共1页/15条首页上一页1下一页尾页
回复:15 阅读:2944
Frozen Section of Breast Lesions - An article from China

stevenshen 离线

帖子:343
粉蓝豆:2
经验:343
注册时间:2008-06-03
加关注  |  发消息
楼主 发表于 2008-11-08 12:53|举报|关注(0)
浏览排序[ 顺序 逆序 楼主 支持 精彩 ]  快捷回复
姓    名: ××× 性别:  Female 年龄:  20-80 yrs
标本名称:  Breast
简要病史:  Lump, mass, calcification,or nipple discharge
肉眼检查:
标签:
本帖最后由 于 2008-11-08 13:00:00 编辑
0
添加参考诊断
×参考诊断
  

stevenshen 离线

帖子:343
粉蓝豆:2
经验:343
注册时间:2008-06-03
加关注  |  发消息
1 楼    发表于2008-11-08 12:57:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

This is an article published last year and I will read it also.  I will post a few other articles from Europe and US and hope they are helpful to you.  

Niu Y, Fu XL, Yu Y, Wang PP, Cao XC. Intra-operative frozen section diagnosis of breast lesions: a retrospective analysis of 13,243 Chinese patients. Chinese Medical Journal, 2007, Vol. 120 No. 8 : 630-635 (From Tianjin Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.)

BACKGROUND: Although cytological methods for breast oncology have been used in recent decades, intra-operative frozen section has been playing a vital role in making therapeutic decisions. We analyzed a large series of frozen section diagnoses for Chinese cases of breast lesion within the last 15 years. The experience was expected to increase the diagnostic accuracy of cases with breast lesions. METHODS: The data from consecutive 13243 cases of breast lesions diagnosed with intra-operative frozen sections between 1988 to 2002 were compared with paraffin sections in a case by case manner. The causes of false negative and positive diagnoses as well as delayed diagnoses were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen cases (0.9%) were falsely diagnosed, with one false positive case and 116 false negative cases. The diagnosis of 47 cases (0.4%) was delayed. The proportion of several lesions had the features of the patients' ages. Six types (false invasion, peri-papilloma, adenoma of nipple duct, florid adenosis, sclerosing adenosis, and granulose cell tumor) of lesions may lead to false positive, and four types (morphological changes responding chemotherapy, well differentiated papillary carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma, and tubular carcinoma) to a false negative. Gross and microscopic findings may be inconsistent in two types of lesions (radial scar and florid adenosis) microscopic and clinical findings in three types (ganulomatous mastitis mammary, duct ectasia, and fat necrosis), and three types (abundant fat or sclerous tissues; borderline lesions and changes of post-chemotherapy) were likely wrongly classified. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-operative frozen section can accurately identify breast lesions in many instances, leading to fewer errors on account of more diagnostic experience and understanding of diagnostic limitations.

0
回复

小荷 离线

帖子:8546
粉蓝豆:97
经验:12725
注册时间:2006-09-11
加关注  |  发消息
2 楼    发表于2008-11-08 23:54:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 :))
0
回复
signature
没有完美的个人,只有完美的团队

月新 离线

帖子:528
粉蓝豆:1313
经验:547
注册时间:2006-10-05
加关注  |  发消息
3 楼    发表于2008-11-09 18:35:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 The data from consecutive 13243 cases of breast lesions diagnosed with intra-operative frozen sections between 1988 to 2002 were compared with paraffin sections in a case by case manner. 天津肿瘤研究所,从1988--2002做13243 例冰冻切片,The causes of false negative and positive diagnoses as well as delayed diagnoses were analyzed. 分析其误诊原因,RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen cases (0.9%)  were falsely diagnosed, with one false positive case and 116 false negative cases. 结果误诊率为117例 (0.9%) ,1例假阳性,116例假阴性。The diagnosis of 47 cases (0.4%) was delayed.  (0.4%) 47例术中冰冻不能诊断,需要等常规病理。天津肿瘤研究所这么高的水平,还有这么高的误诊,给我们一颗定心丸。

