘤与促纤维性小圆细胞肿瘤如何区分?区分有没有价值?我一直有一种倾向,即肿瘤或瘤样病变的良恶性判断是我们病理人的核心,也是临床医生最关心的,能肯定是恶性的肿瘤的细分类是次要的。不知道各位老师如何认为?

1

zblzbl20..
回复
signature
Tumors do not read textbooks!肿瘤不厚道,它从不按常规出牌!

fuyan0810 离线

帖子:309
粉蓝豆:1
经验:375
注册时间:2008-05-11
加关注  |  发消息
6 楼    发表于2010-11-19 22:55:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 学习了
0
回复

虚无缥缈 离线

帖子:24
粉蓝豆:1
经验:24
注册时间:2010-10-27
加关注  |  发消息
7 楼    发表于2010-10-28 13:21:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 学习了
0
回复

xzyyh 离线

帖子:385
粉蓝豆:12
经验:392
注册时间:2007-11-26
加关注  |  发消息
8 楼    发表于2010-10-27 16:02:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 好病历!学习!
0
回复

九华 离线

帖子:223
粉蓝豆:29
经验:982
注册时间:2007-01-21
加关注  |  发消息
9 楼    发表于2010-10-27 16:00:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 学习了
0
回复
signature
病理是我的热爱,所以离开后,转身又回来了!!

蓝月 离线

帖子:1245
粉蓝豆:376
经验:1966
注册时间:2007-12-18
加关注  |  发消息
10 楼    发表于2010-10-19 08:53:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 学习了
0
回复

owen84007 离线

帖子:354
粉蓝豆:50
经验:406
注册时间:2009-07-10
加关注  |  发消息
11 楼    发表于2010-10-18 12:55:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 学习了!
0
回复

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
12 楼    发表于2010-10-18 12:37:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 请能否将该病例转到疑难罕见病例专栏。谢谢!
0
回复
signature
王军臣

emmprin 离线

帖子:98
粉蓝豆:358
经验:165
注册时间:2009-04-12
加关注  |  发消息
13 楼    发表于2010-10-18 10:57:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 请楼主提供免疫组化结果
0
回复

Chiang 离线

帖子:2443
粉蓝豆:1085
经验:3336
注册时间:2006-10-03
加关注  |  发消息
14 楼    发表于2010-10-18 09:48:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 谢谢!
0
回复

sugar2004 离线

帖子:25
粉蓝豆:182
经验:62
注册时间:2009-04-21
加关注  |  发消息
15 楼    发表于2010-10-17 20:14:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 学习
0
回复

大海一栗 离线

帖子:1258
粉蓝豆:9
经验:1596
注册时间:2010-07-09
加关注  |  发消息
16 楼    发表于2010-10-17 19:57:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 谢谢,
0
回复

宁静致远 离线

帖子:4242
粉蓝豆:2853
经验:6556
注册时间:2007-03-27
加关注  |  发消息
17 楼    发表于2010-10-17 16:55:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 谢谢明月老师
0
回复

SOS991229 离线

帖子:1561
粉蓝豆:1747
经验:1886
注册时间:2008-01-15
加关注  |  发消息
18 楼    发表于2010-10-17 15:34:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 谢谢明月老师,长见识了。
0
回复

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
19 楼    发表于2010-10-10 12:28:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2010-10-10 12:29:00 编辑

 最近文献报道的一例胃母细胞瘤

见组织学特征


名称:图1
描述:图1
0
回复
signature
王军臣

海上明月 离线

帖子:9476
粉蓝豆:1172
经验:10007
注册时间:2009-08-29
加关注  |  发消息
20 楼    发表于2010-10-10 12:23:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 下列是两篇关于“胃母细胞瘤”的参考文献。这个诊断名词只是去年由Miettinen等提出,今年又报道1例,全球共报道4例。

组织学特点是双向分化。

IHC表型主要是上皮细胞CK(AE1/AE3+、CK18+和CK7+;而CK5/6和CK20是阴性的);梭形间叶细胞表达CD10+。

1. J Clin Pathol. 2010 Mar;63(3):270-4.

Novel epitheliomesenchymal biphasic stomach tumour (gastroblastoma) in a 9-year-old: morphological, ultrastructural and immunohistochemical findings.

Shin DH, Lee JH, Kang HJ, Choi KU, Kim JY, Park do Y, Lee CH, Sol MY, Park JH, Kim HY, Montgomery E.

Department of Pathology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yang-san, Korea.

Abstract

Gastroblastoma is a rare gastric epitheliomesenchymal biphasic tumour composed of spindle and epithelial cells, reported by Miettinen et al in a series of three cases in 2009. All those cases arose in stomachs of young adults. Neither the epithelial nor the mesenchymal component displayed sufficient atypia to diagnose a carcinosarcoma or other malignancy. On immunohistochemistry, the epithelial component expressed cytokeratin, and the mesenchymal component was positive for vimentin and CD10. Miettinen et al designated these neoplasms as gastroblastomas based on their similarities with other childhood blastomas such as pleuropulmonary blastoma and nephroblastoma. This report describes a probable fourth case of this unique type of neoplasm. The present case arose in the gastric antrum of a 9-year-old boy. While similarities were evident with the other cases, there were some differences. The epithelial component was more predominant and showed more mature morphology. Immunohistochemically, the epithelial component showed immunolabelling for c-KIT and CD56. The mesenchymal component was only focally positive for CD10. Ultrastructually, desmosomes and microvilli were found supporting a truly epithelial lesion.

2. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Sep;33(9):1370-7.

A distinctive novel epitheliomesenchymal biphasic tumor of the stomach in young adults ("gastroblastoma"): a series of 3 cases.

Miettinen M, Dow N, Lasota J, Sobin LH.

Department of Soft Tissue Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 6825 16th Street, N.W., Building 54, Room G090, Washington, DC 20306-6000, USA. miettinen@afip.osd.mil

Abstract

This report describes 3 cases of a distinctive, hitherto unreported gastric epitheliomesenchymal biphasic tumor that differs from other biphasic tumors of the stomach and elsewhere: carcinosarcoma, biphasic synovial sarcoma, teratoma, and mixed tumor. The tumors occurred in young adults, 2 males and 1 female, of ages 19, 27, and 30 years. Two tumors were located in the greater curvature in the gastric body and one in the antrum. The tumors measured 5, 6, and 15 cm in maximum diameter, and their mitotic rates were 0, 4, and 30 mitoses per 50HPF. There were 2 components: uniform oval or spindled cells in diffuse sheets, and clusters or cords of epithelial cells occasionally forming glandular structures with small lumens. The epithelial elements were positive for keratin cocktail AE1/AE3, keratin 18, and partly for keratin 7, but were negative for keratins 5/6, 20 and epithelial membrane antigen. The spindle cells were positive for vimentin and CD10. All components were negative for CD34, CD99, estrogen receptor, KIT, smooth muscle actin, desmin S100 protein, p63, calretinin, chromogranin, synaptophysin, CDX2, and thyroid transcription factor 1. In situ hybridization for SS18 rearrangement was negative in all cases separating this tumor from synovial sarcoma. All 3 patients were alive after follow-up of 3.5, 5, and 14 years. Because these tumors have some resemblance to blastomas of other organs, we propose the term "gastroblastoma" for this distinctive, at least low-grade malignant epitheliomesenchymal tumor of the stomach.

0
回复
signature
王军臣
回复:36 阅读:7314
共2页/36条首页上一页12下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接