图片: | |
---|---|
名称: | |
描述: | |
以下是引用飞龙在天在2008-11-30 2:57:00的发言:
译文(新手上路 请多指点):: 少许退化的腺上皮。腺上皮数量太少不足以做出诊断。是否为经期宫内膜组织?之所以如此考虑是基于如下几点:细胞较小、混乱堆积成簇、胞浆空泡变性。 |
感谢喻老师!
飞龙在天,谢谢你
Small cluster of cells with cytologic atypia. I may be ok for menstrial related endometrial cells If women's LMP was within few days. If i know nothing about this women's history, I will call AGC based on patient's age and cytology. When you call benign in clinical practice you have to be 100% sure. I may call this case benign if I am taking an exam.
Remember that most of AGC cases will turn out to be benign. It does not mean that you make a wrong dx of AGC if it is negative in biopsy follow up.
I am working on my AGC research paper. Among 662 AGC cases (may be the largest study) with histologic follow-up only 3.2% had cervical glandular lesion (AIS or invasive adenocarcinoma), and 8.2% had endometrial lesions, and 6.2% had CIN 2/3.
Just for your reference.
jiangxiaoyu 离线
以下是引用mingfuyu在2008-11-27 9:51:00的发言: Degenerated glandular cells. Too few to make a judgement. Menstral endometrial group? The reason i am thinking of endometrial groups include smaller cell size, piled up cluster and some cytoplasmic degenerative vacuoles. |
译文(新手上路 请多指点)::
少许退化的腺上皮。腺上皮数量太少不足以做出诊断。是否为经期宫内膜组织?之所以如此考虑是基于如下几点:细胞较小、混乱堆积成簇、胞浆空泡变性。