共2页/25条首页上一页12下一页尾页
回复:25 阅读:4878
51岁/子宫肿瘤

xljin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2010-01-25 07:49|举报|关注(1)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复
姓    名: ××× 性别:  女 年龄:  51
标本名称:  全子宫+双侧附件切除
简要病史:  子宫肌瘤多年,近期增大明显。
肉眼检查: 子宫壁间肿瘤, 最大直径10cm, 灰红色,部分出血坏死
图1卵巢, 图2内膜 图2-12肿瘤
  • 51岁/子宫肿瘤图1
    图1
  • 51岁/子宫肿瘤图2
    图2
  • 51岁/子宫肿瘤图3
    图3
  • 51岁/子宫肿瘤图4
    图4
  • 51岁/子宫肿瘤图5
    图5
  • 51岁/子宫肿瘤图6
    图6
  • 51岁/子宫肿瘤图7
    图7
  • 51岁/子宫肿瘤图8
    图8
  • 51岁/子宫肿瘤图9
    图9
  • 51岁/子宫肿瘤图10
    图10
  • 51岁/子宫肿瘤图11
    图11
  • 51岁/子宫肿瘤图12
    图12
标签:
本帖最后由 于 2010-01-25 07:51:00 编辑
0
signature
xljin8
×参考诊断
子宫恶性血管周上皮样细胞肿瘤

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
1 楼    发表于2010-01-25 14:30:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

您的诊断?

1)奇异性平滑肌瘤?

2)平滑肌肉瘤

3)上皮样平滑肌肉瘤

4)粘液性平滑肌肉瘤

5)PEComa?

6)其他?

0
回复
signature
xljin8

lanyueliang 离线

帖子:679
粉蓝豆:11
经验:1424
注册时间:2008-11-12
加关注  |  发消息
2 楼    发表于2010-01-25 16:36:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

奇异性平滑肌瘤

0
回复

wfbjwt 离线

帖子:6628
粉蓝豆:163
经验:7418
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
3 楼    发表于2010-01-25 17:55:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 仅见弥漫的异型性,未见坏死(镜下)和分裂相,考虑奇异性平滑肌瘤
0
回复
signature
嫁人就嫁灰太狼,学习要上华夏网。

yxybyf 离线

帖子:515
粉蓝豆:7
经验:627
注册时间:2007-05-13
加关注  |  发消息
4 楼    发表于2010-01-25 18:01:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 考虑奇异性平滑肌瘤
0
回复

向您学习 离线

帖子:918
粉蓝豆:375
经验:3869
注册时间:2006-10-25
加关注  |  发消息
5 楼    发表于2010-01-25 18:09:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 从这几张图片看,考虑:奇异型平滑肌瘤
0
回复
signature
三人行,必有我师焉,择其善者而从之,择其不善者而改之。

3673566 离线

帖子:1879
粉蓝豆:79
经验:3305
注册时间:2006-10-29
加关注  |  发消息
6 楼    发表于2010-01-25 20:58:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 "部分出血坏死",镜下有坏死吗?边界清楚吗?从大体描述来看平滑肌肉瘤不能排除,建议多取坏死交界区、肿瘤边缘等。
0
回复

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
7 楼    发表于2010-01-26 03:42:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2010-01-26 05:36:00 编辑 增加HE照片。图9-12示坏死。
  • 图1
  • 图2
  • 图3
  • 图4
  • 图5
  • 图6
  • 图7
  • 图8
  • 图9
  • 图10
  • 图11
  • 图12
0
回复
signature
xljin8

冬青 离线

帖子:101
粉蓝豆:999
经验:326
注册时间:2009-10-25
加关注  |  发消息
8 楼    发表于2010-01-26 10:31:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 我科遇到一类似病例,47岁女性,肌壁间及浆膜下多发性平滑肌瘤,长径0.5-6.0cm,其中多个小结节镜下为典型平滑肌瘤图像,最大者镜下类似金老师上传的9-12图(切片蜡块已借出,无法上传),细胞奇异伴坏死,但无核分裂像。此例该如何诊断?!
0
回复
signature
能健康的活着\并快乐的工作着,很幸运!