我们如果误诊一例,临床和病人都想打死我们。

0
回复

Lili0321 离线

帖子:255
粉蓝豆:4
经验:277
注册时间:2008-06-26
加关注  |  发消息
4 楼    发表于2008-11-09 19:47:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 冰冻情愿低诊断,冰冻也不诊断浸润性小叶癌--与淋巴瘤在冰冻里无法区分。似乎国外已用core biopsy取代了冰冻诊断乳腺癌。
0
回复

Lili0321 离线

帖子:255
粉蓝豆:4
经验:277
注册时间:2008-06-26
加关注  |  发消息
5 楼    发表于2008-11-09 19:47:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 冰冻情愿低诊断,冰冻也不诊断浸润性小叶癌--与淋巴瘤在冰冻里无法区分。似乎国外已用core biopsy取代了冰冻诊断乳腺癌。
0
回复

stevenshen 离线

帖子:343
粉蓝豆:2
经验:343
注册时间:2008-06-03
加关注  |  发消息
6 楼    发表于2008-11-09 23:40:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

Thanks for Dr. Yuexin and Dr. Lili0321's comments.  I have read some of the other discussions and comments in previous postings in frozen and breast sections, particularly by byq and  Dr. 力刀. Here is a summary and hope this will be helpful for your practice.   If intraoperative frozen section is required, we have to realize it is a dangerous area for making diagnosis, get well trained and be conservative and avoid some of the common pitfalls and mistakes.  We welcome comments form colleagues from China and US.

 

Current diagnostic and treatment flow for breast lesions in US

·          Patient had abnormal mammographic finding (microcalcification), mass/nodule or nipple discharge

·          Core needle biopsy for routine H&E stain and diagnosis, also for ER/PR/Her-2/neu stains

·          Confirmed by pathologist to be benign or malignant (in situ or invasive carcinoma)

·          If benign, discussion with patient –  options are surveillance or conservative excision

·          If malignant, plan for appropriate surgery either by lumpectomy or mastectomy with or without sentinel

Lymph node biopsy with or without axillary dissection for staging

·          Planning for Rx or chemotherapy based on diagnosis, TNM stage and other risk factors

Potential problems with frozen section of breast lesions

·          For small mass lesion, easily to be lost during freezing and cutting

·          For non-palpable (microcalcification), sampling for frozen a huge problem

·          Very poor quality slides and frozen artifacts

·          Difficult for pathologist to make a accurate diagnosis  

·          The results are unacceptably high false negative and false positive or deferred diagnosis

 (Very rare frozen dx for breast lesion in US!)

Current practice in the smaller community hospital in China (thanks to byq)

·          乳腺包块的病人到医院来了

·          临床医生开个单子叫他先到病理科做细针穿刺 (fine needle aspiration cytology – cannot differentiated DCIS or invasive carcinoma)

·          如果有问题 (suspicious for DCIS or Invasive Ca),临床医生就让病人住院手术 (what if not diagnostic, benign, atypical hyperplasia or DCIS or LCIS, what next?)

·          术中为了保险起见,(incisional biopsy specimen?), 做个冰冻 (if confirm malignant – DCIS and invasive?) 再把乳房切掉 (breast conservation surgery or not?)

·          What about if frozen diagnosis is benign? What’s next

·          现在对乳腺癌的治疗提倡新辅助化疗 (neoadjvant chemotherapy): what the inclusion criteria?

国内开展粗针活检还不是很普遍,原因是多方面的:

Ø       一是耗材较贵 (did anybody actually perform a comparison cost analysis with current practice)

Ø       二是粗针穿刺标本也是很小的标本,出现漏诊的几率据报道可达7% (where are the data from?)

