共1页/5条首页上一页1下一页尾页
回复:5 阅读:2460
请教

海浪信使 离线

帖子:1547
粉蓝豆:161
经验:2339
注册时间:2006-09-26
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2007-06-29 12:38|举报|关注(0)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复
请问各位老师:CEA在核上表达有什么意义?同样的试剂同一个技术员同时做的,在胃癌标本中是在浆表达,在肺癌标本中在核表达。谢谢!
标签:
0
signature
当你有选择的时候,不是选择正确的,而是选择不让你后悔的!
添加参考诊断
×参考诊断
  

yang 离线

帖子:304
粉蓝豆:21
经验:344
注册时间:2006-09-26
加关注  |  发消息
1 楼    发表于2007-07-02 10:38:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 CEA你是使用什么clone的,我查了一些文献均未见说CEA有核表达的情况,你是用什么检测系统?有无可能非特异表达?
0
回复

海浪信使 离线

帖子:1547
粉蓝豆:161
经验:2339
注册时间:2006-09-26
加关注  |  发消息
2 楼    发表于2007-07-02 20:25:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 我明天到单位查一下再向老师汇报啊!
0
回复
signature
当你有选择的时候,不是选择正确的,而是选择不让你后悔的!

海浪信使 离线

帖子:1547
粉蓝豆:161
经验:2339
注册时间:2006-09-26
加关注  |  发消息
3 楼    发表于2007-07-03 20:56:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用yang在2007-7-2 10:38:00的发言:

 CEA你是使用什么clone的,我查了一些文献均未见说CEA有核表达的情况,你是用什么检测系统?有无可能非特异表达?


所用试剂为CEA,上海长岛生物技术有限公司产品,目录编号:M-0194,单克隆抗体,克隆号:COL-1。

0
回复
signature
当你有选择的时候,不是选择正确的,而是选择不让你后悔的!

shanghainese 离线

帖子:1136
粉蓝豆:25
经验:1155
注册时间:2006-09-26
加关注  |  发消息
4 楼    发表于2007-07-03 22:57:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 
WT1, monoclonal CEA, TTF1, and CA125 antibodies in the differential diagnosis of lung, breast, and ovarian adenocarcinomas in serous effusions
Weijian Zhu, M.D., Ph.D., Claire W. Michael, M.D. *
Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan
email: Claire W. Michael (clairemi@med.umich.edu)

*Correspondence to Claire W. Michael, Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Hospitals, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Room 2G332 University Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0054

setDOI("ADOI=10.1002/dc.20643")

Keywords
immunostaining ?serous effusion ?adenocarcinoma ?WT1, CA125, TTF1 and mCEA

Abstract
The distinction between metastatic adenocarcinomas of lung (LAC), breast (BAC), and ovary (OAC) in serous effusions can be very difficult since they all can present as tight cell clusters. This is particularly challenging when the malignant effusion is the patient's initial presentation or when the patient has a history of more than one primary. The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of WT1, monoclonal CEA (mCEA), TTF1, and CA125 antibodies in the differential diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma from the lung, breast and ovary in serous effusions.
Forty-six samples of serous effusions with their corresponding cell blocks were retrieved from our hospital computer system, including 13 BACs, 13 LACs, and 20 OACs. The diagnoses were confirmed by the surgical resection. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded cell block sections were immunostained for WT1, mCEA, TTF1, and CA125. Two observers blindly reviewed the immunostained slides without knowledge of the previous clinical or histologic diagnoses. The staining intensity was graded semiquantitatively as negative, 0; weak, 1+; moderate, 2+; and strong, 3+. The percentage of positively staining cells was estimated. The distribution patterns of reactivity for WT1 and TTF1 were recorded as nuclear, and mCEA and CA125 as membranous stain.
Metastatic OACs showed positive immunoreactivity to WT1 in 19/20 (95%) cases, CA125 in 20/20 (100%), and all showed negative reaction for both mCEA (0/20, 0%) and TTF1 (0/20, 0%). BAC showed positive reaction in 6/13 (46%) cases to CA125 and mCEA. Staining pattern was diffuse for CA125 and focal for mCEA. Only 2/13 (15%) were positive for WT1, while all of 13 BAC cases (0/13, 0%) were negative for TTF1. LAC showed positive immunoreactivity for TTF1 in 9/13 (69%) with a characteristic nuclear staining pattern, but only 3/13 (23%) were focally stained for WT1. In addition, 8/13 (62%) of LAC cases were positive for both CA125 and mCEA.
Our results demonstrate that the WT1 stain is specific for metastatic carcinoma of ovarian primary, showing a high sensitivity. In addition, CA125 stain is very sensitive for OACs, but could be positive in about a half of LAC and BAC cases. An immunostaining pattern of positive mCEA as well as negative WT1 rules out OACs, raising the possibility of LACs and BACs. A positive TTF1 staining supports the diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma originating from lung rather than breast, while a negative TTF1 favors the diagnosis of a breast primary. Immunohistochemical studies with WT1, TTF1, and mCEA antibodies are useful in the differential diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinomas of lung, breast, and ovary. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2007;35:370-375. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

0
回复

海浪信使 离线

帖子:1547
粉蓝豆:161
经验:2339
注册时间:2006-09-26
加关注  |  发消息
5 楼    发表于2007-07-04 08:07:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 谢谢!
0
回复
signature
当你有选择的时候,不是选择正确的,而是选择不让你后悔的!
回复:5 阅读:2460
共1页/5条首页上一页1下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接