冬青 离线

帖子:101
粉蓝豆:999
经验:326
注册时间:2009-10-25
加关注  |  发消息
9 楼    发表于2010-01-26 10:55:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

多发性大小不等的平滑肌瘤提示病程长,但大者镜下细胞核长形或畸型,可见核仁及多核巨细胞,伴变性坏死及炎细胞浸润,核分裂像未见,符合奇异性平滑肌瘤。但病人子宫切除术后三月感不适入外院检查,提示卵巢肿瘤,转移待排(具体病情不详),请金老师帮助分析。

0
回复
signature
能健康的活着\并快乐的工作着,很幸运!

xzjinying 离线

帖子:23
粉蓝豆:1
经验:23
注册时间:2009-10-21
加关注  |  发消息
10 楼    发表于2010-01-26 11:33:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 奇异型子宫平滑肌瘤
0
回复

gzjyys 离线

帖子:108
粉蓝豆:3
经验:112
注册时间:2010-01-13
加关注  |  发消息
11 楼    发表于2010-01-26 11:55:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 子宫奇异型平滑肌瘤
0
回复

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
12 楼    发表于2010-01-27 03:32:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2010-01-27 03:34:00 编辑 仔细的观察HE切片有哪些不符合“奇异性平滑肌瘤”的形态学改变?


1)奇异性平滑肌瘤?-不是

2)平滑肌肉瘤?

3)上皮样平滑肌肉瘤?

4)粘液性平滑肌肉瘤?

5)PEComa?

6)其他?


0
回复
signature
xljin8

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
13 楼    发表于2010-01-27 20:06:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2010-01-27 20:10:00 编辑  病理诊断“子宫PEComa 有不同意见吗?
0
回复
signature
xljin8

wfbjwt 离线

帖子:6628
粉蓝豆:163
经验:7418
注册时间:2006-10-08
加关注  |  发消息
14 楼    发表于2010-01-27 20:34:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 如果有免疫组化,大概没人有意见,不过怎么考虑到要标HMB45呢?细胞透明?围绕血管排列?
0
回复
signature
嫁人就嫁灰太狼,学习要上华夏网。

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
15 楼    发表于2010-01-27 20:37:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 HMB-45+
0
回复
signature
xljin8

shandongzhang 离线

帖子:804
粉蓝豆:506
经验:1510
注册时间:2006-09-24
加关注  |  发消息
16 楼    发表于2010-01-27 20:46:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用xljin8在2010-1-27 20:06:00的发言:

 病理诊断“子宫PEComa 有不同意见吗?

组织学图象也符合

PEComas具有以下两个或更多特征时要考虑恶性的或者高危侵袭行为,直径> 5 cm,边缘浸润,瘤细胞坏死,核分裂象> 1个/50 HPF,脉管侵犯,高级别的核或胞质。

PEComas具有多形性核或者多核巨细胞之一或者体积> 5 cm都被考虑为不确定潜在恶性。

PEComas体积< 5 cm,低级别细胞学,核分裂象(< 1个/50HPF),没有浸润,没有坏死或者血管浸润都被考虑为临床良性的。

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
17 楼    发表于2010-01-28 02:21:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2010-01-28 04:38:00 编辑

 Agree with the interpretation from Dr. Zhang.

I would like to see the IHC results.

If smooth muscle markers and HMB45 or melan A or s100 positive, it is a PEComa.

If only smooth muscle markers pos, it is leiomyosarcoma (atypia + tumor necrosis or mitoses).

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
18 楼    发表于2010-01-28 02:23:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 

Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Dec;29(12):1558-75.

Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms of soft tissue and gynecologic origin: a clinicopathologic study of 26 cases and review of the literature.