Ø       标本送到病理科我们感觉组织太小 (size of core and number of core, bx technique)

Ø       做起来非常困难 (diagnostically),切片出来有时候根本看不到肿瘤细胞,

Ø       No tissue left for下一步要做免疫组化染色等也就无从做起

 

Do we need to and how to improve the breast cancer care in China

Ø       First we have to have evidence to support that the practice in US and Europe are better for the patient care

Ø       Cost-benefit analysis comparison between current practice in China and standard practice in US

Ø       The conclusion may be frozen diagnosis may be acceptable and practical in China

Ø       Identify what are the challenge areas for adoption of abandoning routine frozen section

o         Core biopsy (by radiologist or surgeon)

§          Biopsy equipment and instrument

§          Size of cutting needle

§          Experience and training (radiologist or surgeon)

o         Diagnostic skill (pathologist training)

§          Training course

§          Pitfalls and problems

§          Clinico-pathologic-clinical correlation

0
回复

曹大夫 离线

帖子:331
粉蓝豆:510
经验:429
注册时间:2006-09-28
加关注  |  发消息
7 楼    发表于2008-11-10 01:05:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 

 乳腺的冰冻相对而言不容易, 因为有很多脂肪组织, 冰冻的形态学有很多假象。

还有冰冻是诊断肿瘤本身还是看手术边界,看边界可能更难,看肿瘤本身因为有一个肿块. 美国很多大医院不做乳腺手术边界的冰冻,肿块一般先用活检诊断,然后根据活检结果和其他因素如影响学决定手术方法. 国内的情况不一样,可能是病人的负担,还有就是外科大夫的知识(说实话很多只是一手术工具,根本谈不上算一个医生). 

冰冻谁都会犯错误,是人就会犯错误,多少和大小的问题,难道外科大夫做手术不犯错,只是关了手术谁也不知道罢了.

当然做冰冻要小心,"上山容易下山难",叫上去了就下不来了. 

0
回复

cqzhao 离线

帖子:5518
粉蓝豆:1071
经验:5755
注册时间:2008-09-29
加关注  |  发消息
8 楼    发表于2008-11-10 06:47:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

 Good information from Dr. Shen. I copied writing below.

Current diagnostic and treatment flow for breast lesions in US

·          Patient had abnormal mammographic finding (microcalcification), mass/nodule or nipple discharge

·          Core needle biopsy for routine H&E stain and diagnosis, also for ER/PR/Her-2/neu stains

·          Confirmed by pathologist to be benign or malignant (in situ or invasive carcinoma)

·          If benign, discussion with patient –  options are surveillance or conservative excision

·          If malignant, plan for appropriate surgery either by lumpectomy or mastectomy with or without sentinel

Lymph node biopsy with or without axillary dissection for staging

·          Planning for Rx or chemotherapy based on diagnosis, TNM stage and other risk factors

How do we do in our hospital

The steps for breast mass or abnormal:

1. Clinical examination

2. Imaging study. In fact many women were found to have abnormal mamogram including calcification et al in the  the mamogram screening.

3. Fine needle aspiration (down due to the core bx) or breast core biopsy to make the diagnosis. If it is cancer, the immunostains for ER, PR, Her2 are performed.

4. Based on above information, partial (or excisional) mastectomy or total mastectomy  with or wothout axillary lymph node dissection will be performed. Some time the patients will have chemotherapy or hormon treatment before the surgery.

Pathologists will be asked to evaluate the margins grossly. If tumor is close to (for example <5mm) or positive in the margins grossly, surgens will take another margin. Some times we do frozen for sentinel lymph node. If it is positive, axillary dissection will be performed. We almost never do frozen for breast mass to evaluate maligant or benign and never do frozen to evaluate tumor margins. Breast pathologists will fell difficulty to make diagnosis in perminent slides in many cases. How can pathologists make diagnosis in cluding the margins in few frozen sections in these cases?

Above is my experience in a large breast/GYN center. I think most hospitals in the US have the similar ways to deal with breast lesions.

I met several Chinese pathologists  here to know that the ways to deal with breat mass are very similar in most hospitals in China now. I felt unbeliveable in the begining. I talked with some older physician to know in the US they had the similar ways to deal with breast lesions before 1978-1981. We will have a long way to go.

