-
1 楼 发表于2009-11-29 04:28:00举报|引用
-
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
As pointed out above, infiltrating lobular carcinoma is classified as (1) classical type, (2) pleomorphic/histiocytoid type, (3) mixed classic and histiocytoid type, and (4) tubulolobular type. Histiocytoid lobular carcinoma seems to behaves more aggressively than classical lobular carcinoma. These two types (and the mixed type) can be seen in lobular carcinoma in situ as well. In the old days, there was no standardized way to grade infiltrating lobular carcinomas. For more than 10 years now, however, most pathologists have adopted the Nottingham histologic score (the same scoring system used for infiltrating ductal carcinomas) in grading infiltrating lobular carcinomas. Three features (tubular differentiation, nuclear atypia and mitotic activity) are graded as scores 1 to 3, and the combined score of all three features decides the overall tumor grade (from grade 1 to 3).
As pointed out above, infiltrating lobular carcinoma is classified as (1) classical type, (2) pleomorphic/histiocytoid type, (3) mixed classic and histiocytoid type, and (4) tubulolobular type. Histiocytoid lobular carcinoma seems to behaves more aggressively than classical lobular carcinoma. These two types (and the mixed type) can be seen in lobular carcinoma in situ as well. In the old days, there was no standardized way to grade infiltrating lobular carcinomas. For more than 10 years now, however, most pathologists have adopted the Nottingham histologic score (the same scoring system used for infiltrating ductal carcinomas) in grading infiltrating lobular carcinomas. Three features (tubular differentiation, nuclear atypia and mitotic activity) are graded as scores 1 to 3, and the combined score of all three features decides the overall tumor grade (from grade 1 to 3).
- 0
聞道有先後,術業有專攻