I agree with Dr. Liu that this is a case of CIN1. There is no need for p16 or Ki-67 in this case, since there is no area with higher N/C ratio that is suspicious for CIN2 based on H&E morphology.
I agree with Dr. Liu that this is a case of CIN1. There is no need for p16 or Ki-67 in this case, since there is no area with higher N/C ratio that is suspicious for CIN2 based on H&E morphology.
I agree with Dr. Liu that this is a case of CIN1. There is no need for p16 or Ki-67 in this case, since there is no area with higher N/C ratio that is suspicious for CIN2 based on H&E morphology.
I agree with Dr. Liu that this is a case of CIN1. There is no need for p16 or Ki-67 in this case, since there is no area with higher N/C ratio that is suspicious for CIN2 based on H&E morphology.