It is not the question of our pathologists. It is the question for patient care, surgens, hosptal leaders, and pathologists. it is a concept we should change. Just like that cytotechnicians cannot rerease the abnormal Pap reports. Abnormal Pap results must be reviewed and sigin-out by well trained cytopathologists and pathologists.

Now I think the knowing or learning the priciple and concept is much more important than learning one case.

0
回复

力刀 离线

帖子:26
粉蓝豆:2
经验:26
注册时间:2008-01-09
加关注  |  发消息
9 楼    发表于2008-11-10 14:44:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用曹大夫在2008-11-10 1:05:00的发言:

&#160;

&#160;乳腺的冰冻相对而言不容易, 因为有很多脂肪组织, 冰冻的形态学有很多假象。

还有冰冻是诊断肿瘤本身还是看手术边界,看边界可能更难,看肿瘤本身因为有一个肿块. 美国很多大医院不做乳腺手术边界的冰冻,肿块一般先用活检诊断,然后根据活检结果和其他因素如影响学决定手术方法. 国内的情况不一样,可能是病人的负担,还有就是外科大夫的知识(说实话很多只是一手术工具,根本谈不上算一个医生). 

冰冻谁都会犯错误,是人就会犯错误,多少和大小的问题,难道外科大夫做手术不犯错,只是关了手术谁也不知道罢了.

当然做冰冻要小心,"上山容易下山难",叫上去了就下不来了. 

0
回复

wy1992 离线

帖子:4855
粉蓝豆:1
经验:6825
注册时间:2007-06-30
加关注  |  发消息
10 楼    发表于2008-11-10 15:34:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
 前几天我也误诊了一例.多亏了上帝保佑.病人家属无论如何不同意做根治术.后来通过普通才知道可能是病人做了美容引起的上皮样反应或肉芽样反应.我一直到现在还担心病家有一天来找我问罪.
0
回复
signature

朱正龙

stevenshen 离线

帖子:343
粉蓝豆:2
经验:343
注册时间:2008-06-03
加关注  |  发消息
11 楼    发表于2008-11-15 07:30:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
以下是引用力刀在2008-11-10 14:44:00的发言:

以下是引用曹大夫在2008-11-10 1:05:00的发言:

&#160;

&#160;乳腺的冰冻相对而言不容易, 因为有很多脂肪组织, 冰冻的形态学有很多假象。

还有冰冻是诊断肿瘤本身还是看手术边界,看边界可能更难,看肿瘤本身因为有一个肿块. 美国很多大医院不做乳腺手术边界的冰冻,肿块一般先用活检诊断,然后根据活检结果和其他因素如影响学决定手术方法. 国内的情况不一样,可能是病人的负担,还有就是外科大夫的知识(说实话很多只是一手术工具,根本谈不上算一个医生). 

冰冻谁都会犯错误,是人就会犯错误,多少和大小的问题,难道外科大夫做手术不犯错,只是关了手术谁也不知道罢了.

当然做冰冻要小心,"上山容易下山难",叫上去了就下不来了. 

Thanks 曹大夫 and 力刀 for the comments and support.

It's unlikely that the routine frozen section practice in China will change in a short time. The only way to avoid mistake is to get well trained in breast pathology, when you in doubt - get consultations, be conservative, tell the surgeons that "it is difficult to be certain, wait for permanent paraffin sections"

0
回复

stevenshen 离线

帖子:343
粉蓝豆:2
经验:343
注册时间:2008-06-03
加关注  |  发消息
12 楼    发表于2008-11-15 21:36:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
Also appreciate the comments and perspectives from Dr. Zhao, an expert in breast pathologist with lot of experience from a well-known, one of the top hospitals in USA in the care of patients with breast cancer and gynecological malignancy.
0
回复

