-
2 楼 发表于2010-01-08 22:01:00举报|引用
-
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
Figures 1-7 show a high grade infiltrating malignant glial neoplasm with necrosis and possible vascular/endothelial proliferation consistent with WHO grade IV glioblastoma. Figures 8-13 show a delicate capillary network between relatively uniform neoplastic cells suggestive of oligodendroglioma, but this determination can be very subjective. The neoplastic cells in these areas also suggest neuronal/neurocytic differentiation. Figures 15 and 16 must be S100 protein and synaptophysin (I am not absolutely sure which is which) and, if so, bring an interesting differential diagnosis of mixed glioneuronal tumor. Figure 14 and Figure 17 are obviously CD34 and GFAP stains. It is important to compare synaptophysin and GFAP stains in the same cellular areas of the tumor. Please provide a GFAP photo taken in the cellular areas (as in Figures 15 and 16) so that we can compare. Thanks.
Figures 1-7 show a high grade infiltrating malignant glial neoplasm with necrosis and possible vascular/endothelial proliferation consistent with WHO grade IV glioblastoma. Figures 8-13 show a delicate capillary network between relatively uniform neoplastic cells suggestive of oligodendroglioma, but this determination can be very subjective. The neoplastic cells in these areas also suggest neuronal/neurocytic differentiation. Figures 15 and 16 must be S100 protein and synaptophysin (I am not absolutely sure which is which) and, if so, bring an interesting differential diagnosis of mixed glioneuronal tumor. Figure 14 and Figure 17 are obviously CD34 and GFAP stains. It is important to compare synaptophysin and GFAP stains in the same cellular areas of the tumor. Please provide a GFAP photo taken in the cellular areas (as in Figures 15 and 16) so that we can compare. Thanks.
- 0
聞道有先後,術業有專攻