| 图片： | |
|---|---|
| 名称： | |
| 描述： | |
- B230339岁右乳肿块 免疫组化已公布
图1
图2
图3
图4
图5
图6
图7
图8
图9
图10
图11
| 姓 名： | ××× | 性别： | 女 | 年龄： | 39 |
| 标本名称： | 右乳包块 | ||||
| 简要病史： | |||||
| 肉眼检查： | 组织一枚，切面见一结节，直径0.9厘米，灰白色 | ||||
标签：乳腺浸润性导管癌
-
本帖最后由 于 2009-12-19 11:32:00 编辑
相关帖子
×参考诊断
| 以下是引用绝世好片在2009-12-19 11:32:00的发言： 病人年龄比较年轻，包块很小只有0.9厘米，细胞比较一致，异型性不明显，细胞排列成挤压的小管状，列兵样，我们起初怀疑为浸润性小叶癌，需排除硬化性腺病，免疫组化结果：ER,PR弥漫一致性阳性，E-cad阳性，P63阴性，我们诊断为浸润性导管癌Ⅰ级。 |
Thank you for sharing the follow up results.
It is a good example to demonstrate the e-cad stain is very important for some cases.
-
lanyueliang 离线
- 帖子：679
- 粉蓝豆：11
- 经验：1424
- 注册时间：2008-11-12
- 加关注 | 发消息
-
shihong4699 离线
- 帖子：1024
- 粉蓝豆：43
- 经验：2917
- 注册时间：2009-01-20
- 加关注 | 发消息
-
This is a case of infiltrating carcinoma for sure. There is clearcut tubule formation, and the pattern of infiltration does suggest lobular differentiation. Therefore, E-cadherin immunostain will help. I personally think this is an infiltrating ductal carcinoma. High-power views of the most atypical area and mitotic count are needed to grade it. I do not see associated calcification, necrosis, in situ carcinoma, angiolymphatic or perineural invasion.
聞道有先後,術業有專攻
-
本帖最后由 于 2009-12-11 03:17:00 编辑
| 以下是引用mjma在2009-12-10 22:40:00的发言： This is a case of infiltrating carcinoma for sure. There is clearcut tubule formation, and the pattern of infiltration does suggest lobular differentiation. Therefore, E-cadherin immunostain will help. I personally think this is an infiltrating ductal carcinoma. High-power views of the most atypical area and mitotic count are needed to grade it. I do not see associated calcification, necrosis, in situ carcinoma, angiolymphatic or perineural invasion. HE形态符合浸润性导管癌。非常同意 Dr. mjma 的诊断和建议。 |
- xljin8