byq 离线

帖子:845
粉蓝豆:129
经验:3229
注册时间:2006-09-25
加关注  |  发消息
13 楼    发表于2008-11-29 08:41:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2008-11-29 14:00:00 编辑  谢谢楼上各位老师对乳腺冰冻的探讨,以及目前欧美国家对乳腺病变的相对标准化处理程序的介绍。另外我就stevenshen老师给我提的几个问题做一简要回答:首先请stevenshen老师原谅我先前在介绍我们医院对乳腺病变处理时的粗略,尤其是用词的不精确性,比如说乳腺穿刺有问题,我没有说明是癌等等。中国国情和欧美国家有很大的不同,13亿人口,医院也多,中小型的医院无数(对不起,确切的数字我没查过),由于各种原因,医生的素质和水平高低不一,再加上对一些病变的处理目前暂时还没有强制性规范和标准,比如对乳腺有病变的病人,是不是一定要做影象学检查,影象学检查是不是一定要包括钼钯照片,导管内癌是否一定只能做病灶切除,哪些病人适合做新辅助化疗.粗针穿刺应该取几条组织合适等等,因此临床医生的随意性较大,乳腺包块的病人来了,临床医生简单的触摸一下,就开个检查单到病理科做细针穿刺来了,有条件的医院当然也让病人做钼钯或彩超等检查。穿刺检查发现癌细胞或可疑癌细胞后,作为医生建议病人住院手术是一定的,病人可能选择在我们医院手术,也可能因为经济等原因,选择好一点的医院或差一点的医院去手术都是可能的。如果是良性病变,肿块也比较明确的话,通常也建议手术切除(当然只需切除肿块而已),炎症和乳腺增生性病变就做相应的治疗即可。术中冰冻多数病人是浸润性癌,这种情况下手术医生在征得病人和家属的同意下(通常在术前已与病人或家属说好,并签定了手术同意书)做乳房切除(通常是改良性乳房根治术);少数病人属于导管内癌,这种情况下就很难说了,有些可能也做乳腺切除,有些或许就只做病灶切除。至于漏诊率7%是我在不久前健康报上刊登的一篇题目为:乳腺穿刺并不是金标准的文章上看到的.另外在我们医院,做粗针穿刺价格在1500元人民币左右,作细诊穿刺不到100元.当然这仅仅是价格上的比较,如果粗针穿刺有癌组织,那意义肯定是细针穿刺不能比的.我暂时就说这些,不对的地方请各位老师指正.谢谢!
0
回复

stevenshen 离线

帖子:343
粉蓝豆:2
经验:343
注册时间:2008-06-03
加关注  |  发消息
14 楼    发表于2008-12-03 10:58:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复

byq - thank you very much! I didn't mean that you need to provide the information to my questions.  But, the information should be useful to all the readers. Breast cancer is a huge problem in China and the world. It affects many young and middle aged women. I trust that the practice in China will be more evidence-based, guideline-driven, and more in line with the western standards in the next few years. 

0
回复

月新 离线

帖子:528
粉蓝豆:1313
经验:547
注册时间:2006-10-05
加关注  |  发消息
15 楼    发表于2008-12-03 11:13:00举报|引用
返回顶部 | 快捷回复
本帖最后由 于 2008-12-03 16:47:00 编辑  

byq - thank you very much! 非常感谢白大夫,I didn't mean that you need to provide the information to my questions.  我的意见可能对你也没有什么具体的帮助,But, the information should be useful to all the readers. 但是这些信息应该对其它读者有帮助,Breast cancer is a huge problem in China and the world. 乳腺癌在中国和世界一样都是非常麻烦的,It affects many young and middle aged women. 对全世界的中青年妇女都有非常大的影响,I trust that the practice in China will be more evidence-based, guideline-driven, and more in line with the western standards in the next few years.  我相信:不久的将来中国的乳腺癌诊治会和世界接轨,会更加循证,会更加标准化,会接近到西方的诊治标准。

0
回复
回复:15 阅读:2944
共1页/15条首页上一页1下一页尾页
【免责声明】讨论内容仅作学术交流之用,不作为诊疗依据,由此而引起的法律问题作者及本站不承担任何责任。
快速回复
进入高级回复
您最多可输入10000个汉字,按 "Ctrl" + "Enter" 直接发送
搜索回复/乘电梯 ×
按内容
按会员
乘电梯
合作伙伴
友情链接