Folpe AL, Mentzel T, Lehr HA, Fisher C, Balzer BL, Weiss SW.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. afolpe@emory.edu

PEComas, occasionally associated with the tuberous sclerosis complex, are defined by the presence of perivascular epithelioid cells that coexpress muscle and melanocytic markers. This family of tumors includes angiomyolipoma (AML), clear cell sugar tumor of the lung (CCST), lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), and very rare tumors in other locations. Because non-AML/non-LAM PEComas are extremely rare and their natural history and prognostic features undefined, we present our experience with 26 PEComas of soft tissue and the gynecologic tract, the largest series to date. We also performed a detailed review of the literature, with special attention to features predictive of clinical behavior. All PEComas exclusive of AML and LAM were retrieved from our consultation files. Immunohistochemistry for pan-cytokeratin (CK), S-100 protein, smooth muscle actins (SMA), desmin, vimentin, HMB45, Melan-A, microphthalmia transcription factor (MiTF), TFE3, CD117, and CD34 was performed. Clinical follow-up information was obtained. Fisher's exact test was performed. The median patient age was 46 years (range, 15-97 years); there was a marked female predominance (22 females, 4 males). Sites of involvement included the omentum or mesentery (6 cases), uterus (4 cases), pelvic soft tissues (3 cases), abdominal wall (2 cases), uterine cervix (2 cases), and vagina, retroperitoneum, thigh, falciform ligament, scalp, broad ligament, forearm, shoulder, and neck (1 case each). The tumors ranged from 1.6 to 29 cm in size (median, 7.8 cm). Tumors were epithelioid (N = 9), spindled (N = 7), or mixed (N = 10). Multinucleated giant cells were present in 18 cases. High nuclear grade was noted in 10 cases, high cellularity in 7 cases, necrosis in 8 cases, and vascular invasion in 3 cases. Mitotic activity was 0 to 50 mitotic figures (MF)/50 high power fields (HPF) (median, 0 MF/50 HPF) with atypical MF in 6 cases. IHC results were: SMA (20/25), desmin (8/22), HMB45 (22/24), Melan-A (13/18), MITF (9/18), S-100 protein (8/24), CK (3/23), vimentin (12/14), TFE3 (5/17), c-kit (1/20), and CD34 (0/7). Clinical follow-up (24 of 26 patients, 92%; median, 30 months; range, 10-84 months) showed 3 local recurrences and 5 distant metastases. At last available clinical follow-up, 2 patients (8%) were dead of disease, 4 patients (17%) were alive with metastatic or unresectable local disease, and 18 patients (75%) were alive with no evidence of disease. No patient in our series had a history of tuberous sclerosis complex. Recurrence and/or metastasis was strongly associated tumor size > median size (8 cm), mitotic activity greater than 1/50 HPF, and necrosis. We conclude that PEComas of soft tissue and gynecologic origin may be classified as "benign," "of uncertain malignant potential," or "malignant." Small PEComas without any worrisome histologic features are most likely benign. PEComas with nuclear pleomorphism alone ("symplastic") and large PEComas without other worrisome features have uncertain malignant potential. PEComas with two or more worrisome histologic features should be considered malignant. Occasional PEComas express unusual markers, such as S-100 protein, desmin, and rarely CK. The role of TFE3 in PEComas should be further studied.

0
回复

XLJin8 离线

帖子:2275
粉蓝豆:1536
经验:2417
注册时间:2009-03-04
加关注  |  发消息
19 楼    发表于2010-01-28 03:30:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2010-01-28 03:32:00 编辑 图1Vimentin;图2SMA; 图3CD10; 图4-8 HMB-45;图9-10 H-caldesmon
  • 图1
  • 图2
  • 图3
  • 图4
  • 图5
  • 图6
  • 图7
  • 图8
  • 图9
  • 图10
0
回复
signature
xljin8

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
20 楼    发表于2010-01-28 04:44:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 Based on IHC results (smooth muscle marker pos and HMB45 pos) and the morphology (marked atypia, necorosism mitosis), large size (10 cm), it is malignant PEComa.

Not sure the treatment for uterine PEComa. I think it may be similar to uterine leiomyosarcoma.

0
回复
回复:25 阅读:4878
共2页/25条首页上一页12下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接